• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内镜超声引导下双猪尾塑料支架引流胰腺假性囊肿的疗效和安全性:单中心经验。

Efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts using double-pigtail plastic stents: A single tertiary center experience.

机构信息

Departamento de Endoscopia, Hospital Universitario, Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo (UNIFESP), Sao Paulo, SP, BR.

出版信息

Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2021 Aug 4;76:e2701. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2021/e2701. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.6061/clinics/2021/e2701
PMID:34378728
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8311639/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Pancreatic pseudocysts (PPC) are fluid collections with a well-defined wall that persist for more than 4 weeks inside or around the pancreas as a result of pancreatic inflammation and/or a ductal lesion. PPC have been successfully treated with endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage using different stents. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of EUS-guided drainage of PPC using double-pigtail plastic stents in a tertiary hospital.

METHODS

Patients with PPC referred for EUS-guided drainage between May 2015 and December 2019 were included in this case series. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the efficacy (clinical success) and safety (adverse events and mortality) of EUS-guided drainage of PPC. Secondary endpoints included technical success and pseudocyst recurrence.

RESULTS

Eleven patients (mean age, 44.5±18.98 years) were included in this study. The etiologies for PPC were acute biliary pancreatitis, chronic alcoholic pancreatitis, and blunt abdominal trauma. The mean pseudocyst size was 9.4±2.69 cm. The clinical success rate was 91% (10/11). Adverse events occurred in three of 11 patients (27%). There were no cases of mortality. The technical success rate was 100%. Pseudocyst recurrence was identified in one of 11 patients (9%) at 12 weeks after successful clinical drainage and complete pseudocyst resolution.

CONCLUSION

EUS-guided transmural drainage of PPC using double-pigtail plastic stents is safe and effective with high technical and clinical success rates.

摘要

目的

胰腺假性囊肿(PPC)是一种由于胰腺炎症和/或导管病变导致的在胰腺内或周围持续超过 4 周的具有明确壁的液体聚集物。已经成功地使用不同的支架通过内镜超声(EUS)引导引流来治疗 PPC。本研究旨在评估在一家三级医院使用双猪尾塑料支架进行 EUS 引导引流 PPC 的安全性和疗效。

方法

本病例系列研究纳入了 2015 年 5 月至 2019 年 12 月期间因 EUS 引导引流而转诊的 PPC 患者。主要终点是评估 EUS 引导引流 PPC 的疗效(临床成功率)和安全性(不良事件和死亡率)。次要终点包括技术成功率和假性囊肿复发。

结果

本研究纳入了 11 例患者(平均年龄 44.5±18.98 岁)。PPC 的病因包括急性胆源性胰腺炎、慢性酒精性胰腺炎和钝性腹部外伤。假性囊肿的平均大小为 9.4±2.69cm。临床成功率为 91%(10/11)。11 例患者中有 3 例(27%)发生了不良事件。无死亡病例。技术成功率为 100%。在成功的临床引流和完全假性囊肿消退后 12 周,有 1 例(9%)患者出现假性囊肿复发。

结论

使用双猪尾塑料支架进行 EUS 引导经壁引流 PPC 是安全有效的,具有较高的技术和临床成功率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6272/8311639/7a8b89e47abc/cln-76-e2701-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6272/8311639/5fd072352077/cln-76-e2701-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6272/8311639/e61b7c134f77/cln-76-e2701-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6272/8311639/010ef3ed3bb8/cln-76-e2701-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6272/8311639/7a8b89e47abc/cln-76-e2701-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6272/8311639/5fd072352077/cln-76-e2701-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6272/8311639/e61b7c134f77/cln-76-e2701-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6272/8311639/010ef3ed3bb8/cln-76-e2701-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6272/8311639/7a8b89e47abc/cln-76-e2701-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts using double-pigtail plastic stents: A single tertiary center experience.内镜超声引导下双猪尾塑料支架引流胰腺假性囊肿的疗效和安全性:单中心经验。
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2021 Aug 4;76:e2701. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2021/e2701. eCollection 2021.
2
WONDER-02: plastic stent vs. lumen-apposing metal stent for endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts-study protocol for a multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial.WONDER-02:内镜超声引导下引流胰腺假性囊肿的塑料支架与 lumen-apposing 金属支架的比较——一项多中心随机非劣效性试验研究方案。
Trials. 2024 Aug 24;25(1):559. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08373-6.
3
A novel self-expanding biflanged metal stent vs tubular metal stent for EUS-guided transmural drainage of pancreatic pseudocyst: A retrospective, cohort study.新型自膨式双凸缘金属支架与管状金属支架用于超声内镜引导下经壁引流胰腺假性囊肿的回顾性队列研究
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jan;98(3):e14179. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014179.
4
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic fluid collections' transmural drainage outcomes in 100 consecutive cases of pseudocysts and walled off necrosis: a single-centre experience from the United Kingdom.内镜超声引导下胰液积聚经壁引流治疗100例连续性假性囊肿和包裹性坏死的结果:来自英国的单中心经验
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2018 May;53(5):611-615. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2017.1398346. Epub 2017 Nov 9.
5
Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Trans-esophageal Transmural Drainage of Mediastinal Pseudocysts: A Case Series.内镜超声引导经食管透壁纵隔假性囊肿引流:病例系列。
J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2023 Mar 31;32(1):58-64. doi: 10.15403/jgld-4530.
6
Efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasound guided drainage of pseudocysts and walled-off necrosis after failure of percutaneous drainage.经皮引流失败后内镜超声引导下假性囊肿及包裹性坏死引流的疗效与安全性
Surg Endosc. 2023 Apr;37(4):2626-2632. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09741-6. Epub 2022 Nov 11.
7
Increased Incidence of Pseudoaneurysm Bleeding With Lumen-Apposing Metal Stents Compared to Double-Pigtail Plastic Stents in Patients With Peripancreatic Fluid Collections.与双猪尾塑料支架相比, lumen- 吻合金属支架在胰周积液患者中假性动脉瘤出血的发生率增加。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Sep;16(9):1521-1528. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.02.021. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
8
Short- and long-term results of endoscopic ultrasound-guided transmural drainage for pancreatic pseudocysts and walled-off necrosis.内镜超声引导下经壁引流治疗胰腺假性囊肿和包裹性坏死的近期和远期疗效。
World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Oct 21;23(39):7110-7118. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i39.7110.
9
Head-to-head comparison between endoscopic ultrasound guided lumen apposing metal stent and plastic stents for the treatment of pancreatic fluid collections: A systematic review and meta-analysis.内镜超声引导下置管引流与塑料支架治疗胰腺液体积聚的头对头比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2022 Feb;29(2):198-211. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.1008. Epub 2021 Jun 28.
10
Endosonography-guided transmural drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts using an exchange-free access device: initial clinical experience.超声内镜引导下使用无交换式通道引流装置经胃壁对胰腺假性囊肿进行引流:初步临床经验。
Surg Endosc. 2013 May;27(5):1835-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2682-9. Epub 2013 Jan 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of acid-suppressive drugs on endoscopic transmural drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections-a randomized controlled trial.抑酸药物对胰腺周围液体积聚内镜下经壁引流的影响——一项随机对照试验
PeerJ. 2025 Aug 19;13:e19872. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19872. eCollection 2025.
2
The Surgical Management of Pancreatic Pseudocysts: A Narrative Review.胰腺假性囊肿的外科治疗:一项叙述性综述
Cureus. 2024 Sep 10;16(9):e69055. doi: 10.7759/cureus.69055. eCollection 2024 Sep.

