Glatthorn Jonas, Beckschäfer Philip
Department of Plant Ecology, Albrecht von Haller Institute of Plant Sciences, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Chair of Forest Inventory and Remote Sensing, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 24;9(11):e111924. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111924. eCollection 2014.
Hemispherical photography is a well-established method to optically assess ecological parameters related to plant canopies; e.g. ground-level light regimes and the distribution of foliage within the crown space. Interpreting hemispherical photographs involves classifying pixels as either sky or vegetation. A wide range of automatic thresholding or binarization algorithms exists to classify the photographs. The variety in methodology hampers ability to compare results across studies. To identify an optimal threshold selection method, this study assessed the accuracy of seven binarization methods implemented in software currently available for the processing of hemispherical photographs. Therefore, binarizations obtained by the algorithms were compared to reference data generated through a manual binarization of a stratified random selection of pixels. This approach was adopted from the accuracy assessment of map classifications known from remote sensing studies. Percentage correct (Pc) and kappa-statistics (K) were calculated. The accuracy of the algorithms was assessed for photographs taken with automatic exposure settings (auto-exposure) and photographs taken with settings which avoid overexposure (histogram-exposure). In addition, gap fraction values derived from hemispherical photographs were compared with estimates derived from the manually classified reference pixels. All tested algorithms were shown to be sensitive to overexposure. Three of the algorithms showed an accuracy which was high enough to be recommended for the processing of histogram-exposed hemispherical photographs: "Minimum" (Pc 98.8%; K 0.952), "Edge Detection" (Pc 98.1%; K 0.950), and "Minimum Histogram" (Pc 98.1%; K 0.947). The Minimum algorithm overestimated gap fraction least of all (11%). The overestimation by the algorithms Edge Detection (63%) and Minimum Histogram (67%) were considerably larger. For the remaining four evaluated algorithms (IsoData, Maximum Entropy, MinError, and Otsu) an incompatibility with photographs containing overexposed pixels was detected. When applied to histogram-exposed photographs, these algorithms overestimated the gap fraction by at least 180%.
半球形摄影是一种成熟的光学评估与植物冠层相关生态参数的方法;例如地面光照情况以及树冠空间内叶片的分布。解读半球形照片涉及将像素分类为天空或植被。存在多种自动阈值处理或二值化算法来对照片进行分类。方法的多样性阻碍了跨研究比较结果的能力。为了确定最佳阈值选择方法,本研究评估了当前可用于处理半球形照片的软件中实现的七种二值化方法的准确性。因此,将算法得到的二值化结果与通过对分层随机选择的像素进行手动二值化生成的参考数据进行比较。这种方法是从遥感研究中已知的地图分类准确性评估中采用的。计算了正确百分比(Pc)和kappa统计量(K)。针对使用自动曝光设置拍摄的照片(自动曝光)以及使用避免过度曝光的设置拍摄的照片(直方图曝光)评估了算法的准确性。此外,将从半球形照片得出的间隙分数值与从手动分类的参考像素得出的估计值进行了比较。所有测试算法均显示对过度曝光敏感。其中三种算法显示出足够高的准确性,可推荐用于处理直方图曝光的半球形照片:“最小值”(Pc 98.8%;K 0.952)、“边缘检测”(Pc 98.1%;K 0.950)和“最小直方图”(Pc 98.1%;K 0.947)。最小值算法对间隙分数的高估最少(11%)。边缘检测算法(63%)和最小直方图算法(67%)的高估要大得多。对于其余四种评估算法(IsoData、最大熵、最小误差和大津法),检测到与包含过度曝光像素的照片不兼容。当应用于直方图曝光的照片时,这些算法对间隙分数的高估至少为180%。