Levine Sheen S, Apfelbaum Evan P, Bernard Mark, Bartelt Valerie L, Zajac Edward J, Stark David
Institute for Social and Economic Research and Policy and Naveen Jindal School of Management, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75080;
Work and Organization Studies, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02142;
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Dec 30;111(52):18524-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1407301111. Epub 2014 Nov 17.
Markets are central to modern society, so their failures can be devastating. Here, we examine a prominent failure: price bubbles. Bubbles emerge when traders err collectively in pricing, causing misfit between market prices and the true values of assets. The causes of such collective errors remain elusive. We propose that bubbles are affected by ethnic homogeneity in the market and can be thwarted by diversity. In homogenous markets, traders place undue confidence in the decisions of others. Less likely to scrutinize others' decisions, traders are more likely to accept prices that deviate from true values. To test this, we constructed experimental markets in Southeast Asia and North America, where participants traded stocks to earn money. We randomly assigned participants to ethnically homogeneous or diverse markets. We find a marked difference: Across markets and locations, market prices fit true values 58% better in diverse markets. The effect is similar across sites, despite sizeable differences in culture and ethnic composition. Specifically, in homogenous markets, overpricing is higher as traders are more likely to accept speculative prices. Their pricing errors are more correlated than in diverse markets. In addition, when bubbles burst, homogenous markets crash more severely. The findings suggest that price bubbles arise not only from individual errors or financial conditions, but also from the social context of decision making. The evidence may inform public discussion on ethnic diversity: it may be beneficial not only for providing variety in perspectives and skills, but also because diversity facilitates friction that enhances deliberation and upends conformity.
市场是现代社会的核心,因此市场失灵可能具有毁灭性。在此,我们考察一种突出的失灵现象:价格泡沫。当交易者在定价时集体犯错,导致市场价格与资产真实价值不符时,泡沫就会出现。这种集体错误的原因仍然难以捉摸。我们提出,泡沫受到市场中种族同质性的影响,而多样性可以抑制泡沫。在同质化市场中,交易者对他人的决策过度自信。由于不太可能仔细审查他人的决策,交易者更有可能接受偏离真实价值的价格。为了验证这一点,我们在东南亚和北美构建了实验性市场,让参与者通过交易股票赚钱。我们将参与者随机分配到种族同质化或多样化的市场。我们发现了一个显著差异:在不同市场和地点,多样化市场中市场价格与真实价值的契合度要高出58%。尽管文化和种族构成存在相当大的差异,但各地点的效果相似。具体而言,在同质化市场中,由于交易者更有可能接受投机性价格,所以定价过高的情况更为严重。他们的定价错误比在多样化市场中更具相关性。此外,当泡沫破裂时,同质化市场的崩溃更为严重。研究结果表明,价格泡沫不仅源于个体错误或金融状况,还源于决策的社会背景。这一证据可能为关于种族多样性的公众讨论提供参考:它可能不仅有利于提供观点和技能的多样性,还因为多样性会促进摩擦,从而加强审议并打破从众行为。