Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Jichi Medical University School of Medicine, Tochigi, Japan.
Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Hypertens Res. 2024 Oct;47(10):2745-2759. doi: 10.1038/s41440-024-01739-y. Epub 2024 Jun 3.
The efficacy of renal denervation (RDN) has been controversial, but recent randomized sham-controlled trials demonstrated significant blood pressure reductions after RDN in patients with hypertension. We conducted a systematic review and updated meta-analysis to evaluate the effects of RDN on ambulatory and office blood pressures in patients with hypertension. Databases were searched up to 15 November 2023 to identify randomized, sham-controlled trials of RDN. The primary endpoint was change in 24 h ambulatory systolic blood pressure (SBP) with RDN versus sham control. The secondary endpoints were changes in 24 h ambulatory diastolic blood pressure, daytime and nighttime blood pressure (BP), office BP, and home BP. A sub-analysis determined outcomes by medication, procedure, and device. From twelve trials, 2222 patients with hypertension were randomized to undergo RDN (n = 1295) or a sham procedure (n = 927). At 2-6 months after treatment, RDN significantly reduced 24 h ambulatory SBP by 2.81 mmHg (95% confidence interval: -4.09, -1.53; p < 0.001) compared with the sham procedure. RDN also reduced daytime SBP by 3.17 mmHg (- 4.75, - 1.58; p < 0.001), nighttime SBP by 3.41 mmHg (- 4.69, - 2.13; p < 0.001), office SBP by 4.95 mmHg (- 6.37, - 3.54; p < 0.001), and home SBP by 4.64 mmHg (- 7.44, - 1.84; p = 0.001) versus the sham control group. There were no significant differences in the magnitude of BP reduction between first- and second-generation trials, between devices, or between with or without medication. These data from randomized sham-controlled trials showed that RDN significantly reduced all blood pressure metrics in medicated or unmedicated patients with hypertension, including resistant/uncontrolled hypertension.
肾去神经术(RDN)的疗效一直存在争议,但最近的随机假手术对照试验表明,高血压患者接受 RDN 后血压明显降低。我们进行了系统评价和更新的荟萃分析,以评估 RDN 对高血压患者的动态和诊室血压的影响。数据库检索截至 2023 年 11 月 15 日,以确定 RDN 的随机、假手术对照试验。主要终点是 RDN 与假手术对照相比 24 小时动态收缩压(SBP)的变化。次要终点是 24 小时动态舒张压、白天和夜间血压(BP)、诊室血压和家庭血压的变化。亚分析根据药物、程序和设备确定结果。从 12 项试验中,2222 名高血压患者被随机分为接受 RDN(n=1295)或假手术程序(n=927)。治疗后 2-6 个月,RDN 显著降低 24 小时动态 SBP2.81mmHg(95%置信区间:-4.09,-1.53;p<0.001)与假手术相比。RDN 还降低了日间 SBP3.17mmHg(-4.75,-1.58;p<0.001),夜间 SBP3.41mmHg(-4.69,-2.13;p<0.001),诊室 SBP4.95mmHg(-6.37,-3.54;p<0.001)和家庭 SBP4.64mmHg(-7.44,-1.84;p=0.001)与假手术对照组相比。第一代和第二代试验、不同设备之间或有或无药物治疗之间的 BP 降低幅度没有显著差异。这些来自随机假手术对照试验的数据表明,RDN 显著降低了接受或未接受药物治疗的高血压患者的所有血压指标,包括耐药/未控制的高血压。