Oduwole Olabisi, Meremikwu Martin M, Oyo-Ita Angela, Udoh Ekong E
Institute of Tropical Diseases Research and Prevention, University of Calabar Teaching Hospital (ITDR/P), Calabar, Nigeria.
Evid Based Child Health. 2014 Jun;9(2):401-44. doi: 10.1002/ebch.1970.
Cough causes concern for parents and is a major cause of outpatient visits. It can impact on quality of life, cause anxiety and affect sleep in parents and children. Several remedies, including honey, have been used to alleviate cough symptoms.
To evaluate the effectiveness of honey for acute cough in children in ambulatory settings.
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 4, 2011) which contains the Cochrane Acute Respiratory Infections Group's Specialised Register; MEDLINE (1950 to December week 4, 2011); EMBASE (1990 to January 2012); CINAHL (1981 to January 2012); Web of Science (2000 to January 2012); AMED (1985 to January 2012); LILACS (1982 to January 2012); and CAB abstracts (2009 to January 2012).
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing honey given alone, or in combination with antibiotics, versus nothing, placebo or other over-the-counter (OTC) cough medications to participants aged from two to 18 years for acute cough in ambulatory settings.
Two review authors independently screened search results for eligible studies and extracted data on reported outcomes.
We included two RCTs of high risk of bias involving 265 children. The studies compared the effect of honey with dextromethorphan, diphenhydramine and 'no treatment' on symptomatic relief of cough using the 7-point Likert scale. Honey was better than 'no treatment' in reducing frequency of cough (mean difference (MD) -1.07; 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.53 to -0.60; two studies; 154 participants). Moderate quality evidence suggests honey did not differ significantly from dextromethorphan in reducing cough frequency (MD -0.07; 95% CI -1.07 to 0.94; two studies; 149 participants). Low quality evidence suggests honey may be slightly better than diphenhydramine in reducing cough frequency (MD -0.57; 95% CI -0.90 to -0.24; one study; 80 participants). Adverse events included mild reactions (nervousness, insomnia and hyperactivity) experienced by seven children (9.3%) from the honey group and two (2.7%) from the dextromethorphan group; the difference was not significant (risk ratio (RR) 2.94; 95% Cl 0.74 to 11.71; two studies; 149 participants). Three children (7.5%) in the diphenhydramine group experienced somnolence (RR 0.14; 95% Cl 0.01 to 2.68; one study; 80 participants) but there was no significant difference between honey versus dextromethorphan or honey versus diphenhydramine. No adverse event was reported in the 'no treatment' group.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Honey may be better than 'no treatment' and diphenhydramine in the symptomatic relief of cough but not better than dextromethorphan. There is no strong evidence for or against the use of honey.
咳嗽令家长担忧,是门诊就诊的主要原因。它会影响生活质量,引发焦虑,还会影响家长和孩子的睡眠。包括蜂蜜在内的多种疗法已被用于缓解咳嗽症状。
评估蜂蜜对门诊环境中儿童急性咳嗽的疗效。
我们检索了Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)(2011年第4期《Cochrane图书馆》),其中包含Cochrane急性呼吸道感染小组的专业注册库;MEDLINE(1950年至2011年12月第4周);EMBASE(1990年至2012年1月);CINAHL(1981年至2012年1月);科学引文索引(2000年至2012年1月);医学文摘数据库(1985年至2012年1月);拉丁美洲和加勒比卫生科学数据库(1982年至2012年1月);以及CAB文摘(2009年至2012年1月)。
随机对照试验(RCT),比较单独使用蜂蜜、或与抗生素联合使用,与不治疗、安慰剂或其他非处方(OTC)止咳药物,对2至18岁门诊急性咳嗽参与者的疗效。
两位综述作者独立筛选检索结果以寻找符合条件的研究,并提取报告结局的数据。
我们纳入了两项偏倚风险高的RCT,涉及265名儿童。这些研究使用7点李克特量表比较了蜂蜜与右美沙芬、苯海拉明及“不治疗”对咳嗽症状缓解的效果。在减少咳嗽频率方面,蜂蜜优于“不治疗”(平均差(MD)-1.07;95%置信区间(CI)-1.53至-0.60;两项研究;154名参与者)。中等质量证据表明,在减少咳嗽频率方面,蜂蜜与右美沙芬无显著差异(MD -0.07;95% CI -1.07至0.94;两项研究;149名参与者)。低质量证据表明,在减少咳嗽频率方面,蜂蜜可能略优于苯海拉明(MD -0.57;95% CI -0.90至-0.24;一项研究;80名参与者)。不良事件包括蜂蜜组7名儿童(9.3%)和右美沙芬组2名儿童(2.7%)出现的轻度反应(紧张、失眠和多动);差异不显著(风险比(RR)2.94;95% CI 0.74至11.71;两项研究;149名参与者)。苯海拉明组3名儿童(7.5%)出现嗜睡(RR 0.14;95% CI 0.01至2.68;一项研究;80名参与者),但蜂蜜与右美沙芬或蜂蜜与苯海拉明之间无显著差异。“不治疗”组未报告不良事件。
在咳嗽症状缓解方面,蜂蜜可能优于“不治疗”和苯海拉明,但不比右美沙芬更好。对于蜂蜜的使用,没有强有力的证据支持或反对。