Reynolds Arthur J, Richardson Brandt A, Hayakawa Momoko, Lease Erin M, Warner-Richter Mallory, Englund Michelle M, Ou Suh-Ruu, Sullivan Molly
Institute of Child Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis2Human Capital Research Collaborative, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis4Humphrey School of Public Affairs, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
Human Capital Research Collaborative, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis3Department of Applied Economics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
JAMA. 2014 Nov 26;312(20):2126-34. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.15376.
Early childhood interventions have demonstrated positive effects on well-being. Whether full-day vs part-day attendance improves outcomes is unknown.
To evaluate the association between a full- vs part-day early childhood program and school readiness, attendance, and parent involvement.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: End-of-preschool follow-up of a nonrandomized, matched-group cohort of predominantly low-income, ethnic minority children enrolled in the Child-Parent Centers (CPC) for the full day (7 hours; n = 409) or part day (3 hours on average; n = 573) in the 2012-2013 school year in 11 schools in Chicago, Illinois.
The Midwest CPC Education Program provides comprehensive instruction, family-support, and health services from preschool to third grade.
School readiness skills at the end of preschool, attendance and chronic absences, and parental involvement. The readiness domains in the Teaching Strategies GOLD Assessment System include a total of 49 items with a score range of 105-418. The specific domains are socioemotional with 9 items (score range, 20-81), language with 6 items (score range, 15-54), literacy with 12 items (score range, 9-104), math with 7 items (score, 8-60), physical health with 5 items (score range, 14-45), and cognitive development with 10 items (score range, 18-90).
Full-day preschool participants had higher scores than part-day peers on socioemotional development (58.6 vs 54.5; difference, 4.1; 95% CI, 0.5-7.6; P = .03), language (39.9 vs 37.3; difference, 2.6; 95% CI, 0.6-4.6; P = .01), math (40.0 vs 36.4; difference, 3.6; 95% CI, 0.5-6.7; P = .02), physical health (35.5 vs 33.6; difference, 1.9; 95% CI, 0.5-3.2; P = .006), and the total score (298.1 vs 278.2; difference, 19.9; 95% CI, 1.2-38.4; P = .04). Literacy (64.5 vs 58.6; difference, 5.9; 95% CI, -0.07 to 12.4; P = .08) and cognitive development (59.7 vs 57.7; difference, 2.0; 95% CI, -2.4 to 6.3; P = .38) were not significant. Full-day preschool graduates also had higher rates of attendance (85.9% vs 80.4%; difference, 5.5; 95% CI, 2.6-8.4; P = .001) and lower rates of chronic absences (≥10% days missed; 53.0% vs 71.6%; difference, -18.6; 95% CI, -28.5 to -8.7; P = .001; ≥20% days missed; 21.2% vs 38.8%; difference -17.6%; 95% CI, -25.6 to -9.7; P < .001) but no differences in parental involvement.
In an expansion of the CPCs in Chicago, a full-day preschool intervention was associated with increased school readiness skills in 4 of 6 domains, attendance, and reduced chronic absences compared with a part-day program. These findings should be replicated in other programs and contexts.
幼儿期干预已被证明对幸福感有积极影响。全日制与半日制入学是否能改善结果尚不清楚。
评估全日制与半日制幼儿项目与入学准备、出勤率和家长参与度之间的关联。
设计、背景和参与者:对2012 - 2013学年伊利诺伊州芝加哥11所学校中主要为低收入少数族裔儿童的非随机匹配组队列进行学前教育结束时的随访。这些儿童全日制(7小时;n = 409)或半日制(平均3小时;n = 573)就读于儿童-家长中心(CPC)。
中西部儿童-家长中心教育项目提供从学前班到三年级的全面教学、家庭支持和健康服务。
学前教育结束时的入学准备技能、出勤率和长期缺勤情况以及家长参与度。教学策略黄金评估系统中的入学准备领域共有49项,得分范围为105 - 418。具体领域包括社会情感(9项;得分范围20 - 81)、语言(6项;得分范围15 - 54)、读写能力(12项;得分范围9 - 104)、数学(7项;得分8 - 60)、身体健康(5项;得分范围14 - 45)以及认知发展(10项;得分范围18 - 90)。
全日制学前班参与者在社会情感发展(58.6对54.5;差异4.1;95%置信区间0.5 - 7.6;P = 0.03)、语言(39.9对37.3;差异2.6;95%置信区间0.6 - 4.6;P = 0.01)、数学(40.0对36.4;差异3.6;95%置信区间0.5 - 6.7;P = 0.02)、身体健康(35.5对33.6;差异1.9;95%置信区间0.5 - 3.2;P = 0.006)以及总分(298.1对278.2;差异19.9;95%置信区间1.2 - 38.4;P = 0.04)方面的得分高于半日制同龄人。读写能力(64.5对58.6;差异5.9;95%置信区间 - 0.07至12.4;P = 0.08)和认知发展(59.7对57.7;差异2.0;95%置信区间 - 2.4至6.3;P = 0.38)方面差异不显著。全日制学前班毕业生的出勤率也更高(85.9%对80.4%;差异5.5;95%置信区间2.6 - 8.4;P = 0.001),长期缺勤率更低(≥10%的缺课天数;53.0%对71.6%;差异 - 18.6;95%置信区间 - 28.5至 - 8.7;P = 0.001;≥20%的缺课天数;21.2%对38.8%;差异 - 17.6%;95%置信区间 - 25.6至 - 9.7;P < 0.001),但家长参与度没有差异。
在芝加哥扩大儿童-家长中心项目中,与半日制项目相比,全日制学前教育干预与6个领域中的4个领域入学准备技能的提高、出勤率的增加以及长期缺勤率的降低相关。这些发现应在其他项目和背景中进行重复验证。