• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探索斯特鲁普任务中任务冲突与信息冲突之间的关系。

Exploring relations between task conflict and informational conflict in the Stroop task.

作者信息

Entel Olga, Tzelgov Joseph, Bereby-Meyer Yoella, Shahar Nitzan

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Zlotowski Center for Neuroscience, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, P.O.B. 653, Beer Sheva, 84105, Israel.

Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, 84105, Israel.

出版信息

Psychol Res. 2015 Nov;79(6):913-27. doi: 10.1007/s00426-014-0630-0. Epub 2014 Nov 25.

DOI:10.1007/s00426-014-0630-0
PMID:25420632
Abstract

In this study, we tested the proposal that the Stroop task involves two conflicts--task conflict and informational conflict. Task conflict was defined as the latency difference between color words and non-letter neutrals, and manipulated by varying the proportion of color words versus non-letter neutrals. Informational conflict was defined as the latency difference between incongruent and congruent trials and manipulated by varying the congruent-to-incongruent trial ratio. We replicated previous findings showing that increasing the ratio of incongruent-to-congruent trials reduces the latency difference between the incongruent and congruent condition (i.e., informational conflict), as does increasing the proportion of color words (i.e., task conflict). A significant under-additive interaction between the two proportion manipulations (congruent vs. incongruent and color words vs. neutrals) indicated that the effects of task conflict and informational conflict were not additive. By assessing task conflict as the contrast between color words and neutrals, we found that task conflict existed in all of our experimental conditions. Under specific conditions, when task conflict dominated behavior by explaining most of the variability between congruency conditions, we also found negative facilitation, thus demonstrating that this effect is a special case of task conflict.

摘要

在本研究中,我们检验了如下观点:斯特鲁普任务涉及两种冲突——任务冲突和信息冲突。任务冲突被定义为颜色词与非字母中性刺激之间的潜伏期差异,并通过改变颜色词与非字母中性刺激的比例来操纵。信息冲突被定义为不一致试验与一致试验之间的潜伏期差异,并通过改变一致试验与不一致试验的比例来操纵。我们重复了先前的研究结果,即增加不一致试验与一致试验的比例会减少不一致条件与一致条件之间的潜伏期差异(即信息冲突),增加颜色词的比例(即任务冲突)也会有同样的效果。两种比例操纵(一致与不一致以及颜色词与中性刺激)之间存在显著的次加性交互作用,这表明任务冲突和信息冲突的效应并非相加的。通过将任务冲突评估为颜色词与中性刺激之间的对比,我们发现在所有实验条件下都存在任务冲突。在特定条件下,当任务冲突通过解释一致性条件之间的大部分变异性而主导行为时,我们还发现了负启动效应,从而证明这种效应是任务冲突的一种特殊情况。

相似文献

1
Exploring relations between task conflict and informational conflict in the Stroop task.探索斯特鲁普任务中任务冲突与信息冲突之间的关系。
Psychol Res. 2015 Nov;79(6):913-27. doi: 10.1007/s00426-014-0630-0. Epub 2014 Nov 25.
2
Stop interfering: Stroop task conflict independence from informational conflict and interference.停止干扰:斯特鲁普任务冲突独立于信息冲突和干扰。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013;66(7):1356-67. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.741606. Epub 2012 Nov 19.
3
Focusing on task conflict in the Stroop effect.关注斯特鲁普效应中的任务冲突。
Psychol Res. 2018 Mar;82(2):284-295. doi: 10.1007/s00426-016-0832-8. Epub 2016 Dec 3.
4
Modulation of conflicts in the Stroop effect.斯特鲁普效应中冲突的调节
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Sep;189:93-102. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.10.007. Epub 2017 Nov 1.
5
Evidence for interaction between the stop signal and the Stroop task conflict.停止信号与 Stroop 任务冲突之间相互作用的证据。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Apr;39(2):579-92. doi: 10.1037/a0027429. Epub 2012 Mar 5.
6
Perceptual conflict-induced late positive complex in a modified Stroop task.在修改后的 Stroop 任务中,知觉冲突引起的晚正成分。
Neurosci Lett. 2013 May 10;542:76-80. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2013.01.056. Epub 2013 Feb 15.
7
Assessing stimulus-stimulus (semantic) conflict in the Stroop task using saccadic two-to-one color response mapping and preresponse pupillary measures.使用扫视二对一颜色反应映射和反应前瞳孔测量法评估Stroop任务中的刺激-刺激(语义)冲突。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2015 Nov;77(8):2601-10. doi: 10.3758/s13414-015-0971-9.
8
Converging evidence for control of color-word Stroop interference at the item level.控制颜色-词 Stroop 干扰的项目水平的汇聚证据。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Apr;39(2):433-49. doi: 10.1037/a0029145. Epub 2012 Jul 30.
9
Adjustment of control in the numerical Stroop task.数字斯特鲁普任务中控制的调整。
Mem Cognit. 2017 Aug;45(6):891-902. doi: 10.3758/s13421-017-0703-6.
10
The interactive effects of listwide control, item-based control, and working memory capacity on Stroop performance.列表宽度控制、项目控制和工作记忆容量对斯特鲁普绩效的交互影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Jul;37(4):851-60. doi: 10.1037/a0023437.

