Division of General Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Jan;175(1):67-75. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.5830.
Cardiac biomarker testing is not routinely indicated in the emergency department (ED) because of low utility and potential downstream harms from false-positive results. However, current rates of testing are unknown.
To determine the use of cardiac biomarker testing overall, as well as stratified by disposition status and selected characteristics.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective study of ED visits by adults (≥18 years old) selected from the 2009 and 2010 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, a probability sample of ED visits in the United States.
Selected patient, visit, and ED characteristics.
Receipt of cardiac biomarker testing during the ED visit.
Of 44,448 ED visits, cardiac biomarkers were tested in 16.9% of visits, representing 28.6 million visits. Biomarker testing occurred in 8.2% of visits in the absence of acute coronary syndrome (ACS)-related symptoms, representing 8.5 million visits, almost one-third of all visits with biomarker testing. Among individuals subsequently hospitalized, cardiac biomarkers were tested in 47.0% of all visits. In this group, biomarkers were tested in 35.4% of visits despite the absence of ACS-related symptoms. Among all ED visits, the number of other tests or services performed was the strongest predictor of biomarker testing independent of symptoms of ACS. Compared with 0 to 5 other tests or services performed, more than 10 other tests or services performed was associated with 59.55 (95% CI, 39.23-90.40) times the odds of biomarker testing. The adjusted probabilities of biomarker testing if 0 to 5, 6 to 10, or more than 10 other tests or services performed were 6.3%, 34.3%, and 62.3%, respectively.
Cardiac biomarker testing in the ED is common even among those without symptoms suggestive of ACS. Cardiac biomarker testing is also frequently used during visits with a high volume of other tests or services independent of the clinical presentation. More attention is needed to develop strategies for appropriate use of cardiac biomarkers.
由于心脏生物标志物检测的实用性较低,且假阳性结果可能带来潜在的下游危害,因此在急诊科(ED)通常不建议进行心脏生物标志物检测。然而,目前的检测率尚不清楚。
总体上确定心脏生物标志物检测的使用情况,以及按处置状态和选定特征进行分层的情况。
设计、设置和参与者:这是一项回顾性研究,选取了 2009 年和 2010 年美国全国医院门诊医疗调查中的成年人(≥18 岁)ED 就诊,这是美国 ED 就诊的概率样本。
选择患者、就诊和 ED 特征。
在 ED 就诊期间接受心脏生物标志物检测的情况。
在 44448 次 ED 就诊中,有 16.9%的就诊进行了心脏生物标志物检测,共涉及 2860 万次就诊。在没有急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)相关症状的情况下,有 8.2%的就诊进行了生物标志物检测,共涉及 850 万次就诊,几乎占所有进行生物标志物检测就诊的三分之一。在随后住院的患者中,有 47.0%的就诊进行了心脏生物标志物检测。在这一组中,尽管没有 ACS 相关症状,但有 35.4%的就诊进行了生物标志物检测。在所有 ED 就诊中,与 ACS 相关症状无关,进行的其他检查或服务数量是预测生物标志物检测的最强因素。与进行 0 至 5 次其他检查或服务相比,进行超过 10 次其他检查或服务与进行生物标志物检测的几率增加 59.55 倍(95%CI,39.23-90.40)相关。如果进行 0 至 5、6 至 10 或超过 10 次其他检查或服务,进行生物标志物检测的调整后概率分别为 6.3%、34.3%和 62.3%。
即使在没有提示 ACS 症状的患者中,ED 中也经常进行心脏生物标志物检测。即使在就诊时进行了大量其他检查或服务,且临床表现不典型,也经常进行心脏生物标志物检测。需要更多关注制定策略以适当使用心脏生物标志物。