Littlefield Andrew K, Stevens Angela K, Cunningham Sarah, Jones Rachel E, King Kevin M, Schumacher Julie A, Coffey Scott F
Texas Tech University, Department of Psychological Sciences, Box 42051, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA.
The University of Mississippi Medical Center, Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, 2500 N. State Street, Jackson, MS 39216, USA; Jesse Brown (Chicago) VA Medical Center, 820 S Damen Avenue, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Addict Behav. 2015 Mar;42:126-9. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.11.002. Epub 2014 Nov 8.
Although the relations between constructs related to impulsivity and substance use disorders (SUDs) are well established, recent research suggests that changes in impulsivity may be an important mechanism in the recovery process. However, this evidence is primarily based on studies that have examined the relation between changes in impulsivity and substance involvement across the span of several years using self-report measures; thus, it is unclear if these changes are linked across shorter time intervals or extend to behavioral methods of assessment.
Using prospective data from 43 participants (mean age=35.06; 60% female) enrolled in residential substance abuse treatment, the extent to which seven facets of impulsivity (i.e., questionnaire-assessed delay discounting, lack of perseverance, lack of planning, negative urgency, positive urgency, sensation seeking, and behaviorally-assessed inhibitory control) changed across approximately 4 weeks of treatment was examined.
Dependent group t-tests suggested significant reductions in negative urgency and lack of planning, and significant improvements in inhibitory control.
Findings indicate that specific impulsivity facets show change across relatively short time frames and suggest nonspecific effects of residential treatment on levels of impulsivity. These results inform the functional relation between facets of impulsivity and substance involvement and have implications for assessment and treatment approaches for SUDs.
尽管与冲动性相关的构念与物质使用障碍(SUDs)之间的关系已得到充分确立,但最近的研究表明,冲动性的变化可能是康复过程中的一个重要机制。然而,这一证据主要基于一些研究,这些研究使用自我报告测量方法,在数年时间跨度内考察了冲动性变化与物质使用情况之间的关系;因此,尚不清楚这些变化在较短时间间隔内是否相关,或者是否适用于行为评估方法。
利用43名参加住院药物滥用治疗的参与者(平均年龄=35.06岁;60%为女性)的前瞻性数据,研究了冲动性的七个方面(即问卷调查评估的延迟折扣、缺乏毅力、缺乏计划、消极紧迫性、积极紧迫性、寻求刺激和行为评估的抑制控制)在大约4周的治疗过程中的变化程度。
相关样本t检验表明,消极紧迫性和缺乏计划显著降低,抑制控制显著改善。
研究结果表明,特定的冲动性方面在相对较短的时间框架内会发生变化,并表明住院治疗对冲动性水平有非特异性影响。这些结果为冲动性方面与物质使用情况之间的功能关系提供了信息,并对SUDs的评估和治疗方法具有启示意义。