Kim Jeong Tae, Jeong Hye Won, Choi Ki Hwa, Yoon Tae Young, Sung Nohyun, Choi Young Ki, Kim Eun Ha, Chae Hee Bok
Jeong Tae Kim, Hye Won Jeong, Hee Bok Chae, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine and Medical Research Institute, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 361-711, South Korea.
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Nov 14;20(42):15931-6. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i42.15931.
Several clinical trials have demonstrated the potent antiviral efficacy of entecavir (ETV), and this relatively new nucleoside analogue drug has rapidly become a frequently prescribed therapy for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) worldwide. While the studies have also shown a good overall safety profile for ETV, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in patients with advanced cirrhosis have been reported and represent a broad spectrum of drug-induced injuries, including lactic acidosis, myalgia, neuropathy, azotemia, hypophosphatemia, muscular weakness, and pancreatitis, as well as immune-mediated responses (i.e., allergic reactions). Cutaneous ADRs associated with ETV are very rare, with only two case reports in the publicly available literature; both of these cases were classified as unspecified hypersensitivity allergic (type I) ADR, but neither were reported as pathologically proven or as evaluated by cytokine release analysis. Here, we report the case of a 45-year-old woman who presented with a generalized maculopapular rash after one week of ETV treatment for lamivudine-resistant CHB. The patient reported having experienced a similar skin eruption during a previous three-month regimen of ETV, for which she had self-discontinued the medication. Histopathological analysis of a skin biopsy showed acanthotic epidermis with focal parakeratosis and a perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate admixed with interstitial eosinophils in the papillary and reticular dermis, consistent with a diagnosis of drug sensitivity. A lymphocyte stimulation test showed significantly enhanced IL-4, indicating a classification of type IVb delayed hypersensitivity. The patient was switched to an adefovir-lamivudine combination regimen and the skin eruption resolved two weeks after the ETV withdrawal. This case represents the first pathologically and immunologically evidenced ETV-induced delayed type hypersensitivity skin reaction reported to date. Physicians should be aware of the potential, although rare, for cutaneous ADRs associated with ETV treatment.
多项临床试验已证明恩替卡韦(ETV)具有强大的抗病毒疗效,这种相对较新的核苷类似物药物已迅速成为全球慢性乙型肝炎(CHB)常用的治疗药物。虽然研究也显示ETV总体安全性良好,但已有晚期肝硬化患者出现药物不良反应(ADR)的报道,这些不良反应表现为广泛的药物性损伤,包括乳酸酸中毒、肌痛、神经病变、氮质血症、低磷血症、肌肉无力和胰腺炎,以及免疫介导反应(即过敏反应)。与ETV相关的皮肤ADR非常罕见,公开文献中仅有两例病例报告;这两例均被归类为未明确的超敏性过敏(I型)ADR,但均未报告经病理证实或通过细胞因子释放分析评估。在此,我们报告一例45岁女性患者,该患者在接受ETV治疗拉米夫定耐药CHB一周后出现全身性斑丘疹。患者报告在之前为期三个月的ETV治疗期间曾出现类似皮疹,为此她自行停药。皮肤活检的组织病理学分析显示棘层肥厚的表皮伴有局灶性角化不全,在乳头层和网状真皮层有血管周围淋巴细胞浸润并伴有间质嗜酸性粒细胞,符合药物敏感性诊断。淋巴细胞刺激试验显示IL-4显著升高,表明为IVb型迟发性超敏反应。患者改用阿德福韦 - 拉米夫定联合治疗方案,停药两周后皮疹消退。该病例是迄今为止报道的首例经病理和免疫证实的ETV诱导的迟发性超敏性皮肤反应。医生应意识到与ETV治疗相关的皮肤ADR虽罕见但存在可能性。