Suppr超能文献

超声引导下连续收肌管阻滞用于全膝关节置换术后镇痛

Ultrasound-guided continuous adductor canal block for analgesia after total knee replacement.

作者信息

Zhang Wei, Hu Yan, Tao Yan, Liu Xuebing, Wang Geng

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing 100035, China.

Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing 100035, China. Email: w

出版信息

Chin Med J (Engl). 2014;127(23):4077-81.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are several methods for postoperative analgesia for knee surgery. The commonly utilized method is multimodal analgesia based on continuous femoral nerve block. The aim of this study was to investigate the application of continuous adductor canal block for analgesia after total knee replacement and compare this method with continuous femoral nerve block.

METHODS

Sixty patients scheduled for total knee replacement from June 2013 to March 2014 were randomly divided into a femoral group and an adductor group. Catheters were placed under the guidance of nerve stimulation in the femoral group and under the guidance of ultrasound in the adductor group. Operations were performed under combined spinal and epidural anesthesia. After the operations, 0.2% ropivacaine was given at a speed of 5 ml/h through catheters in all patients. Visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores at rest and while moving were noted at 4, 24, and 48 hours after the operation, and quadriceps strength was also assessed at these time-points. Secondary parameters such as doses of complementary analgesics and side effects were also recorded.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the groups in VAS pain scores at rest or while moving, at 4, 24, or 48 hours after the operation (P > 0.05). At these time-points, mean quadriceps strengths in the adductor group were 3.0 (2.75-3.0), 3.0 (3.0-4.0), and 4.0 (3.0-4.0), respectively, all of which were significantly stronger than the corresponding means in the femoral group, which were 2.0 (2.0-3.0), 2.0 (2.0-3.0), and 3.0 (2.0-4.0), respectively (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the groups in doses of complementary analgesics or side effects (P > 0.05). X-ray images of some patients showed that local anesthetic administered into the adductor canal could diffuse upward and reach the femoral triangle.

CONCLUSIONS

Continuous adductor canal block with 0.2% ropivacaine could be used effectively for analgesia after total knee replacement. Compared with continuous femoral nerve block, this analgesic method has similar analgesic effects and is associated with less weakness of quadriceps muscle.

摘要

背景

膝关节手术术后镇痛有多种方法。常用方法是基于持续股神经阻滞的多模式镇痛。本研究的目的是探讨持续收肌管阻滞在全膝关节置换术后镇痛中的应用,并将该方法与持续股神经阻滞进行比较。

方法

将2013年6月至2014年3月计划行全膝关节置换术的60例患者随机分为股神经组和收肌管组。股神经组在神经刺激引导下置管,收肌管组在超声引导下置管。手术在腰麻联合硬膜外麻醉下进行。术后,所有患者均通过导管以5 ml/h的速度给予0.2%罗哌卡因。记录术后4、24和48小时静息和活动时的视觉模拟评分(VAS)疼痛评分,并在这些时间点评估股四头肌力量。还记录了辅助镇痛药剂量和副作用等次要参数。

结果

术后4、24或48小时,两组静息或活动时的VAS疼痛评分无显著差异(P>0.05)。在这些时间点,收肌管组股四头肌平均力量分别为3.0(2.75 - 3.0)、3.0(3.0 - 4.0)和4.0(3.0 - 4.0),均显著强于股神经组相应的平均值,分别为2.0(2.0 - 3.0)、2.0(2.0 - 3.0)和3.0(2.0 - 4.0)(P<0.05)。两组辅助镇痛药剂量或副作用无显著差异(P>0.05)。部分患者的X线图像显示,注入收肌管的局部麻醉药可向上扩散至股三角。

结论

0.2%罗哌卡因持续收肌管阻滞可有效用于全膝关节置换术后镇痛。与持续股神经阻滞相比,该镇痛方法具有相似的镇痛效果,且股四头肌无力的情况较少。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验