Suppr超能文献

狼对牲畜构成威胁的风险地图在绘制五年后仍具有预测性。

Risk map for wolf threats to livestock still predictive 5 years after construction.

作者信息

Treves Adrian, Rabenhorst Mark F

机构信息

Nelson Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.

Carnivore Coexistence Lab, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 Jun 30;12(6):e0180043. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180043. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

Risk maps are spatial models of environmental hazards such as predation on livestock. We tested the long-term validity of a published risk map built from locations where Wisconsin wolves attacked livestock from 1999-2006. Using data collected after model construction, we verified the predictive accuracy of the risk map exceeded 91% for the period 2007-2011. Predictive power lasting 5 years or more substantiates the claim that risk maps are both valid and verified tools for anticipating spatial hazards. Classification errors coincided with verifier uncertainty about which wolves might be responsible. Perceived threats by wolves to domestic animals were not as well predicted (82%) as verified attacks had been and errors in classification coincided with incidents involved domestic animals other than bovids and verifier uncertainty about which wolves were involved. We recommend risk maps be used to target interventions selectively at high-risk sites.

摘要

风险地图是诸如牲畜被捕食等环境危害的空间模型。我们测试了一份已发布的风险地图的长期有效性,该地图是根据1999年至2006年威斯康星州狼袭击牲畜的地点构建的。利用模型构建后收集的数据,我们验证了该风险地图在2007年至2011年期间的预测准确率超过91%。持续5年或更长时间的预测能力证实了风险地图是预测空间危害的有效且经过验证的工具这一说法。分类错误与验证者对哪些狼可能负有责任的不确定性相吻合。狼对家畜的感知威胁预测效果不如已验证的攻击情况好(82%),分类错误与涉及牛科动物以外的家畜的事件以及验证者对涉及哪些狼的不确定性相吻合。我们建议使用风险地图有针对性地在高风险地点进行干预。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f86/5493348/c17bbc202c70/pone.0180043.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Risk map for wolf threats to livestock still predictive 5 years after construction.
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 30;12(6):e0180043. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180043. eCollection 2017.
2
Killing wolves to prevent predation on livestock may protect one farm but harm neighbors.
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 10;13(1):e0189729. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189729. eCollection 2018.
3
Conflict Misleads Large Carnivore Management and Conservation: Brown Bears and Wolves in Spain.
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 14;11(3):e0151541. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151541. eCollection 2016.
4
Effects of wolf mortality on livestock depredations.
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 3;9(12):e113505. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113505. eCollection 2014.
5
Anthropogenic food resources sustain wolves in conflict scenarios of Western Iran.
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 17;14(6):e0218345. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218345. eCollection 2019.
8
A landscape of overlapping risks for wolf-human conflict in Wisconsin, USA.
J Environ Manage. 2019 Oct 15;248:109307. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109307. Epub 2019 Aug 10.
9
EU Sanitary Regulation on Livestock Disposal: Implications for the Diet of Wolves.
Environ Manage. 2015 Oct;56(4):890-902. doi: 10.1007/s00267-015-0571-4. Epub 2015 Jun 24.
10
Wolf Lethal Control and Livestock Depredations: Counter-Evidence from Respecified Models.
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 11;11(2):e0148743. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148743. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
Mapping and modeling human-black bear interactions in the Catskills region of New York using resource selection probability functions.
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 22;16(9):e0257716. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257716. eCollection 2021.
2
Wolves make roadways safer, generating large economic returns to predator conservation.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jun 1;118(22). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2023251118.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验