MRC Institute of Hearing Research , Nottingham , UK.
Front Neurol. 2014 Nov 13;5:228. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2014.00228. eCollection 2014.
In recent years, there has been a significant increase in the use of electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) to investigate changes in oscillatory brain activity associated with tinnitus with many conflicting results. Current view of the underlying mechanism of tinnitus is that it results from changes in brain activity in various structures of the brain as a consequence of sensory deprivation. This in turn gives rise to increased spontaneous activity and/or synchrony in the auditory centers but also involves modulation from non-auditory processes from structures of the limbic and paralimbic system. Some of the neural changes associated with tinnitus may be assessed non-invasively in human beings with MEG and EEG (M/EEG) in ways, which are superior to animal studies and other non-invasive imaging techniques. However, both MEG and EEG have their limitations and research results can be misinterpreted without appropriate consideration of these limitations. In this article, I intend to provide a brief review of these techniques, describe what the recorded signals reflect in terms of the underlying neural activity, and their strengths and limitations. I also discuss some pertinent methodological issues involved in tinnitus-related studies and conclude with suggestions to minimize possible discrepancies between results. The overall message is that while MEG and EEG are extremely useful techniques, the interpretation of results from tinnitus studies requires much caution given the individual variability in oscillatory activity and the limits of these techniques.
近年来,脑电图(EEG)和脑磁图(MEG)被广泛用于研究与耳鸣相关的振荡脑活动变化,其结果存在许多争议。目前,耳鸣的潜在机制被认为是由于感觉剥夺导致大脑各个结构的活动发生变化。这反过来又导致听觉中枢的自发性活动和/或同步性增加,但也涉及来自边缘和边缘系统结构的非听觉过程的调制。一些与耳鸣相关的神经变化可以通过 MEG 和 EEG(M/EEG)在人类中进行非侵入性评估,其方式优于动物研究和其他非侵入性成像技术。然而,MEG 和 EEG 都有其局限性,如果不适当考虑这些局限性,研究结果可能会被误解。在本文中,我旨在简要回顾这些技术,描述记录信号如何反映潜在的神经活动,以及它们的优缺点。我还讨论了与耳鸣相关研究中涉及的一些相关方法学问题,并提出了一些建议,以尽量减少结果之间可能存在的差异。总的来说,尽管 MEG 和 EEG 是非常有用的技术,但鉴于振荡活动的个体差异和这些技术的局限性,对耳鸣研究结果的解释需要非常谨慎。