• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无感知觉意识下认知控制的直接证据。

Direct evidence of cognitive control without perceptual awareness.

作者信息

Ocampo Brenda, Al-Janabi Shahd, Finkbeiner Matthew

机构信息

School of Psychology, Australian Catholic University, Brisbane, 4014, QLD, Australia,

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Aug;22(4):1083-8. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0766-3.

DOI:10.3758/s13423-014-0766-3
PMID:25404552
Abstract

A central question within the domain of human cognition is whether or not the ability to replace a current action with a new one (i.e., cognitive control) depends on a conscious appreciation of the environmental change that necessitates the new behavior. Specifically, it is not yet known if non-consciously perceived stimuli can trigger the modification of a currently ongoing action. We show for the first time that individuals are able to use non-consciously perceived information to modify the course and outcome of an ongoing action. Participants were presented with a masked (i.e., subliminal) 'stop' or 'go-on' prime stimulus whilst performing a routine reach-to-touch action. Despite being invisible to participants, the stop primes produced more hesitations mid-flight and more movement reversals than the go-on primes. This new evidence directly establishes that cognitive control (i.e., the ability to modify a currently ongoing action) does not depend on a conscious appreciation of the environmental trigger.

摘要

人类认知领域的一个核心问题是,用新行为取代当前行为的能力(即认知控制)是否依赖于对需要新行为的环境变化的有意识认知。具体而言,目前尚不清楚非意识感知的刺激是否能触发对当前正在进行的行为的修改。我们首次表明,个体能够利用非意识感知的信息来修改正在进行的行为的过程和结果。在参与者执行常规的伸手触摸动作时,向他们呈现一个被掩盖的(即阈下的)“停止”或“继续”启动刺激。尽管参与者看不见这些刺激,但与“继续”启动刺激相比,“停止”启动刺激在动作过程中产生了更多犹豫和更多动作反转。这一新证据直接表明,认知控制(即修改当前正在进行的行为的能力)并不依赖于对环境触发因素的有意识认知。

相似文献

1
Direct evidence of cognitive control without perceptual awareness.无感知觉意识下认知控制的直接证据。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Aug;22(4):1083-8. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0766-3.
2
Repeating a strongly masked stimulus increases priming and awareness.重复一个经过强烈掩蔽的刺激会增加启动和意识。
Conscious Cogn. 2013 Dec;22(4):1422-30. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2013.09.011. Epub 2013 Oct 25.
3
Unconscious and out of control: subliminal priming is insensitive to observer expectations.无意识且失控:潜意识启动对观察者的期望不敏感。
Conscious Cogn. 2013 Sep;22(3):716-28. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2013.04.011. Epub 2013 May 21.
4
Boundary conditions for the influence of unfamiliar non-target primes in unconscious evaluative priming: The moderating role of attentional task sets.无意识评价性启动中陌生非目标启动影响的边界条件:注意任务集的调节作用。
Conscious Cogn. 2015 Sep;35:342-56. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2015.01.010. Epub 2015 Feb 10.
5
Subliminal understanding of negation: unconscious control by subliminal processing of word pairs.潜意识对否定的理解:通过对词对的潜意识处理进行无意识控制。
Conscious Cogn. 2013 Sep;22(3):1022-40. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2013.06.010. Epub 2013 Aug 7.
6
Conscious and unconscious proportion effects in masked priming.掩蔽启动中的意识和无意识比例效应
Conscious Cogn. 2008 Dec;17(4):1345-58. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2007.08.005. Epub 2007 Oct 4.
7
Subliminal Gestalt grouping: evidence of perceptual grouping by proximity and similarity in absence of conscious perception.潜意识格式塔分组:无意识知觉条件下,通过邻近性和相似性进行知觉分组的证据。
Conscious Cogn. 2014 Apr;25:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2014.01.004. Epub 2014 Feb 8.
8
The relationship between the objective identification threshold and priming effects does not provide a definitive boundary between conscious and unconscious perceptual processes.客观识别阈限与启动效应之间的关系并不能为意识和无意识感知过程之间提供明确的界限。
Conscious Cogn. 2011 Dec;20(4):1221-31. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2011.03.016. Epub 2011 Apr 9.
9
Links between conscious awareness and response inhibition: evidence from masked priming.意识觉知与反应抑制之间的联系:来自掩蔽启动效应的证据。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2002 Sep;9(3):514-20. doi: 10.3758/bf03196307.
10
Conscious contributions to subliminal priming.对阈下启动效应的有意识贡献。
Conscious Cogn. 2008 Mar;17(1):72-83. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2006.10.003. Epub 2006 Nov 28.

引用本文的文献

1
A direct effect of perception on action when grasping a cup.当抓握杯子时,感知对动作的直接影响。
Sci Rep. 2018 Jan 9;8(1):171. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-18591-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Automatic online control of motor adjustments in reaching and grasping.自动在线控制在伸手和抓握中的电机调整。
Neuropsychologia. 2014 Mar;55:25-40. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.12.005. Epub 2013 Dec 13.
2
Arm trajectory modifications during reaching towards visual targets.手臂在向视觉目标移动过程中的轨迹修正。
J Cogn Neurosci. 1991 Summer;3(3):220-30. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1991.3.3.220.
3
Pointing the way to new constraints on the dynamical claims of computational models.为计算模型的动力学主张的新约束指明方向。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Feb;40(1):172-85. doi: 10.1037/a0033169. Epub 2013 Jun 10.
4
Unconsciously triggered conflict adaptation.无意识触发的冲突适应。
PLoS One. 2010 Jul 9;5(7):e11508. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011508.
5
Unconscious activation of the prefrontal no-go network.前额叶禁止网络的无意识激活。
J Neurosci. 2010 Mar 17;30(11):4143-50. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2992-09.2010.
6
Unconscious priming of a no-go response.无意识的禁止反应启动。
Psychophysiology. 2009 Nov;46(6):1258-69. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00873.x. Epub 2009 Aug 17.
7
Dissociating consciousness from inhibitory control: evidence for unconsciously triggered response inhibition in the stop-signal task.将意识与抑制控制分离:停止信号任务中无意识触发反应抑制的证据。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Aug;35(4):1129-39. doi: 10.1037/a0013551.
8
The conscious access hypothesis: origins and recent evidence.意识通达假说:起源与近期证据
Trends Cogn Sci. 2002 Jan 1;6(1):47-52. doi: 10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01819-2.
9
Towards a cognitive neuroscience of consciousness: basic evidence and a workspace framework.迈向意识的认知神经科学:基础证据与工作空间框架。
Cognition. 2001 Apr;79(1-2):1-37. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(00)00123-2.
10
Kinematic properties of rapid hand movements in a knob turning task.旋钮转动任务中快速手部动作的运动学特性。
Exp Brain Res. 2000 Jun;132(4):419-33. doi: 10.1007/s002210000366.