Department of Dermatology und Allergology Biederstein, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Allergy. 2015 Feb;70(2):227-35. doi: 10.1111/all.12548.
Structured educational programmes for patients at risk for anaphylaxis have not yet been established. Patients and caregivers often lack adequate skills in managing the disease.
To investigate effects of structured patient education intervention on knowledge, emergency management skills and psychological parameters in patients with previous episodes of anaphylaxis and caregivers of affected children 95 caregivers (11 male, 84 female, mean age 37 years) of affected children and 98 patients (32 male, 66 female, mean age 47.5 years) were randomly assigned to an intervention (IG) or control group (CG) in a multicentre randomized controlled trial. The IG received two 3-h schooling modules of group education; the CG received standard auto-injector training only. Knowledge of anaphylaxis and emergency management competence in a validated training anaphylaxis situation as main outcome measures as well as secondary psychological parameters were assessed at baseline and 3 months after intervention.
In comparison with controls, the intervention led to significant improvement of knowledge from baseline to 3-month follow-up (caregivers: IG 3.2/13.2 improvement/baseline vs CG 0.7/12.6; P < 0.001; patients: IG 3.9/10.8 vs 1.3/12.6; P < 0.001). Moreover, emergency management competence was increased after intervention as compared to controls (caregivers: IG 8.6/11.2 vs CG 1.2/10.8; P < 0.001; patients: 7.1/11.0 vs 1.1/11.1; P < 0.001). Intervention showed significant reduction of caregiver anxiety (-1.9/8.4 vs -0.7/7.5; P < 0.05). There were no significant changes in the depression scores.
Structured patient education programmes may be beneficial in the management of anaphylaxis by increasing patients' empowerment to prevent and treat the disease.
针对过敏反应风险患者的结构化教育计划尚未建立。患者和护理人员在管理疾病方面通常缺乏足够的技能。
为了研究结构化患者教育干预对有过敏反应既往史的患者和受影响儿童的护理人员的知识、紧急管理技能和心理参数的影响,95 名受影响儿童的护理人员(11 名男性,84 名女性,平均年龄 37 岁)和 98 名患者(32 名男性,66 名女性,平均年龄 47.5 岁)被随机分配到干预组(IG)或对照组(CG)在一项多中心随机对照试验中。IG 接受了两个 3 小时的小组教育课程;CG 仅接受标准自动注射器培训。主要结局测量是在基线和干预 3 个月后评估过敏反应的验证培训过敏反应情况下的知识和紧急管理能力,以及次要心理参数。
与对照组相比,干预导致知识从基线到 3 个月随访的显著改善(护理人员:IG 3.2/13.2 改善/基线与 CG 0.7/12.6;P<0.001;患者:IG 3.9/10.8 与 1.3/12.6;P<0.001)。此外,与对照组相比,干预后紧急管理能力增加(护理人员:IG 8.6/11.2 与 CG 1.2/10.8;P<0.001;患者:7.1/11.0 与 1.1/11.1;P<0.001)。干预显著降低了护理人员的焦虑(-1.9/8.4 与-0.7/7.5;P<0.05)。抑郁评分没有显著变化。
结构化患者教育计划通过增强患者预防和治疗疾病的能力,可能有助于过敏反应的管理。