• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Loss of traditional knowledge aggravates wolf-human conflict in Georgia (Caucasus) in the wake of socio-economic change.在社会经济变革之后,传统知识的流失加剧了格鲁吉亚(高加索地区)的狼与人之间的冲突。
Ambio. 2015 Sep;44(5):452-7. doi: 10.1007/s13280-014-0580-1. Epub 2014 Nov 21.
2
Conflict Misleads Large Carnivore Management and Conservation: Brown Bears and Wolves in Spain.冲突误导大型食肉动物的管理与保护:西班牙的棕熊与狼
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 14;11(3):e0151541. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151541. eCollection 2016.
3
Gene flow between wolf and shepherd dog populations in Georgia (Caucasus).格鲁吉亚(高加索)地区狼与牧羊犬种群间的基因流动。
J Hered. 2014 May-Jun;105(3):345-53. doi: 10.1093/jhered/esu014. Epub 2014 Mar 12.
4
Community Resource Uses and Ethiopian Wolf Conservation in Mount Abune Yosef.阿卜内·约瑟夫山的社区资源利用与埃塞俄比亚狼保护
Environ Manage. 2015 Sep;56(3):684-94. doi: 10.1007/s00267-015-0529-6. Epub 2015 May 14.
5
Patterns of livestock predation by carnivores: human-wildlife conflict in northwest Yunnan, China.家畜被食肉动物捕食的模式:中国滇西北的人兽冲突。
Environ Manage. 2013 Dec;52(6):1334-40. doi: 10.1007/s00267-013-0192-8. Epub 2013 Nov 8.
6
Plant-based remedies for wolf bites and rituals against wolves in the Iberian Peninsula: Therapeutic opportunities and cultural values for the conservation of biocultural diversity.基于植物的治疗方法治疗狼咬伤和伊比利亚半岛的防狼仪式:保护生物文化多样性的治疗机会和文化价值。
J Ethnopharmacol. 2017 Sep 14;209:124-139. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2017.07.038. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
7
Desert pastoralists' negative and positive effects on rare wildlife in the Gobi.沙漠牧民对戈壁地区珍稀野生动物的负面影响与正面影响。
Conserv Biol. 2017 Apr;31(2):269-277. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12881. Epub 2017 Jan 13.
8
Anthropogenic food resources sustain wolves in conflict scenarios of Western Iran.人为食物资源维持着伊朗西部冲突地区的狼群。
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 17;14(6):e0218345. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218345. eCollection 2019.
9
Risk map for wolf threats to livestock still predictive 5 years after construction.狼对牲畜构成威胁的风险地图在绘制五年后仍具有预测性。
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 30;12(6):e0180043. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180043. eCollection 2017.
10
To Eat or Not To Eat? The Diet of the Endangered Iberian Wolf (Canis lupus signatus) in a Human-Dominated Landscape in Central Portugal.吃还是不吃?葡萄牙中部人类主导景观中濒危伊比利亚狼(Canis lupus signatus)的饮食
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 1;10(6):e0129379. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129379. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
Wolf Population Size and Composition in One of Europe's Strongholds, the Romanian Carpathians.欧洲重要据点之一罗马尼亚喀尔巴阡山脉的狼种群规模与构成
Ecol Evol. 2025 Apr 15;15(4):e71200. doi: 10.1002/ece3.71200. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Knowledge exchange in the implementation of National Environmental Programmes (NEPs) in China: A complex picture.中国国家环境方案实施中的知识交流:复杂的情况。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 13;18(7):e0288641. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288641. eCollection 2023.
3
Unity in diversity-food plants and fungi of Sakartvelo (Republic of Georgia), Caucasus.多样性中的统一——萨卡塔维洛(格鲁吉亚共和国)、高加索地区的食用植物和真菌。
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2021 Dec 31;17(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s13002-021-00490-9.
4
Global trends of local ecological knowledge and future implications.全球地方生态知识的趋势及未来影响。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 5;13(4):e0195440. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195440. eCollection 2018.
5
High overlap between traditional ecological knowledge and forest conservation found in the Bolivian Amazon.在玻利维亚亚马逊地区发现传统生态知识与森林保护之间存在高度重叠。
Ambio. 2018 Dec;47(8):908-923. doi: 10.1007/s13280-018-1040-0. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
6
A comparative ethnobotany of Khevsureti, Samtskhe-Javakheti, Tusheti, Svaneti, and Racha-Lechkhumi, Republic of Georgia (Sakartvelo), Caucasus.格鲁吉亚共和国(萨卡维洛)高加索地区赫夫苏列蒂、萨姆茨赫-扎瓦赫季、图舍蒂、斯瓦涅季以及拉恰-列其呼米的比较民族植物学
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2016 Sep 21;12(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s13002-016-0110-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Genetic variability of the grey wolf Canis lupus in the Caucasus in comparison with Europe and the Middle East: distinct or intermediary population?与欧洲和中东地区相比,高加索地区灰狼(Canis lupus)的遗传变异性:独特种群还是中间种群?
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 8;9(4):e93828. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093828. eCollection 2014.
2
Gene flow between wolf and shepherd dog populations in Georgia (Caucasus).格鲁吉亚(高加索)地区狼与牧羊犬种群间的基因流动。
J Hered. 2014 May-Jun;105(3):345-53. doi: 10.1093/jhered/esu014. Epub 2014 Mar 12.
3
Large carnivores and human safety: a review.大型食肉动物与人类安全:综述
Ambio. 2004 Aug;33(6):283-8. doi: 10.1579/0044-7447-33.6.283.

