Suppr超能文献

在 COPD 患者中,比较与单一成分和安慰剂的疗效和安全性,溴化阿地铵/富马酸福莫特罗固定剂量复方制剂(ACLIFORM-COPD):一项多中心、随机研究。

Efficacy and safety of aclidinium bromide/formoterol fumarate fixed-dose combinations compared with individual components and placebo in patients with COPD (ACLIFORM-COPD): a multicentre, randomised study.

机构信息

University of Manchester, Medicines Evaluation Unit, Langley Building, University Hospital of South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Southmoor Road, Manchester M23 9QZ, UK.

出版信息

BMC Pulm Med. 2014 Nov 18;14:178. doi: 10.1186/1471-2466-14-178.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Aclidinium/formoterol is a twice-daily (BID) fixed-dose combination (FDC) in development for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The efficacy and safety of aclidinium/formoterol versus monotherapy and placebo in patients with COPD was assessed.

METHODS

In this 24-week double-blind, parallel-group, active- and placebo-controlled, multicentre Phase III study, patients (≥40 years, post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1]/forced vital capacity <70% and FEV1 ≥30% but <80% predicted normal) were randomised 2:2:2:2:1 to aclidinium/formoterol 400/12 μg (n = 385) or 400/6 μg (n = 381), aclidinium 400 μg (n = 385), formoterol 12 μg (n = 384) or placebo (n = 194) BID via Genuair®/Pressair®a.

RESULTS

At Week 24, aclidinium/formoterol 400/12 μg and 400/6 μg lead to significant improvements from baseline in 1-hour post-dose FEV1 versus aclidinium (125 mL [95% CI: 90, 160; p < 0 · 001] and 69 mL [95% CI: 34, 105; p < 0.001], respectively) and trough FEV1 versus formoterol (85 mL [95% CI: 51, 119; p < 0.001] and 53 mL [95% CI: 19, 87; p < 0.01], respectively; co-primary endpoints). Additionally, aclidinium/formoterol 400/12 μg and 400/6 μg provided significant improvements in Transition Dyspnoea Index (TDI) focal score versus placebo (1.29 units [95% CI: 0.73, 1.86; p < 0.001] and 1.16 units [95% CI: 0.59, 1.73; p < 0.001], respectively; secondary endpoint). All treatments were well tolerated, with safety profiles of the FDCs similar to those of placebo and monotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Both aclidinium/formoterol BID doses significantly improved bronchodilation versus monotherapy, and dyspnoea versus placebo, with no increase in safety risk. Aclidinium/formoterol may be an effective treatment for patients with COPD.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01462942.

摘要

背景

阿地溴铵/福莫特罗是一种每日两次(BID)固定剂量复方制剂(FDC),目前正在开发用于慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)。本研究评估了阿地溴铵/福莫特罗在 COPD 患者中的疗效和安全性,与单药治疗和安慰剂进行了比较。

方法

在这项为期 24 周、双盲、平行分组、阳性药物和安慰剂对照、多中心的 III 期研究中,患者(≥40 岁,支气管扩张剂后 1 秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)/用力肺活量 <70%,且 FEV1≥30%但 <80%预计正常)随机按 2:2:2:2:1 比例接受阿地溴铵/福莫特罗 400/12 μg(n=385)或 400/6 μg(n=381)、阿地溴铵 400 μg(n=385)、福莫特罗 12 μg(n=384)或安慰剂(n=194)BID,通过 Genuair®/Pressair®给药。

结果

在第 24 周,阿地溴铵/福莫特罗 400/12 μg 和 400/6 μg 与阿地溴铵相比,1 小时后剂量的 FEV1 显著改善(分别为 125 mL[95%CI:90,160;p<0.001]和 69 mL[95%CI:34,105;p<0.001])和谷值 FEV1 与福莫特罗相比(分别为 85 mL[95%CI:51,119;p<0.001]和 53 mL[95%CI:19,87;p<0.01]),这是主要疗效终点。此外,阿地溴铵/福莫特罗 400/12 μg 和 400/6 μg 与安慰剂相比,在过渡性呼吸困难指数(TDI)焦点评分方面也显著改善(分别为 1.29 单位[95%CI:0.73,1.86;p<0.001]和 1.16 单位[95%CI:0.59,1.73;p<0.001]),这是次要疗效终点。所有治疗均耐受良好,FDC 的安全性与安慰剂和单药治疗相似。

结论

阿地溴铵/福莫特罗 BID 两种剂量均显著改善了与单药治疗相比的支气管扩张作用,与安慰剂相比呼吸困难也得到改善,且安全性风险没有增加。阿地溴铵/福莫特罗可能是治疗 COPD 患者的有效药物。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT01462942。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/841e/4273456/6dab2be6e80e/12890_2014_628_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验