• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

狼对道路的行为反应:尺度依赖性矛盾心理。

Behavioral responses of wolves to roads: scale-dependent ambivalence.

作者信息

Zimmermann Barbara, Nelson Lindsey, Wabakken Petter, Sand Håkan, Liberg Olof

机构信息

Faculty of Applied Ecology and Agricultural Sciences, Hedmark University College, Evenstad , N-2480 Koppang , Norway and.

Department of Ecology, Grimsö Wildlife Research Station, Swedish University of Agricultural Science , SE-73091 Riddarhyttan , Sweden.

出版信息

Behav Ecol. 2014 Nov;25(6):1353-1364. doi: 10.1093/beheco/aru134. Epub 2014 Aug 20.

DOI:10.1093/beheco/aru134
PMID:25419085
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4235582/
Abstract

Throughout their recent recovery in several industrialized countries, large carnivores have had to cope with a changed landscape dominated by human infrastructure. Population growth depends on the ability of individuals to adapt to these changes by making use of new habitat features and at the same time to avoid increased risks of mortality associated with human infrastructure. We analyzed the summer movements of 19 GPS-collared resident wolves ( L.) from 14 territories in Scandinavia in relation to roads. We used resource and step selection functions, including >12000 field-checked GPS-positions and 315 kill sites. Wolves displayed ambivalent responses to roads depending on the spatial scale, road type, time of day, behavioral state, and reproductive status. At the site scale (approximately 0.1 km), they selected for roads when traveling, nearly doubling their travel speed. Breeding wolves moved the fastest. At the patch scale (10 km), house density rather than road density was a significant negative predictor of wolf patch selection. At the home range scale (approximately 1000 km), breeding wolves increased gravel road use with increasing road availability, although at a lower rate than expected. Wolves have adapted to use roads for ease of travel, but at the same time developed a cryptic behavior to avoid human encounters. This behavioral plasticity may have been important in allowing the successful recovery of wolf populations in industrialized countries. However, we emphasize the role of roads as a potential cause of increased human-caused mortality.

摘要

在几个工业化国家近期的恢复过程中,大型食肉动物不得不应对由人类基础设施主导的变化了的景观。种群增长取决于个体通过利用新的栖息地特征来适应这些变化的能力,同时还要避免与人类基础设施相关的死亡风险增加。我们分析了来自斯堪的纳维亚14个领地的19只佩戴GPS项圈的常住狼(L.)的夏季活动与道路的关系。我们使用了资源和步长选择函数,包括超过12000个经过实地核查的GPS位置和315个捕杀地点。狼对道路的反应因空间尺度、道路类型、一天中的时间、行为状态和繁殖状态而异。在地点尺度(约0.1公里),它们在行进时选择道路,行进速度几乎翻倍。繁殖期的狼移动速度最快。在斑块尺度(10公里),房屋密度而非道路密度是狼选择斑块的显著负预测因子。在家域尺度(约1000公里),繁殖期的狼随着道路可用性的增加而增加对砾石路的使用,尽管增加速率低于预期。狼已经适应利用道路以便于出行,但同时也发展出一种隐秘行为以避免与人类相遇。这种行为可塑性在工业化国家狼种群的成功恢复中可能起到了重要作用。然而,我们强调道路作为人为死亡率增加的一个潜在原因的作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/746d/4235582/1751d12fe9e8/beheco_aru134_f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/746d/4235582/cbad094593dc/beheco_aru134_f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/746d/4235582/f765bfdc27aa/beheco_aru134_f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/746d/4235582/be9a341a7fba/beheco_aru134_f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/746d/4235582/e689063b06e8/beheco_aru134_f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/746d/4235582/1751d12fe9e8/beheco_aru134_f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/746d/4235582/cbad094593dc/beheco_aru134_f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/746d/4235582/f765bfdc27aa/beheco_aru134_f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/746d/4235582/be9a341a7fba/beheco_aru134_f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/746d/4235582/e689063b06e8/beheco_aru134_f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/746d/4235582/1751d12fe9e8/beheco_aru134_f0005.jpg

