• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

头痛领域职业发展障碍的认知:一项基于全球网络的横断面调查。

Perceived barriers to career progression in the headache field: A global web-based cross-sectional survey.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Headache Unit, IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, Italy.

出版信息

Cephalalgia. 2022 Dec;42(14):1498-1509. doi: 10.1177/03331024221123081. Epub 2022 Sep 7.

DOI:10.1177/03331024221123081
PMID:36071614
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9693724/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

It is well recognized that underrepresented and minoritized groups do not have the same career opportunities. However, there are limited data on the range and specifics of potential barriers that withhold people in headache medicine and science from reaching their full potential. Moreover, people from different geographical regions often perceive different challenges. We aimed to identify world-wide perceived career barriers and possibilities for promoting equality amongst professionals in the headache fields.

METHODS

A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among professionals in the field of headache globally. The questions of the survey were aimed at assessing perceived career barriers in four domains: professional recognition, opportunities in scientific societies, clinical practice, and salary and compensation. Perceived mentorship was also assessed.

RESULTS

In total 580 responders completed the survey (55.3% women). Gender was the most important perceived barrier in almost all domains. Additionally, country of birth emerged as an important barrier to participation in international scientific societies. Career barriers varied across world regions.

CONCLUSION

It is essential that longstanding and ongoing disparities by gender and country of origin for professionals in the headache field are globally acknowledged and addressed in areas of recruitment, retention, opportunities, mentor- and sponsorships, and advancement.

摘要

背景

人们普遍认识到,代表性不足和少数群体没有相同的职业机会。然而,关于阻碍头痛医学和科学领域的人充分发挥潜力的潜在障碍的范围和具体细节的数据有限。此外,来自不同地区的人往往会感受到不同的挑战。我们旨在确定全球范围内人们认为的职业障碍,并寻找在头痛领域促进专业人士平等的可能性。

方法

在全球范围内对头痛领域的专业人员进行了横断面在线调查。调查的问题旨在评估四个领域的职业障碍:专业认可、科学协会的机会、临床实践以及薪酬和补偿。还评估了感知到的指导关系。

结果

共有 580 名受访者完成了调查(女性占 55.3%)。在几乎所有领域,性别都是最重要的感知障碍。此外,出生国是参与国际科学协会的一个重要障碍。职业障碍因世界区域而异。

结论

必须在头痛领域的专业人员的招聘、留用、机会、导师和赞助以及晋升等方面,全球范围内承认和解决长期存在且持续存在的性别和原籍国差异问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02de/9693724/5cbd99adb34a/10.1177_03331024221123081-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02de/9693724/9c660ae8b76a/10.1177_03331024221123081-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02de/9693724/513bcb8f33a7/10.1177_03331024221123081-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02de/9693724/91f31212ab90/10.1177_03331024221123081-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02de/9693724/5cbd99adb34a/10.1177_03331024221123081-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02de/9693724/9c660ae8b76a/10.1177_03331024221123081-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02de/9693724/513bcb8f33a7/10.1177_03331024221123081-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02de/9693724/91f31212ab90/10.1177_03331024221123081-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02de/9693724/5cbd99adb34a/10.1177_03331024221123081-fig4.jpg

