Lynch Heather J, Schwaller Mathew R
Department of Ecology and Evolution, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, United States of America.
Mesoscale Atmospheric Processes Laboratory, NASA/Goddard Space Science Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 20;9(11):e113301. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113301. eCollection 2014.
The last several years have seen an increased interest in the use of remote sensing to identify the location of penguin colonies in Antarctica, and the estimation of the abundance of breeding pairs contained therein. High-resolution (sub-meter) commercial satellite imagery (e.g., Worldview-1, Quickbird) is capable of colony detection and abundance estimation for both large and small colonies, and has already been used in a continental-scale survey of Adélie penguins. Medium-resolution Landsat imagery has been used successfully to detect the presence of breeding penguins, but has not been used previously for abundance estimation nor evaluated in terms of its minimum colony size detection threshold. We report on the first comprehensive analysis of the performance of these two methods for both detection and abundance estimation, identify the sensor-specific failure modes that can lead to both false positives and false negatives, and compare the abundance estimates of each method over multiple spatial scales. We find that errors of omission using Landsat imagery are low for colonies larger than ∼10,000 breeding pairs. Both high-resolution and Landsat imagery can be used to obtain unbiased estimates of abundance, and while Landsat-derived abundance estimates have high variance for individual breeding colonies relative to estimates derived from high-resolution imagery, this difference declines as the spatial domain of interest is increased. At the continental scale, abundance estimates using the two methods are roughly equivalent. Our comparison of these two methods represents a bridge between the more developed high-resolution imagery, which can be expensive to obtain, and the medium-resolution Landsat-7 record, which is freely available; this comparison of methodologies represents an essential step towards integration of these disparate sources of data for regional assessments of Adélie population abundance and distribution.
在过去几年中,人们对利用遥感技术确定南极洲企鹅栖息地的位置以及估算其中繁殖对数量的兴趣日益浓厚。高分辨率(亚米级)商业卫星图像(如Worldview-1、Quickbird)能够检测大小企鹅栖息地并估算其数量,且已用于阿德利企鹅的全大陆范围调查。中等分辨率的陆地卫星图像已成功用于检测繁殖企鹅的存在,但此前未用于数量估算,也未就其最小栖息地大小检测阈值进行评估。我们首次全面分析了这两种方法在检测和数量估算方面的性能,确定了可能导致误报和漏报的特定传感器故障模式,并在多个空间尺度上比较了每种方法的数量估算结果。我们发现,对于大于约10000对繁殖对的栖息地,使用陆地卫星图像的漏报误差较低。高分辨率图像和陆地卫星图像均可用于获得无偏数量估算,虽然相对于高分辨率图像得出的估算结果,陆地卫星图像得出的单个繁殖栖息地数量估算具有较高方差,但随着感兴趣空间域的增大,这种差异会减小。在大陆尺度上,两种方法的数量估算大致相当。我们对这两种方法的比较在获取成本较高的更先进高分辨率图像和免费可得的中等分辨率陆地卫星7记录之间架起了一座桥梁;这种方法比较是将这些不同数据源整合用于阿德利企鹅种群数量和分布区域评估的关键一步。