相似文献

1
Behavioral responses of wolves to roads: scale-dependent ambivalence.狼对道路的行为反应:尺度依赖性矛盾心理。
Behav Ecol. 2014 Nov;25(6):1353-1364. doi: 10.1093/beheco/aru134. Epub 2014 Aug 20.
2
Elk migration patterns and human activity influence wolf habitat use in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem.麋鹿的迁徙模式和人类活动影响大黄石生态系统中狼的栖息地利用。
Ecol Appl. 2012 Dec;22(8):2293-307. doi: 10.1890/11-1829.1.
3
Temporal variations in female moose responses to roads and logging in the absence of wolves.在没有狼的情况下,雌性驼鹿对道路和伐木活动反应的时间变化。
Ecol Evol. 2024 Feb 1;14(2):e10909. doi: 10.1002/ece3.10909. eCollection 2024 Feb.
4
Functional response of wolves to human development across boreal North America.北美北方地区狼对人类发展的功能反应。
Ecol Evol. 2019 Aug 30;9(18):10801-10815. doi: 10.1002/ece3.5600. eCollection 2019 Sep.
5
Compensatory selection for roads over natural linear features by wolves in northern Ontario: Implications for caribou conservation.安大略省北部狼对道路而非自然线性特征的补偿性选择:对驯鹿保护的影响。
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 8;12(11):e0186525. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186525. eCollection 2017.
6
Wolf habitat selection when sympatric or allopatric with brown bears in Scandinavia.狼在与棕熊同域或异域分布时的生境选择。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jun 18;10(1):9941. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-66626-1.
7
Multi-trophic resource selection function enlightens the behavioural game between wolves and their prey.多营养级资源选择函数揭示了狼与其猎物之间的行为博弈。
J Anim Ecol. 2013 Sep;82(5):1062-71. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12093. Epub 2013 May 23.
8
Space Use and Habitat Selection by Resident and Transient Red Wolves (Canis rufus).留居和迁徙红狼(犬属鲁弗斯种)的空间利用与栖息地选择
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 21;11(12):e0167603. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167603. eCollection 2016.
9
Habitat selection of resident and non-resident gray wolves: implications for habitat connectivity.居民狼和非居民狼的栖息地选择:对栖息地连通性的影响。
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 21;13(1):20415. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-47815-0.
10
Decomposing risk: landscape structure and wolf behavior generate different predation patterns in two sympatric ungulates.分解风险:景观结构和狼的行为在两种同域有蹄类动物中产生不同的捕食模式。
Ecol Appl. 2013 Oct;23(7):1722-34. doi: 10.1890/12-1615.1.

引用本文的文献

1
Carrion Increases Landscape-Scale Scavenger Activity and Interactions.腐肉增加景观尺度的食腐动物活动和相互作用。
Ecol Evol. 2025 Aug 23;15(8):e72059. doi: 10.1002/ece3.72059. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Placement matters: Implications of trail- versus random-based camera-trap deployment for monitoring mammal communities.放置方式很重要:基于路径与随机的相机陷阱部署对监测哺乳动物群落的影响。
Ecol Appl. 2025 Jul;35(5):e70083. doi: 10.1002/eap.70083.
3
Matching the green wave: growing season length determines embryonic diapause in roe deer.

