Natsopoulou Myrsini E, McMahon Dino P, Doublet Vincent, Bryden John, Paxton Robert J
Institut für Biologie, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Hoher Weg 8, Halle (Saale) 06120, Germany
Institut für Biologie, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Hoher Weg 8, Halle (Saale) 06120, Germany School of Biological Sciences, MBC, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast BT9 7BL, UK Institute of Biology, Freie Universität Berlin, Schwendenerstr. 1, Berlin 14195, Germany Department for Materials and Environment, BAM Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing, Unter den Eichen 87, Berlin 12205, Germany.
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Jan 7;282(1798):20141896. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.1896.
There is increasing appreciation that hosts in natural populations are subject to infection by multiple parasite species. Yet the epidemiological and ecological processes determining the outcome of mixed infections are poorly understood. Here, we use two intracellular gut parasites (Microsporidia), one exotic and one co-evolved in the western honeybee (Apis mellifera), in an experiment in which either one or both parasites were administered either simultaneously or sequentially. We provide clear evidence of within-host competition; order of infection was an important determinant of the competitive outcome between parasites, with the first parasite significantly inhibiting the growth of the second, regardless of species. However, the strength of this 'priority effect' was highly asymmetric, with the exotic Nosema ceranae exhibiting stronger inhibition of Nosema apis than vice versa. Our results reveal an unusual asymmetry in parasite competition that is dependent on order of infection. When incorporated into a mathematical model of disease prevalence, we find asymmetric competition to be an important predictor of the patterns of parasite prevalence found in nature. Our findings demonstrate the wider significance of complex multi-host-multi-parasite interactions as drivers of host-pathogen community structure.
人们越来越认识到,自然种群中的宿主会受到多种寄生虫物种的感染。然而,决定混合感染结果的流行病学和生态过程却知之甚少。在这里,我们在一项实验中使用了两种细胞内肠道寄生虫(微孢子虫),一种是外来的,另一种是与西方蜜蜂(Apis mellifera)共同进化的,在实验中,要么同时施用一种或两种寄生虫,要么依次施用。我们提供了宿主内竞争的明确证据;感染顺序是寄生虫之间竞争结果的一个重要决定因素,无论物种如何,第一种寄生虫都会显著抑制第二种寄生虫的生长。然而,这种“优先效应”的强度是高度不对称的,外来的中华蜜蜂微孢子虫(Nosema ceranae)对蜜蜂微孢子虫(Nosema apis)的抑制作用比反之更强。我们的结果揭示了寄生虫竞争中一种不寻常的不对称性,这种不对称性取决于感染顺序。当纳入疾病流行率的数学模型时,我们发现不对称竞争是自然界中发现的寄生虫流行模式的一个重要预测因子。我们的研究结果证明了复杂的多宿主 - 多寄生虫相互作用作为宿主 - 病原体群落结构驱动因素的更广泛意义。