• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于在轻水反应堆(LWR)或其乏燃料池发生严重紧急情况后正确看待辐射健康危害的工具。

Tools for placing the radiological health hazard in perspective following a severe emergency at a light water reactor (LWR) or its spent fuel pool.

作者信息

McKenna Thomas, Welter Phillip Vilar, Callen Jessica, Martincic Rafael, Dodd Brian, Kutkov Vladimir

机构信息

*Incident and Emergency Centre, Department of Nuclear Safety and Security, International Atomic Energy Agency, Wagramerstrasse 5, A-1400 Vienna, Austria; †Brian Dodd Consulting, 10313 Cogswell Avenue, Las Vegas, NV 89134-5209.

出版信息

Health Phys. 2015 Jan;108(1):15-31. doi: 10.1097/HP.0000000000000157.

DOI:10.1097/HP.0000000000000157
PMID:25437516
Abstract

Experience from past nuclear and radiological emergencies shows that placing the radiological health hazard in perspective and having a definition of "safe" are required in order to prevent members of the public, those responsible for protecting the public (i.e., decision makers), and others from taking inappropriate and damaging actions that are not justified based on the radiological health hazard. The principle concerns of the public during a severe nuclear power plant or spent fuel pool emergency are "Am I safe?" and "What should I do to be safe?" However, these questions have not been answered to the satisfaction of the public, despite various protective actions being implemented to ensure their safety. Instead, calculated doses or various measured quantities (e.g., ambient dose rate or radionuclide concentrations) are used to describe the situation to the public without placing them into perspective in terms of the possible radiological health hazard, or if they have, it has been done incorrectly. This has contributed to members of the public taking actions that do more harm than good in the belief that they are protecting themselves. Based on established international guidance, this paper provides a definition of "safe" for the radiological health hazard for use in nuclear or radiological emergencies and a system for putting the radiological health hazard in perspective for quantities most commonly measured after a release resulting from a severe emergency at a light water reactor or its spent fuel pool.

摘要

以往核与辐射应急的经验表明,为防止公众、负责保护公众的人员(即决策者)及其他人员采取基于辐射健康危害并无正当理由的不当且有害行动,需正确看待辐射健康危害并明确“安全”的定义。在严重核电站或乏燃料池应急期间,公众主要关心的问题是“我安全吗?”以及“我该怎么做才能安全?”然而,尽管已采取各种保护行动以确保公众安全,但这些问题仍未得到令公众满意的解答。相反,在向公众描述情况时,只是使用计算得出的剂量或各种测量量(如环境剂量率或放射性核素浓度),却未根据可能的辐射健康危害正确看待这些量,即便有这样做,也是不正确的。这导致公众在认为自己在保护自己的情况下采取了弊大于利的行动。基于既定的国际准则,本文给出了在核或辐射应急中用于辐射健康危害的“安全”定义,以及一个针对轻水反应堆或其乏燃料池发生严重紧急情况释放后最常测量的量来正确看待辐射健康危害的系统。

相似文献

1
Tools for placing the radiological health hazard in perspective following a severe emergency at a light water reactor (LWR) or its spent fuel pool.用于在轻水反应堆(LWR)或其乏燃料池发生严重紧急情况后正确看待辐射健康危害的工具。
Health Phys. 2015 Jan;108(1):15-31. doi: 10.1097/HP.0000000000000157.
2
Protecting people against radiation exposure in the event of a radiological attack. A report of The International Commission on Radiological Protection.在发生放射性袭击时保护人们免受辐射照射。国际放射防护委员会的一份报告。
Ann ICRP. 2005;35(1):1-110, iii-iv. doi: 10.1016/j.icrp.2005.01.001.
3
Default operational intervention levels (OILs) for severe nuclear power plant or spent fuel pool emergencies.严重核电厂或乏燃料池事故的默认运行干预水平(OILs)。
Health Phys. 2013 May;104(5):459-70. doi: 10.1097/HP.0b013e318284d95c.
4
Radiological protection issues arising during and after the Fukushima nuclear reactor accident.福岛核反应堆事故期间及之后出现的放射防护问题。
J Radiol Prot. 2013 Sep;33(3):497-571. doi: 10.1088/0952-4746/33/3/497. Epub 2013 Jun 27.
5
Saving Lives and Preventing Injuries From Unjustified Protective Actions-Method for Developing a Comprehensive Public Protective Action Strategy for a Severe NPP Emergency.拯救生命并预防不合理防护行动造成的伤害——制定核电站严重事故综合公共防护行动策略的方法
Health Phys. 2018 May;114(5):511-526. doi: 10.1097/HP.0000000000000801.
6
Global nuclear industry views: challenges arising from the evolution of the optimisation principle in radiological protection.全球核工业观点:辐射防护中优化原则演变带来的挑战。
Ann ICRP. 2012 Oct-Dec;41(3-4):275-81. doi: 10.1016/j.icrp.2012.07.003. Epub 2012 Sep 12.
7
ICRP publication 109. Application of the Commission's Recommendations for the protection of people in emergency exposure situations.国际放射防护委员会第109号出版物。委员会关于在应急照射情况下保护人员的建议的应用。
Ann ICRP. 2009;39(1):1-110. doi: 10.1016/j.icrp.2009.05.004.
8
[Organization of the nuclear emergency plan].[核应急预案的组织架构]
Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg. 2005;67(5-6):337-40.
9
Protection of people living in long-term contaminated areas after a nuclear accident: the guidance of ICRP Publication 111.核事故后长期受污染地区居民的防护:国际放射防护委员会第111号出版物指南
J Radiol Prot. 2012 Mar;32(1):N95-9. doi: 10.1088/0952-4746/32/1/N95. Epub 2012 Mar 6.
10
ICRP PUBLICATION 122: radiological protection in geological disposal of long-lived solid radioactive waste.国际放射防护委员会第122号出版物:长寿命固体放射性废物地质处置中的辐射防护
Ann ICRP. 2013 Jun;42(3):1-57. doi: 10.1016/j.icrp.2013.01.001.