Hald Bjørn Olav, Welsh Donald G, Holstein-Rathlou Niels-Henrik, Jacobsen Jens Christian Brings
Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3, 2200, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Physiology & Pharmacology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Pflugers Arch. 2015 Oct;467(10):2055-67. doi: 10.1007/s00424-014-1649-1. Epub 2014 Nov 26.
Regulation of blood flow in the microcirculation depends on synchronized vasomotor responses. The vascular conducted response is a synchronous dilatation or constriction, elicited by a local electrical event that spreads along the vessel wall. Despite the underlying electrical nature, however, the efficacy of conducted responses varies significantly between different initiating stimuli within the same vascular bed as well as between different vascular beds following the same stimulus. The differences have stimulated proposals of different mechanisms to account for the experimentally observed variation. Using a computational approach that allows for introduction of structural and electrophysiological heterogeneity, we systematically tested variations in both arteriolar electrophysiology and modes of stimuli. Within the same vessel, our simulations show that conduction efficacy is influenced by the type of cell being stimulated and, in case of depolarization, by the stimulation strength. Particularly, simultaneous stimulation of both endothelial and vascular smooth muscle cells augments conduction. Between vessels, the specific electrophysiology determines membrane resistance and conduction efficiency-notably depolarization or radial currents reduce electrical spread. Random cell-cell variation, ubiquitous in biological systems, only cause small or no reduction in conduction efficiency. Collectively, our simulations can explain why CVRs from hyperpolarizing stimuli tend to conduct longer than CVRs from depolarizing stimuli and why agonists like acetylcholine induce CVRs that tend to conduct longer than electrical injections. The findings demonstrate that although substantial heterogeneity is observed in conducted responses, it can be largely ascribed to the origin of electrical stimulus combined with the specific electrophysiological properties of the arteriole. We conclude by outlining a set of "principles of electrical conduction" in the microcirculation.
微循环中血流的调节依赖于同步的血管舒缩反应。血管传导反应是一种同步扩张或收缩,由沿着血管壁传播的局部电活动引发。然而,尽管其本质是电活动,但在同一血管床内不同起始刺激之间以及同一刺激作用于不同血管床时,传导反应的效能存在显著差异。这些差异促使人们提出了不同的机制来解释实验观察到的变化。我们采用一种允许引入结构和电生理异质性的计算方法,系统地测试了小动脉电生理和刺激模式的变化。在同一血管内,我们的模拟结果表明,传导效能受被刺激细胞类型的影响,在去极化情况下还受刺激强度的影响。特别是,同时刺激内皮细胞和血管平滑肌细胞会增强传导。在不同血管之间,特定的电生理特性决定膜电阻和传导效率——尤其是去极化或径向电流会降低电传播。生物系统中普遍存在的随机细胞间差异只会导致传导效率小幅降低或不降低。总体而言,我们的模拟可以解释为什么超极化刺激引起的血管传导反应往往比去极化刺激引起的传导反应传导得更远;以及为什么像乙酰胆碱这样的激动剂诱导的血管传导反应往往比电注入诱导的传导反应传导得更远。这些发现表明,尽管在传导反应中观察到大量异质性,但这在很大程度上可归因于电刺激的起源以及小动脉的特定电生理特性。我们通过概述微循环中一组“电传导原理”来得出结论。