Donohue James F, Soong Weily, Wu Xiao, Shrestha Pomy, Lei Alejhandra
Division of Pulmonary Medicine, University of North Carolina, 130 Mason Farm Rd Suite 4124, Chapel Hill NC27599, USA.
Clinical Research Center of Alabama, 504 Brookwood Boulevard, Suite 250, Birmingham, AL 35209, USA.
Respir Med. 2016 Jul;116:41-8. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2016.05.007. Epub 2016 May 7.
This was a one-year, Phase III randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, active-control study investigating the long-term safety and tolerability of twice-daily aclidinium 400 μg/formoterol 12 μg versus formoterol 12 μg.
Eligible patients were male or female, current or ex-smokers (history of ≥10 pack-years) aged ≥40 years with a diagnosis of moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)/forced vital capacity (FVC) ratio <70%, and post-bronchodilator FEV1≥30% and <80% predicted. Patients were randomized 2:1 to twice-daily aclidinium 400 μg/formoterol 12 μg or formoterol 12 μg, administered via a multidose dry powder inhaler (Genuair™/Pressair(®))(1). The objective was to evaluate the one-year safety of aclidinium 400 μg/formoterol 12 μg versus formoterol 12 μg.
All 590 patients were included in the safety population; 392 patients received aclidinium 400 μg/formoterol 12 μg and 198 patients received formoterol 12 μg. Of these, 581 patients were included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population (385 patients received aclidinium 400 μg/formoterol 12 μg; 196 patients received formoterol 12 μg). In the safety population, the percentage of patients with ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event was similar between aclidinium 400 μg/formoterol 12 μg (71.4%) and formoterol 12 μg (65.7%). Mean baseline post-bronchodilator FEV1 was 51.3% of predicted (ITT population). Aclidinium 400 μg/formoterol 12 μg significantly improved morning pre-dose (trough) FEV1 and trough FVC versus formoterol 12 μg at each assessment, with improvements at Week 1 (least squares mean difference [LSMD]: 87.4 mL and 157.8 mL, respectively) maintained at study end (LSMD: 81.5 mL and 185.4 mL, respectively).
Aclidinium 400 μg/formoterol 12 μg was well tolerated, with a safety profile similar to formoterol 12 μg and consistent with that seen in two Phase III studies. Additionally, aclidinium 400 μg/formoterol 12 μg improved lung function versus formoterol 12 μg, with a sustained effect over one year.
这是一项为期一年的III期随机、双盲、平行组、活性对照研究,旨在调查每日两次吸入400μg阿地溴铵/12μg福莫特罗与12μg福莫特罗相比的长期安全性和耐受性。
符合条件的患者为年龄≥40岁的男性或女性,当前吸烟者或既往吸烟者(吸烟史≥10包年),诊断为中度至重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD):支气管扩张剂后1秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)/用力肺活量(FVC)比值<70%,且支气管扩张剂后FEV1≥预计值的30%且<80%。患者按2:1随机分为每日两次吸入400μg阿地溴铵/12μg福莫特罗或12μg福莫特罗,通过多剂量干粉吸入器(Genuair™/Pressair(®))给药(1)。目的是评估400μg阿地溴铵/12μg福莫特罗与12μg福莫特罗相比的一年安全性。
所有590例患者均纳入安全性分析人群;392例患者接受400μg阿地溴铵/12μg福莫特罗,198例患者接受12μg福莫特罗。其中,581例患者纳入意向性分析(ITT)人群(385例患者接受400μg阿地溴铵/12μg福莫特罗;196例患者接受12μg福莫特罗)。在安全性分析人群中,400μg阿地溴铵/12μg福莫特罗组(71.4%)和12μg福莫特罗组(65.7%)中发生≥1次治疗期间出现的不良事件的患者百分比相似。ITT人群中支气管扩张剂后FEV1的平均基线值为预计值的51.3%。在每次评估时,400μg阿地溴铵/12μg福莫特罗较12μg福莫特罗显著改善了晨起给药前(谷值)FEV1和谷值FVC,第1周时的改善(最小二乘均值差异[LSMD]:分别为87.4 mL和157.8 mL)在研究结束时得以维持(LSMD:分别为81.5 mL和185.4 mL)。
400μg阿地溴铵/12μg福莫特罗耐受性良好,安全性与12μg福莫特罗相似,与两项III期研究结果一致。此外,400μg阿地溴铵/12μg福莫特罗较12μg福莫特罗改善了肺功能,且这种效果持续了一年。