本文引用的文献

1
Endoscopic treatment of chronic pancreatitis: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Updated August 2018.内镜治疗慢性胰腺炎:欧洲胃肠道内镜学会(ESGE)指南-更新于 2018 年 8 月。
Endoscopy. 2019 Feb;51(2):179-193. doi: 10.1055/a-0822-0832. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
2
A systematic review and meta-analysis of metal versus plastic stents for drainage of pancreatic fluid collections: metal stents are advantageous.金属支架与塑料支架引流胰腺积液的系统评价和荟萃分析:金属支架更具优势。
Surg Endosc. 2019 May;33(5):1412-1425. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6416-5. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
3
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Drainage of Pancreatic Fluid Collections.
内镜超声引导下胰液积聚引流术
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2018 Apr;28(2):157-169. doi: 10.1016/j.giec.2017.11.004.
4
Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Pancreatic Pseudocyst Drainage with Lumen-apposing Metal Stents or Plastic Double-pigtail Stents: A Multifactorial Analysis.内镜超声引导下使用管腔对合金属支架或塑料双猪尾支架进行胰腺假性囊肿引流:多因素分析
J Transl Int Med. 2017 Dec 29;5(4):213-219. doi: 10.1515/jtim-2017-0036. eCollection 2017 Dec.
5
Efficacy and Safety of Lumen-Apposing Metal Stents in Management of Pancreatic Fluid Collections: Are They Better Than Plastic Stents? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.腔内置入金属支架治疗胰腺积液的疗效和安全性:它们优于塑料支架吗?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Dig Dis Sci. 2018 Feb;63(2):289-301. doi: 10.1007/s10620-017-4851-0. Epub 2017 Dec 27.
6
Modern Management of Pancreatic Fluid Collections.胰腺液体积聚的现代管理
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2018 Feb;52(2):97-104. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000940.
7
EUS-guided drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections with lumen-apposing metal stents and plastic double-pigtail stents: comparison of efficacy and adverse event rates.EUS 引导下的胰周液体积聚的引流:采用 lumen-apposing 金属支架和塑料双猪尾支架的疗效和不良事件发生率比较。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Jan;87(1):150-157. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.06.029. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
8
A two-center comparative study of plastic and lumen-apposing large diameter self-expandable metallic stents in endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections.塑料与管腔贴附型大口径自膨式金属支架在内镜超声引导下胰液积聚引流中的双中心对比研究
Endosc Ultrasound. 2016 Sep-Oct;5(5):320-327. doi: 10.4103/2303-9027.191659.
9
Lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) for pancreatic fluid collection (PFC) drainage: may not be business as usual.用于胰液积聚(PFC)引流的管腔对接金属支架(LAMS):可能并非一如既往。
Gut. 2017 Dec;66(12):2054-2056. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-312812. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
10
Lumen-apposing metal stents for drainage of pancreatic fluid collections: When and for whom?腔内置入金属支架治疗胰腺液体积聚:何时及针对哪些患者?
Dig Endosc. 2017 Jan;29(1):83-90. doi: 10.1111/den.12681. Epub 2016 Jun 15.