Yang Xiaojuan, Dong Jun, Xiong Wei, Huang Fusen
The Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Emerg Med Int. 2022 May 11;2022:1351480. doi: 10.1155/2022/1351480. eCollection 2022.
The aim of this study was to compare pain control and inflammation among patients who received a continuous adductor canal block (CACB) versus single-shot adductor canal block (SACB) combined with patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) analgesia in the first two days after surgery.
Matched cohort retrospective study. . University hospital. . One hundred fifty-six patient charts were included in this study: 78 patients with CACB in Group A and 78 patients with SACB combined with PCIA in Group B. Patients were matched according to age, body mass index, and American Society of Anesthesiologists class. . The primary outcome of the study was Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain scores before operation (Pre) and at postoperative 6 (POH6), 12 (POH12), 24 (POH24), 30 (POH30), 36 (POH36), and 48 hours (POH48). Secondary outcomes included patient-controlled bolus, time of first postoperative ambulation, range of knee flexion and extension, inflammation cytokines on Pre and POH48, percentage of remedial analgesics treatment, incidence of adverse events and complications, hospital stay and cost, and Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) satisfaction scores at discharge. . Mean VAS scores at rest and with motion were lower in Group B than in Group A on all postoperative hours. At POH30, compared with Group A (1.1 ± 0.6), mean VAS scores at rest in Group B (0.9 ± 0.4) were lower (=0.048), and compared with Group A (2.6 ± 0.7), mean VAS scores with motion in Group B (2.2 ± 0.8) were lower (=0.001). The number of patient-controlled bolus was 4.3 ± 1.6 (95% CI 3.9-4.6) in Group A and 3.1 ± 1.3 (95% CI 2.8-3.4) in Group B, respectively ( < 0.001). Patients in Group B displayed better functional recovery and inflammation results at POH48 than Group A with respect to range of knee flexion and extension (117.8 ± 10.9° vs. 125.2 ± 9.4°, < 0.001) and inflammation cytokines, including erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), and interleukin-6 (IL-6) ((43.8 ± 16.1) vs. (36.8 ± 13.2), =0.003; (34.9 ± 9.4 mg/L) vs. (29.6 ± 10.6 mg/L), =0.001; (21.3 ± 8.7 pg/ml) vs. (14.0 ± 7.0 pg/ml), < 0.001)).
SACB combined with PCIA in the first two days of patients undergoing TKA has better analgesic and beneficial effects on functional recovery and inflammation.
本研究旨在比较接受持续内收肌管阻滞(CACB)与单次内收肌管阻滞(SACB)联合患者自控静脉镇痛(PCIA)的全膝关节置换术(TKA)患者术后前两天的疼痛控制情况和炎症反应。
匹配队列回顾性研究。大学医院。本研究纳入156例患者病历:A组78例接受CACB的患者,B组78例接受SACB联合PCIA的患者。患者根据年龄、体重指数和美国麻醉医师协会分级进行匹配。本研究的主要结局指标为术前(Pre)、术后6小时(POH6)、12小时(POH12)、24小时(POH24)、30小时(POH30)、36小时(POH36)和48小时(POH48)的视觉模拟评分(VAS)疼痛评分。次要结局指标包括患者自控推注次数、首次术后下床活动时间、膝关节屈伸范围、术前和POH48时的炎症细胞因子、补救性镇痛治疗的百分比、不良事件和并发症的发生率、住院时间和费用,以及出院时的数字评分量表(NRS)满意度评分。术后各小时,B组静息和活动时的平均VAS评分均低于A组。在POH30时,与A组(1.1±0.6)相比,B组静息时的平均VAS评分(0.9±0.4)更低(P=0.048),与A组(2.6±0.7)相比,B组活动时的平均VAS评分(2.2±0.8)更低(P=0.001)。A组和B组患者自控推注次数分别为4.3±1.6(95%CI 3.9-4.6)和3.1±1.3(95%CI 2.8-3.4)(P<0.001)。在POH48时,B组患者在膝关节屈伸范围(117.8±10.9° vs. 125.2±9.4°,P<0.001)和炎症细胞因子,包括红细胞沉降率(ESR)、C反应蛋白(CRP)和白细胞介素-6(IL-6)((43.8±16.1) vs. (36.8±13.2),P=0.003;(34.9±9.4mg/L) vs. (29.6±10.6mg/L),P=0.001;(21.3±8.7pg/ml) vs. (14.0±7.0pg/ml),P<0.001)方面的功能恢复和炎症反应结果优于A组。
TKA患者术后前两天SACB联合PCIA具有更好的镇痛效果,对功能恢复和炎症反应有有益影响。