Saatchi Mahdi, Beever Jonathan E, Decker Jared E, Faulkner Dan B, Freetly Harvey C, Hansen Stephanie L, Yampara-Iquise Helen, Johnson Kristen A, Kachman Stephen D, Kerley Monty S, Kim JaeWoo, Loy Daniel D, Marques Elisa, Neibergs Holly L, Pollak E John, Schnabel Robert D, Seabury Christopher M, Shike Daniel W, Snelling Warren M, Spangler Matthew L, Weaber Robert L, Garrick Dorian J, Taylor Jeremy F
Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames 50011, USA.
BMC Genomics. 2014 Nov 20;15(1):1004. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-1004.
The identification of genetic markers associated with complex traits that are expensive to record such as feed intake or feed efficiency would allow these traits to be included in selection programs. To identify large-effect QTL, we performed a series of genome-wide association studies and functional analyses using 50 K and 770 K SNP genotypes scored in 5,133 animals from 4 independent beef cattle populations (Cycle VII, Angus, Hereford and Simmental×Angus) with phenotypes for average daily gain, dry matter intake, metabolic mid-test body weight and residual feed intake.
A total of 5, 6, 11 and 10 significant QTL (defined as 1-Mb genome windows with Bonferroni-corrected P-value<0.05) were identified for average daily gain, dry matter intake, metabolic mid-test body weight and residual feed intake, respectively. The identified QTL were population-specific and had little overlap across the 4 populations. The pleiotropic or closely linked QTL on BTA 7 at 23 Mb identified in the Angus population harbours a promising candidate gene ACSL6 (acyl-CoA synthetase long-chain family member 6), and was the largest effect QTL associated with dry matter intake and mid-test body weight explaining 10.39% and 14.25% of the additive genetic variance, respectively. Pleiotropic or closely linked QTL associated with average daily gain and mid-test body weight were detected on BTA 6 at 38 Mb and BTA 7 at 93 Mb confirming previous reports. No QTL for residual feed intake explained more than 2.5% of the additive genetic variance in any population. Marker-based estimates of heritability ranged from 0.21 to 0.49 for residual feed intake across the 4 populations.
This GWAS study, which is the largest performed for feed efficiency and its component traits in beef cattle to date, identified several large-effect QTL that cumulatively explained a significant percentage of additive genetic variance within each population. Differences in the QTL identified among the different populations may be due to differences in power to detect QTL, environmental variation, or differences in the genetic architecture of trait variation among breeds. These results enhance our understanding of the biology of growth, feed intake and utilisation in beef cattle.
识别与复杂性状相关的遗传标记,如采食量或饲料效率等记录成本较高的性状,将有助于把这些性状纳入选择计划。为了识别具有较大效应的QTL,我们使用了50K和770K SNP基因型,对来自4个独立肉牛群体(第七轮、安格斯、海福特和西门塔尔×安格斯)的5133头动物进行了全基因组关联研究和功能分析,这些动物具有平均日增重、干物质采食量、代谢中期体重和剩余采食量的表型数据。
分别为平均日增重、干物质采食量、代谢中期体重和剩余采食量鉴定出5个、6个、11个和10个显著的QTL(定义为经Bonferroni校正的P值<0.05的1-Mb基因组窗口)。所鉴定的QTL具有群体特异性,在这4个群体中几乎没有重叠。在安格斯群体中,位于BTA 7上23 Mb处的多效性或紧密连锁的QTL包含一个有前景的候选基因ACSL6(酰基辅酶A合成酶长链家族成员6),并且是与干物质采食量和中期体重相关联的效应最大的QTL,分别解释了10.39%和14.25%的加性遗传方差。在BTA 6上38 Mb处和BTA 7上93 Mb处检测到与平均日增重和中期体重相关的多效性或紧密连锁的QTL,证实了先前的报道。在任何群体中,剩余采食量的QTL解释的加性遗传方差均不超过2.5%。基于标记的遗传力估计值在这4个群体的剩余采食量中范围为0.21至0.49。
这项全基因组关联研究是迄今为止针对肉牛饲料效率及其组成性状开展的规模最大的研究,鉴定出了几个具有较大效应的QTL,这些QTL累计解释了每个群体内相当比例的加性遗传方差。不同群体中鉴定出的QTL差异可能是由于检测QTL的能力差异、环境变异或品种间性状变异的遗传结构差异所致。这些结果增进了我们对肉牛生长、采食量和利用生物学的理解。