相似文献

1
Perceived barriers to career progression in the headache field: A global web-based cross-sectional survey.头痛领域职业发展障碍的认知:一项基于全球网络的横断面调查。
Cephalalgia. 2022 Dec;42(14):1498-1509. doi: 10.1177/03331024221123081. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
2
Cross-sectional analysis of women in neurosurgery: a Canadian perspective.神经外科领域女性的横断面分析:加拿大视角
Neurosurg Focus. 2021 Mar;50(3):E13. doi: 10.3171/2020.12.FOCUS20959.
3
Barriers to Women Entering Surgical Careers: A Global Study into Medical Student Perceptions.阻碍女性进入外科职业领域的因素:一项针对医学生看法的全球研究。
World J Surg. 2020 Jan;44(1):37-44. doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-05199-1.
4
Gender Disparities in Mentorship and Career Outcomes in Ophthalmology.眼科学领域中的导师制和职业成果的性别差异。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2024 Aug;33(8):1120-1127. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2023.0876. Epub 2024 Apr 18.
5
The Glass Ceiling in Global Health: Perspectives of Female and Male Anesthesiologists.全球卫生领域的玻璃天花板:女性和男性麻醉医师的观点
Anesth Analg. 2024 Aug 12. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000007142.
6
Advancing Women Leaders in Global Health: Getting to Solutions.推动全球卫生领域的女性领导者:寻找解决方案。
Ann Glob Health. 2018 Nov 5;84(4):743-752. doi: 10.9204/aogh.2384.
7
Building an Equitable Surgical Training Pipeline: Leadership Exposure for the Advancement of Gender and Underrepresented Minority Equity in Surgery (LEAGUES).建立公平的外科培训管道:提升手术中性别和少数族裔公平的领导力机会(LEAGUES)。
J Surg Educ. 2021 Sep-Oct;78(5):1413-1418. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2021.01.017. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
8
Perceptions Regarding Mentorship Among General Surgery Trainees With Academic Career Intentions.有学术职业意向的普通外科受训者对指导关系的看法。
J Surg Educ. 2019 Jul-Aug;76(4):916-923. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.12.006. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
9
Factors Affecting Women Surgeons' Careers in Low-Middle-Income Countries: An International Survey.影响中低收入国家女外科医生职业发展的因素:一项国际调查。
World J Surg. 2021 Feb;45(2):362-368. doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05811-9. Epub 2020 Oct 10.
10
Gender Discrimination, Career Aspirations, and Access to Mentorship Among Medical Students in Brazil.巴西医学生中的性别歧视、职业抱负和获得指导机会。
J Surg Res. 2022 Nov;279:702-711. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.06.064. Epub 2022 Aug 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of Mentoring on Academic Career Success for Women in Medicine: A Systematic Review.指导对医学领域女性学术职业成功的影响:一项系统综述。
Acad Med. 2022 Mar 1;97(3):444-458. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004563.
2
The Need for Allyship in Achieving Gender Equity in Gastroenterology.在胃肠病学领域实现性别平等中对盟友关系的需求。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2021 Dec 1;116(12):2321-2323. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001508.
3
Six ways to get a grip by calling-out racism and enacting allyship in medical education.在医学教育中通过揭露种族主义和践行盟友关系来掌控局面的六种方法。
Can Med Educ J. 2021 Sep 14;12(4):111-115. doi: 10.36834/cmej.71566. eCollection 2021 Sep.
4
Women less likely to win major research awards.女性获得重大研究奖项的可能性较小。
Nature. 2021 Sep 13. doi: 10.1038/d41586-021-02497-4.
5
Quotas and Gender Competence: Independent or Complementary Approaches to Gender Equality?配额与性别能力:实现性别平等的独立方法还是互补方法?
Front Sociol. 2021 Aug 27;6:740462. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2021.740462. eCollection 2021.
6
Gender Disparity in Citations in High-Impact Journal Articles.高影响力期刊文章中的引文存在性别差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jul 1;4(7):e2114509. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.14509.
7
Gender and racial trends among neurology residents: an overview.神经科住院医师中的性别和种族趋势:概述。
Postgrad Med J. 2022 Aug;98(1162):572-574. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2020-139176. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
8
Women Physicians and Promotion in Academic Medicine.女医师与学术医学的晋升
N Engl J Med. 2020 Nov 26;383(22):2148-2157. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1916935.
9
Representation of women plenary speakers at the American Academy of Neurology Annual Meeting.美国神经病学学会年会上女性全体演讲者代表。
Neurology. 2020 Dec 1;95(22):e3045-e3059. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000011058. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
10
Factors impacting on retention, success and equitable participation in clinical academic careers: a scoping review and meta-thematic synthesis.影响临床学术职业保留、成功和公平参与的因素:范围综述和元主题综合分析。
BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 25;10(3):e033480. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033480.