• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项针对癌症患者及康复者的康复服务的成本效用分析。

A cost-utility analysis of a rehabilitation service for people living with and beyond cancer.

作者信息

Round Jeff, Leurent Baptiste, Jones Louise

机构信息

Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Unit, University College London, London, UK.

University College London Comprehensive Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Nov 19;14:558. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0558-5.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-014-0558-5
PMID:25407558
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4245741/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We conducted a wait-list control randomised trial of an outpatient rehabilitation service for people living with and beyond cancer, delivered in a hospice day care unit. We report the results of an economic evaluation undertaken using the trial data.

METHODS

Forty-one participants were recruited into the study. A within-trial stochastic cost-utility analysis was undertaken using Monte-Carlo simulation. The outcome measure for the economic evaluation was quality adjusted life years (QALYs). Costs were measured from the perspective of the NHS and personal social services. Uncertainty in the observed data was captured through probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Scenario analysis was conducted to explore the effects of changing the way QALYs were estimated and adjusting for baseline difference in the population. We also explore assumptions about the length of treatment benefit being maintained.

RESULTS

The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for the base-case analysis was £14,231 per QALY. When QALYs were assumed to change linearly over time, this increased to £20,514 per QALY at three months. Adjusting the estimate of QALYs to account for differences in the population at baseline increased the ICER to £94,748 per QALY at three months. Increasing the assumed length of treatment benefit led to reduced ICERs in all scenarios.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the intervention is likely to be cost-effective in some circumstances, there is considerable uncertainty surrounding the decision to implement the service. Further research, informed by a formal value of information analysis, would reduce this uncertainty.

摘要

背景

我们在一家临终关怀日间护理机构,针对癌症患者及康复期患者开展了一项门诊康复服务的等候名单对照随机试验。我们报告了利用试验数据进行的经济评估结果。

方法

41名参与者被纳入研究。采用蒙特卡洛模拟进行了试验内随机成本效用分析。经济评估的结果指标是质量调整生命年(QALYs)。成本从英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)和个人社会服务的角度进行衡量。通过概率敏感性分析捕捉观测数据中的不确定性。进行情景分析以探讨改变QALYs估计方法以及调整人群基线差异的影响。我们还探讨了关于治疗益处持续时间的假设。

结果

基础案例分析的增量成本效益比(ICER)为每QALY 14,231英镑。假设QALYs随时间呈线性变化,三个月时该比值增至每QALY 20,514英镑。调整QALYs估计值以考虑基线人群差异后,三个月时ICER增至每QALY 94,748英镑。延长假设的治疗益处持续时间会导致所有情景下的ICER降低。

结论

尽管该干预措施在某些情况下可能具有成本效益,但在决定实施该服务方面仍存在相当大的不确定性。通过正式的信息价值分析进行的进一步研究将减少这种不确定性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3978/4245741/691e5f0efb22/12913_2014_558_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3978/4245741/6cb6a045d172/12913_2014_558_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3978/4245741/f4d6fa26ed0d/12913_2014_558_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3978/4245741/691e5f0efb22/12913_2014_558_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3978/4245741/6cb6a045d172/12913_2014_558_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3978/4245741/f4d6fa26ed0d/12913_2014_558_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3978/4245741/691e5f0efb22/12913_2014_558_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A cost-utility analysis of a rehabilitation service for people living with and beyond cancer.一项针对癌症患者及康复者的康复服务的成本效用分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Nov 19;14:558. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0558-5.
2
Topotecan, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin hydrochloride and paclitaxel for second-line or subsequent treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation.拓扑替康、聚乙二醇化脂质体盐酸多柔比星和紫杉醇用于晚期卵巢癌二线或后续治疗:一项系统评价和经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Mar;10(9):1-132. iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10090.
3
A systematic review and economic evaluation of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of aldosterone antagonists for postmyocardial infarction heart failure.心肌梗死后心力衰竭中醛固酮拮抗剂的临床疗效和成本效果的系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2010 May;14(24):1-162. doi: 10.3310/hta14240.
4
The Cost Effectiveness of Maintenance Schedules Following Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: An Economic Evaluation Alongside a Randomised Controlled Trial.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者肺康复后维持计划的成本效益:一项与随机对照试验同时进行的经济学评估
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2016 Feb;14(1):105-15. doi: 10.1007/s40258-015-0199-9.
5
Cost-effectiveness of an online supervised group physical and mental health rehabilitation programme for adults with post-COVID-19 condition after hospitalisation for COVID-19: the REGAIN RCT.新冠肺炎后住院成人的 COVID-19 后(post-COVID-19)状况的线上监督团体身心康复计划的成本效益:REGAIN RCT 研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct 31;24(1):1326. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11679-5.
6
Cost-effectiveness of High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) vs Moderate Intensity Steady-State (MISS) Training in UK Cardiac Rehabilitation.高强度间歇训练(HIIT)与英国心脏康复中中等强度稳定状态(MISS)训练的成本效益比较。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2024 Apr;105(4):639-646. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2023.09.005. Epub 2023 Sep 18.
7
Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness results from the randomised controlled Trial of Oral Mandibular Advancement Devices for Obstructive sleep apnoea-hypopnoea (TOMADO) and long-term economic analysis of oral devices and continuous positive airway pressure.阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征口腔下颌前移装置随机对照试验(TOMADO)的临床疗效和成本效益结果以及口腔装置与持续气道正压通气的长期经济分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Oct;18(67):1-296. doi: 10.3310/hta18670.
8
Cost-Effectiveness of an Extended-Role General Practitioner Clinic for Persistent Physical Symptoms: Results From the Multiple Symptoms Study 3 Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial.持续身体症状的扩展角色全科医生诊所的成本效益:多症状研究 3 项实用随机对照试验的结果。
Value Health. 2024 Dec;27(12):1710-1721. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2024.09.015. Epub 2024 Oct 18.
9
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cardiac resynchronisation (biventricular pacing) for heart failure: systematic review and economic model.心脏再同步治疗(双心室起搏)用于心力衰竭的临床疗效及成本效益:系统评价与经济学模型
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Nov;11(47):iii-iv, ix-248. doi: 10.3310/hta11470.
10
The effect of two speech and language approaches on speech problems in people with Parkinson's disease: the PD COMM RCT.两种言语语言治疗方法对帕金森病患者言语问题的影响:PD COMM RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(58):1-141. doi: 10.3310/ADWP8001.