引用本文的文献

1
Impaired Interference Control in Individuals With Internet Addiction: Evidence From Event-Related Potentials and Brain Oscillations.网络成瘾个体的干扰控制受损:来自事件相关电位和脑振荡的证据。
Addict Biol. 2025 Jul;30(7):e70062. doi: 10.1111/adb.70062.
2
Practice makes better? The influence of increased practice on task conflict in the Stroop task.熟能生巧?练习增加对斯特鲁普任务中任务冲突的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2025 Jan 25. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01677-7.
3
Age-related differences in information, but not task control in the color-word Stroop task.

本文引用的文献

1
Conflict-triggered top-down control: default mode, last resort, or no such thing?冲突触发的自上而下控制:默认模式、最后手段,还是并不存在?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 Mar;40(2):567-87. doi: 10.1037/a0035032. Epub 2013 Nov 25.
2
Preparation time modulates pro-active control and enhances task conflict in task switching.准备时间调节了前摄控制并增强了任务转换中的任务冲突。
Psychol Res. 2014 Mar;78(2):276-88. doi: 10.1007/s00426-013-0495-7. Epub 2013 May 28.
3
The Parallel Episodic Processing (PEP) model: dissociating contingency and conflict adaptation in the item-specific proportion congruent paradigm.
在颜色-文字斯特鲁普任务中,信息方面存在与年龄相关的差异,但任务控制方面不存在。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Jan 17. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02631-z.
4
Onset complexity and task conflict in the Stroop task.斯特鲁普任务中的起始复杂性和任务冲突
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2025 May;78(5):978-996. doi: 10.1177/17470218231214515. Epub 2023 Dec 4.
5
Local and global control adjustments to stimulus-based task conflict in task switching.任务切换中基于刺激的任务冲突的局部和全局控制调整。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2025 May;78(5):963-977. doi: 10.1177/17470218231200442. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
6
Resting Stroop task: Evidence of task conflict in trials with no required response.静息态斯特鲁普任务:无要求反应试验中任务冲突的证据。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Feb;31(1):353-360. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02354-7. Epub 2023 Aug 24.
7
Do Task Sets Compete in the Stroop Task and Other Selective Attention Paradigms?任务集在斯特鲁普任务及其他选择性注意范式中会相互竞争吗?
J Cogn. 2023 May 4;6(1):23. doi: 10.5334/joc.272. eCollection 2023.
8
What is word? The boundary conditions of task conflict in the Stroop task.什么是单词?Stroop 任务中任务冲突的边界条件。
Psychol Res. 2023 Jun;87(4):1208-1218. doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01738-z. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
9
Common and unique neural mechanisms of social and nonsocial conflict resolving and adaptation.社会和非社会冲突解决和适应的常见和独特的神经机制。
Cereb Cortex. 2023 Mar 21;33(7):3773-3786. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhac306.
10
The effect of proportion manipulation on the size-congruency and distance effects in the numerical Stroop task.比例操纵对数字斯特鲁普任务中大小一致性和距离效应的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2022 Oct;50(7):1578-1589. doi: 10.3758/s13421-022-01292-4. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
平行情景加工(PEP)模型:在特定项目比例一致性范式中分离偶然性和冲突适应
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2013 Jan;142(1):119-26. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.11.004. Epub 2012 Dec 20.
4
Converging evidence for control of color-word Stroop interference at the item level.控制颜色-词 Stroop 干扰的项目水平的汇聚证据。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Apr;39(2):433-49. doi: 10.1037/a0029145. Epub 2012 Jul 30.
5
Evidence for interaction between the stop signal and the Stroop task conflict.停止信号与 Stroop 任务冲突之间相互作用的证据。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Apr;39(2):579-92. doi: 10.1037/a0027429. Epub 2012 Mar 5.
6
Revealing list-level control in the Stroop task by uncovering its benefits and a cost.通过揭示 Stroop 任务的收益和代价,揭示其在列表级别的控制。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2011 Oct;37(5):1595-606. doi: 10.1037/a0024670.
7
The interactive effects of listwide control, item-based control, and working memory capacity on Stroop performance.列表宽度控制、项目控制和工作记忆容量对斯特鲁普绩效的交互影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Jul;37(4):851-60. doi: 10.1037/a0023437.
8
Contingency learning and unlearning in the blink of an eye: a resource dependent process.瞬息之间的条件学习和遗忘:一种依赖资源的过程。
Conscious Cogn. 2010 Mar;19(1):235-50. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2009.12.016. Epub 2010 Jan 29.
9
Behavioral and neural evidence for item-specific performance monitoring.行为和神经证据表明存在项目特异性的表现监测。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Dec;22(12):2758-67. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21365.
10
Distinguishing response conflict and task conflict in the Stroop task: evidence from ex-Gaussian distribution analysis.在斯特鲁普任务中区分反应冲突和任务冲突:来自高斯分布分析的证据。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Oct;35(5):1398-412. doi: 10.1037/a0016467.