Parvaneh Shahriar, Cocks Errol, Buchanan Angus, Ghahari Setareh
School of Occupational Therapy and Social Work, Centre for Research into Disability and Society, Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Curtin University , Perth, Western Australia , Australia .
Brain Inj. 2015;29(3):320-8. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2014.976592. Epub 2014 Nov 19.
The paper describes development of the Assessment of Community Integration Programme Attributes (ACIPA) measure based on a descriptive community integration framework. The purpose of this measure is to allow evaluation of community integration programmes for adults with acquired brain injury (ABI).
The Community Integration Framework (CIF) was used to design a fidelity evaluation measure through consultation with 37 participants from five stakeholder groups (practitioners, researchers, policy-makers, people with ABI and family members of people with ABI) using semi-structured interviews, focus groups, iterative surveys and a multi-attribute utility (MAU) method.
The resultant measure included seven themes and 21 attributes. Each attribute included indicators and probing questions. Weights were assigned to each theme and constituent attributes.
Programme evaluation commonly focuses on outcomes, often overlooking analysis of programme processes. Although it requires further psychometric (reliability and validity) development, the Assessment of Community Integration Programme Attributes may be used to assess the relationship between programme processes and specific outcomes and also to inform the development of programmes aiming to enhance community integration for adults with ABI.
本文描述了基于描述性社区融合框架的社区融合计划属性评估（ACIPA）方法的开发。该方法的目的是对获得性脑损伤（ABI）成人的社区融合计划进行评估。
社区融合框架（CIF）用于通过与来自五个利益相关者群体（从业者、研究人员、政策制定者、ABI患者及其家庭成员）的37名参与者进行半结构化访谈、焦点小组讨论、迭代调查和多属性效用（MAU）方法，设计一种保真度评估方法。
最终的评估方法包括七个主题和21个属性。每个属性都包括指标和探究性问题。为每个主题和组成属性分配了权重。
项目评估通常侧重于结果，往往忽视对项目过程的分析。尽管社区融合计划属性评估需要进一步进行心理测量学（信度和效度）开发，但它可用于评估项目过程与特定结果之间的关系，并为旨在增强ABI成人社区融合的项目开发提供信息。