在社会经济变革之后,传统知识的流失加剧了格鲁吉亚(高加索地区)的狼与人之间的冲突。

Loss of traditional knowledge aggravates wolf-human conflict in Georgia (Caucasus) in the wake of socio-economic change.

作者信息

Kikvidze Zaal, Tevzadze Gigi

机构信息

4D Research Institute, Ilia State University, Room 310, Building E, 5 Cholokashvili Ave., 0162, Tbilisi, Georgia,

出版信息

Ambio. 2015 Sep;44(5):452-7. doi: 10.1007/s13280-014-0580-1. Epub 2014 Nov 21.

DOI:10.1007/s13280-014-0580-1
PMID:25413022
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4510320/
Abstract

Reports of the damage from wolf attacks have increased considerably over the last decade in Georgia (in the Caucasus). We interviewed locals about this problem in two focal regions: the Lanchkhuti area (in western Georgia) and Kazbegi District (in eastern Georgia) where livestock numbers had increased by an order of magnitude owing to dramatic shifts in the local economies over the last decade. This coincided with expanding habitats for wolves (abandoned plantations, for example). We found that the perceived damage from wolves was positively correlated with a poor knowledge of wolf habits and inappropriate livestock husbandry practices. Our results suggest a loss of traditional knowledge contributes strongly to the wolf-human conflicts in Georgia. Restoring traditional, simple but good practices--such as protecting herds using shepherd dogs and introducing bulls into the herds-can help one solve this problem.

摘要

在格鲁吉亚(高加索地区),过去十年间狼袭击造成的损失报告显著增加。我们就这一问题采访了两个重点地区的当地人:兰奇胡蒂地区(格鲁吉亚西部)和卡兹别吉区(格鲁吉亚东部),在过去十年里,由于当地经济的巨大转变,这两个地区的牲畜数量增加了一个数量级。这与狼栖息地的扩大(例如废弃种植园)相吻合。我们发现,人们认为狼造成的损失与对狼习性的了解不足以及不恰当的畜牧方式呈正相关。我们的结果表明,传统知识的丧失在很大程度上导致了格鲁吉亚的狼与人类冲突。恢复传统、简单但有效的做法——比如用牧羊犬保护畜群以及在畜群中引入公牛——有助于解决这一问题。