本文引用的文献

1
Geo-spatial aspects of acceptance of illegal hunting of large carnivores in Scandinavia.非法狩猎大型食肉动物在斯堪的纳维亚的接受程度的地理空间方面。
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 24;8(7):e68849. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068849. Print 2013.
2
Shoot, shovel and shut up: cryptic poaching slows restoration of a large carnivore in Europe.射杀、掩埋与闭嘴:隐秘偷猎减缓了欧洲大型食肉动物的恢复进程。
Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Mar 7;279(1730):910-5. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2011.1275. Epub 2011 Aug 17.
3
Human activity helps prey win the predator-prey space race.人类活动帮助猎物在捕食者-猎物的空间竞赛中获胜。
顺应绿色浪潮:生长季节长度决定狍的胚胎滞育
Proc Biol Sci. 2025 May;292(2047):20242903. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2024.2903. Epub 2025 May 21.
4
Vegetation influences wolf fine-scale habitat selection and movement rate in a logged coastal rainforest.植被影响了采伐后的沿海雨林中狼对精细尺度栖息地的选择和移动速度。
Oecologia. 2025 Feb 27;207(3):40. doi: 10.1007/s00442-025-05677-5.
5
Can the Wolf () Thrive in Highly Anthropised Lowlands? First Habitat Suitability Analysis of the Po Plain, Italy.狼(Canis lupus)能在高度人工化的低地生存吗?意大利波河平原的首次栖息地适宜性分析。
Animals (Basel). 2025 Feb 13;15(4):546. doi: 10.3390/ani15040546.
6
Drivers of Wolf Activity in a Human-Dominated Landscape and Its Individual Variability Toward Anthropogenic Disturbance.人类主导景观中狼活动的驱动因素及其对人为干扰的个体差异
Ecol Evol. 2024 Oct 22;14(10):e70397. doi: 10.1002/ece3.70397. eCollection 2024 Oct.
7
Differences in boldness between Eurasian and American wolves () might be based on adaptive mechanisms.欧亚狼和美洲狼在胆量上的差异可能基于适应性机制。
Ecol Evol. 2024 Aug 19;14(8):e70178. doi: 10.1002/ece3.70178. eCollection 2024 Aug.
8
Habitat selection of resident and non-resident gray wolves: implications for habitat connectivity.居民狼和非居民狼的栖息地选择:对栖息地连通性的影响。
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 21;13(1):20415. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-47815-0.
9
Human-nature relationships: An introduction to social-ecological practice theory for human-wildlife interactions.人与自然关系:人类与野生动物相互作用的社会-生态实践理论概论。
Ambio. 2024 Feb;53(2):201-211. doi: 10.1007/s13280-023-01945-x. Epub 2023 Oct 14.
10
Scavenging patterns of an inbred wolf population in a landscape with a pulse of human-provided carrion.在存在人类提供的脉冲式腐肉的景观中,一个近交狼种群的觅食模式。
Ecol Evol. 2023 Jul 4;13(7):e10236. doi: 10.1002/ece3.10236. eCollection 2023 Jul.
PLoS One. 2011 Mar 2;6(3):e17050. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017050.
4
Summer movements, predation and habitat use of wolves in human modified boreal forests.夏季的活动、捕食和生境利用:人类改造后的北方森林中的狼群。
Oecologia. 2011 Apr;165(4):891-903. doi: 10.1007/s00442-010-1883-y. Epub 2011 Jan 5.
5
Behavioural responses to human-induced environmental change.对人为环境变化的行为反应。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2011 Aug;86(3):640-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2010.00164.x. Epub 2010 Oct 27.
6
The interpretation of habitat preference metrics under use-availability designs.基于使用-availability 设计的生境偏好度量的解释。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Jul 27;365(1550):2245-54. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0083.
7
Road and rail side vegetation management implications of habitat use by moose relative to brush cutting season.道路和铁路旁植被管理:驼鹿生境利用与灌木砍伐季节的关系。
Environ Manage. 2010 Jul;46(1):101-9. doi: 10.1007/s00267-010-9502-6. Epub 2010 May 17.
8
Group-size-mediated habitat selection and group fusion-fission dynamics of bison under predation risk.捕食风险下野牛群体大小介导的栖息地选择与群体融合-分裂动态
Ecology. 2009 Sep;90(9):2480-90. doi: 10.1890/08-0345.1.
9
Summer kill rates and predation pattern in a wolf-moose system: can we rely on winter estimates?狼-驼鹿系统中的夏季死亡率和捕食模式:我们能否依赖冬季估计值?
Oecologia. 2008 May;156(1):53-64. doi: 10.1007/s00442-008-0969-2. Epub 2008 Feb 13.
10
Willow on Yellowstone's northern range: evidence for a trophic cascade?黄石公园北部地区的柳树:营养级联效应的证据?
Ecol Appl. 2007 Sep;17(6):1563-71. doi: 10.1890/06-1254.1.