Kandzari David E, Bhatt Deepak L, Brar Sandeep, Devireddy Chandan M, Esler Murray, Fahy Martin, Flack John M, Katzen Barry T, Lea Janice, Lee David P, Leon Martin B, Ma Adrian, Massaro Joseph, Mauri Laura, Oparil Suzanne, O'Neill William W, Patel Manesh R, Rocha-Singh Krishna, Sobotka Paul A, Svetkey Laura, Townsend Raymond R, Bakris George L
Piedmont Heart Institute, Atlanta, GA, USA
Brigham and Women's Hospital Heart and Vascular Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Eur Heart J. 2015 Jan 21;36(4):219-27. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu441. Epub 2014 Nov 16.
The SYMPLICITY HTN-3 randomized, blinded, sham-controlled trial confirmed the safety of renal denervation (RDN), but did not meet its primary efficacy endpoint. Prior RDN studies have demonstrated significant and durable reductions in blood pressure. This analysis investigated factors that may help explain these disparate results.
Patients with resistant hypertension were randomized 2 : 1 to RDN (n = 364) or sham (n = 171). The primary endpoint was the difference in office systolic blood pressure (SBP) change at 6 months. A multivariable analysis identified predictors of SBP change. Additional analyses examined the influence of medication changes, results in selected subgroups and procedural factors. Between randomization and the 6-month endpoint, 39% of patients underwent medication changes. Predictors of office SBP reduction at 6 months were baseline office SBP ≥ 180 mmHg, aldosterone antagonist use, and non-use of vasodilators; number of ablations was a predictor in the RDN group. Non-African-American patients receiving RDN had a significantly greater change in office SBP than those receiving sham; -15.2 ± 23.5 vs. -8.6 ± 24.8 mmHg, respectively (P = 0.012). Greater reductions in office and ambulatory SBP, and heart rate were observed with a higher number of ablations and energy delivery in a four-quadrant pattern.
Post hoc analyses, although derived from limited patient cohorts, reveal several potential confounding factors that may partially explain the unexpected blood pressure responses in both the sham control and RDN groups. These hypothesis-generating data further inform the design of subsequent research to evaluate the potential role of RDN in the treatment of resistant hypertension. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT01418261.
SYMPLICITY HTN-3随机、双盲、假手术对照试验证实了肾去神经支配术(RDN)的安全性,但未达到其主要疗效终点。既往RDN研究已证明血压能显著且持久地降低。本分析调查了可能有助于解释这些不同结果的因素。
顽固性高血压患者按2:1随机分为RDN组(n = 364)或假手术组(n = 171)。主要终点为6个月时诊室收缩压(SBP)变化的差异。多变量分析确定了SBP变化的预测因素。额外分析检查了药物变化的影响、选定亚组的结果和手术因素。在随机分组至6个月终点期间,39%的患者进行了药物调整。6个月时诊室SBP降低的预测因素为基线诊室SBP≥180 mmHg、使用醛固酮拮抗剂以及未使用血管扩张剂;消融次数是RDN组的一个预测因素。接受RDN的非非裔美国患者诊室SBP的变化显著大于接受假手术的患者;分别为-15.2±23.5 mmHg和-8.6±24.8 mmHg(P = 0.012)。采用四象限模式进行更多次数的消融和能量传递时,诊室和动态SBP以及心率的降低幅度更大。
事后分析虽然来自有限的患者队列,但揭示了几个潜在的混杂因素,这些因素可能部分解释了假手术对照组和RDN组中意外的血压反应。这些产生假设的数据进一步为后续研究的设计提供了信息,以评估RDN在顽固性高血压治疗中的潜在作用。临床试验注册编号:NCT01418261。