引用本文的文献

1
Economic Evaluation of Palliative Care for Patients with Cancer Disease: A Systematic Review.癌症患者姑息治疗的经济评估:一项系统综述。
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2022 Nov 23;36:141. doi: 10.47176/mjiri.36.141. eCollection 2022.
2
Exploring the costs, consequences and efficiency of three types of palliative care day services in the UK: a pragmatic before-and-after descriptive cohort study.探讨英国三种姑息治疗日间服务的成本、后果和效率:一项实用的前后描述性队列研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Aug 7;19(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00624-y.
3
Cost-effectiveness of a physical exercise programme for residents of care homes: a pilot study.

本文引用的文献

1
Developing a costing framework for palliative care services.制定姑息治疗服务的成本核算框架。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014 Oct;48(4):719-29. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.11.017. Epub 2014 Apr 5.
2
Early specialty palliative care.早期专科姑息治疗。
N Engl J Med. 2014 Mar 13;370(11):1075-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1400243.
3
Early integration of palliative care services with standard oncology care for patients with advanced cancer.晚期癌症患者的姑息治疗服务与标准肿瘤治疗的早期整合。
养老院居民体育锻炼计划的成本效益:一项试点研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2016 Apr 18;16:83. doi: 10.1186/s12877-016-0261-y.
4
Cancer rehabilitation and palliative care: critical components in the delivery of high-quality oncology services.癌症康复与姑息治疗:提供高质量肿瘤服务的关键组成部分。
Support Care Cancer. 2015 Dec;23(12):3633-43. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2916-1. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
CA Cancer J Clin. 2013 Sep;63(5):349-63. doi: 10.3322/caac.21192. Epub 2013 Jul 15.
4
Resource-use measurement based on patient recall: issues and challenges for economic evaluation.基于患者回忆的资源利用测量:经济评价面临的问题和挑战。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2013 Jun;11(3):155-61. doi: 10.1007/s40258-013-0022-4.
5
Rehabilitation in advanced, progressive, recurrent cancer: a randomized controlled trial.晚期、进展性、复发性癌症的康复:一项随机对照试验。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2013 Sep;46(3):315-325.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.08.017. Epub 2012 Nov 20.
6
Evaluation of an admission and discharge programme at a UK specialist palliative day hospice.对英国一家专科姑息日间临终关怀机构的入院及出院程序的评估。
Int J Palliat Nurs. 2012 Jun;18(6):275-81. doi: 10.12968/ijpn.2012.18.6.275.
7
A pilot study to evaluate an outpatient service for people with advanced lung cancer.一项评估针对晚期肺癌患者门诊服务的试点研究。
Int J Palliat Nurs. 2012 May;18(5):225-33. doi: 10.12968/ijpn.2012.18.5.225.
8
Is a QALY still a QALY at the end of life?生命终末期,QALY 还是 QALY 吗?
J Health Econ. 2012 May;31(3):521-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2012.01.006. Epub 2012 Apr 21.
9
Why do health professionals refer individual patients to specialist day hospice care?为什么卫生保健专业人员会将个别患者转介到专科日间临终关怀护理机构?
J Palliat Med. 2011 Feb;14(2):133-8. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2010.0372. Epub 2011 Jan 16.
10
Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance.开发与评估复杂干预措施:医学研究理事会新指南
BMJ. 2008 Sep 29;337:a1655. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1655.