Institute of Child Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
Humphrey School of Public Affairs, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
JAMA Pediatr. 2018 Mar 1;172(3):247-256. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.4673.
Educational attainment is the leading social determinant of health, but few studies of prevention programs have examined whether the programs are associated with educational attainment outcomes after the mid-20s, especially for large-scale programs that provide a longer duration of services.
To examine the association between a preschool to third grade intervention and educational attainment at midlife and differences by program duration, sex, and parental educational level.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This matched-group, alternative intervention study assessed 1539 low-income minority children born in 1979 or 1980 who grew up in high-poverty neighborhoods in Chicago, Illinois. The comparison group included 550 children primarily from randomly selected schools participating in the usual early intervention. A total of 989 children who entered preschool in 1983 or 1984 and completed kindergarten in 1986 were included in the Chicago Longitudinal Study and were followed up for 27 to 30 years after the end of a multicomponent intervention. A total of 1398 participants (90.8%) in the original sample had educational attainment records at 35 years of age. The study was performed from January 1, 2002, through May 31, 2015.
The Child-Parent Center Program provides school-based educational enrichment and comprehensive family services from preschool to third grade (ages 3-9 years).
Educational outcomes from administrative records and self-report included school dropout, 4-year high school graduation, years of education, postsecondary credential, and earned degrees from associate's to master's or higher.
A total of 1539 participants (mean [SD] age, 35.1 [0.32] years; 1423 [92.9%] black and 108 [7.1%] Hispanic) were included in the study. After weighting on 2 propensity scores, preschool participants had higher rates of postsecondary degree completion, including associate's degree or higher (15.7% vs 10.7%; difference, 5.0%; 95% CI, 1.0%-9.0%), master's degree (4.2% vs 1.5%; difference, 2.7%; 95% CI, 1.3%-4.1%), and years of education (12.81 vs 12.32; difference, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.20-0.77). Duration of participation showed a consistent linear association with outcomes. Compared with fewer years, preschool to second or third grade participation led to higher rates of associate's degree or higher (18.5% vs 12.5%; difference, 6.0%; 95% CI, 1.0%-11.0%), bachelor's degree (14.3% vs 8.2%; difference, 6.1%; 95% CI, 1.3%-10.9%), and master's degree or higher (5.9% vs 2.3%; difference, 3.6%; 95% CI, 1.4%-5.9%). The pattern of benefits was robust and favored male participants for high school graduation, female participants for college attainment, and those from lower-educated households.
This study indicates that an established early and continuing intervention is associated with higher midlife postsecondary attainment. Replication and extension of findings to other locations and populations should further strengthen confidence in the health benefits of large-scale preventive interventions.
重要性:教育程度是健康的主要社会决定因素,但很少有预防计划的研究检验这些计划是否与 20 多岁以后的教育程度结果相关,特别是对于提供更长服务时间的大规模计划。
目的:研究学前至三年级干预措施与中年时教育程度的关系,并根据项目持续时间、性别和父母教育水平的差异进行研究。
设计、地点和参与者:本匹配组、替代干预研究评估了 1979 年或 1980 年在伊利诺伊州芝加哥高贫困社区长大的 1539 名低收入少数族裔儿童。对照组包括主要来自随机选择的学校的 550 名儿童,这些学校参加了通常的早期干预。共有 989 名在 1983 年或 1984 年进入学前班并在 1986 年完成幼儿园的儿童被纳入芝加哥纵向研究,并在多组分干预结束后随访 27 至 30 年。原始样本中共有 1398 名参与者(90.8%)在 35 岁时有教育程度记录。该研究于 2002 年 1 月 1 日至 2015 年 5 月 31 日进行。
干预措施:儿童-家长中心计划从学前到三年级(3-9 岁)提供基于学校的教育丰富和综合家庭服务。
主要结果和测量:从行政记录和自我报告中得出的教育结果包括辍学、4 年高中毕业、受教育年限、中学后证书和副学士到硕士或更高学位的获得。
结果:共有 1539 名参与者(平均[SD]年龄 35.1[0.32]岁;1423[92.9%]名黑人,108[7.1%]名西班牙裔)被纳入研究。在对 2 个倾向评分进行加权后,学前组完成中学后学位的比例更高,包括副学士或更高(15.7%对 10.7%;差异 5.0%;95%CI 1.0%-9.0%)、硕士(4.2%对 1.5%;差异 2.7%;95%CI 1.3%-4.1%)和受教育年限(12.81 对 12.32;差异 0.49;95%CI 0.20-0.77)。参与时间与结果呈一致的线性关联。与参与时间较短相比,从学前到第二或第三年的参与导致获得副学士或更高学位的比例更高(18.5%对 12.5%;差异 6.0%;95%CI 1.0%-11.0%)、学士学位(14.3%对 8.2%;差异 6.1%;95%CI 1.3%-10.9%)和硕士或更高学位(5.9%对 2.3%;差异 3.6%;95%CI 1.4%-5.9%)。这种受益模式是稳健的,有利于高中毕业生中的男性参与者、大学毕业生中的女性参与者以及来自教育程度较低家庭的参与者。
结论和相关性:本研究表明,一项既定的早期和持续干预措施与中年后获得中学后学位的比例较高相关。将研究结果复制和扩展到其他地点和人群,应进一步增强对大规模预防干预措施对健康的益处的信心。