文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

定性研究系统评价的阅读与使用指南

A guide to reading and using systematic reviews of qualitative research.

作者信息

Tong Allison, Palmer Suetonia, Craig Jonathan C, Strippoli Giovanni F M

机构信息

Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia.

Department of Medicine, University of Otago Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand.

出版信息

Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2016 Jun;31(6):897-903. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfu354. Epub 2014 Nov 20.


DOI:10.1093/ndt/gfu354
PMID:25414375
Abstract

There is an increasingly widespread policy momentum to increase patient-centred care and to improve quality of life outcomes within health services. Qualitative research methods are used to elicit in-depth and detailed insights into people's attitudes, beliefs, emotions and experiences-much of which may remain unspoken during clinical encounters. Questions about patients' beliefs and preferences for treatment can be addressed by qualitative research and inform evidence-based strategies for delivering patient-centred care. Systematic reviews of multiple primary qualitative studies bring together findings from different studies to offer new and more comprehensive understandings of social phenomena across various healthcare contexts and populations and are an emerging methodology in the literature including for care in chronic kidney disease. This article will provide a framework for the systematic review of qualitative research so readers can make sense of these study types and use them in clinical care and policy.

摘要

在卫生服务领域,以患者为中心的护理以及改善生活质量结果的政策势头日益强劲。定性研究方法用于深入、详细地洞察人们的态度、信仰、情感和经历——其中许多内容在临床接触中可能并未言明。关于患者治疗信念和偏好的问题可以通过定性研究来解决,并为提供以患者为中心的护理的循证策略提供依据。对多个原发性定性研究的系统评价将不同研究的结果汇总在一起,以便对各种医疗环境和人群中的社会现象提供新的、更全面的理解,并且是文献中一种新兴的方法,包括用于慢性肾脏病护理方面。本文将提供一个定性研究系统评价的框架,以便读者理解这些研究类型并将其应用于临床护理和政策制定中。

相似文献

[1]
A guide to reading and using systematic reviews of qualitative research.

Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2016-6

[2]
Exercise interventions and patient beliefs for people with hip, knee or hip and knee osteoarthritis: a mixed methods review.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-4-17

[3]
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.

Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025-6

[4]
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.

JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016-4

[5]
Factors that impact on the use of mechanical ventilation weaning protocols in critically ill adults and children: a qualitative evidence-synthesis.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016-10-4

[6]
The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.

JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016-4

[7]
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.

Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025-5-21

[8]
Community views on mass drug administration for soil-transmitted helminths: a qualitative evidence synthesis.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025-6-20

[9]
Interventions for providers to promote a patient-centred approach in clinical consultations.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012-12-12

[10]
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.

Health Technol Assess. 2001

引用本文的文献

[1]
Exploring dentists' experiences of endodontic file fracture during root canal treatment: a phenomenological study.

BMC Oral Health. 2025-7-1

[2]
Fear of cancer recurrence among adolescent and young adult cancer survivors: a mixed-methods systematic review.

J Cancer Surviv. 2025-4-22

[3]
A systematic review and thematic synthesis exploring how gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM) experience HPV and HPV vaccination.

Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2025-12

[4]
Exploring the barriers and facilitators experienced by patients with heart failure when using popular exergaming platforms for self-management-a systematic review.

Digit Health. 2024-7-25

[5]
A systematic review of users experiences of using digital interventions within psychosis: a thematic synthesis of qualitative research.

Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2025-2

[6]
Qualitative Interviews to Add Patient Perspectives in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Improvements in a Learning Health System.

J Cancer Educ. 2024-2

[7]
Strategies in supporting inclusive education for autistic students-A systematic review of qualitative research results.

Autism Dev Lang Impair. 2022-9-21

[8]
Defining and Implementing Value-Based Healthcare for Older People from a Geriatric and Gerontological Perspective.

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022-9-12

[9]
Exploring sport participation in individuals with spinal cord injury: A qualitative thematic synthesis.

J Spinal Cord Med. 2023-7

[10]
Preparing for the Future of Post-Acute Care: A Metasynthesis of Qualitative Studies.

Home Health Care Manag Pract. 2017-5

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索