Ocular Oncology Service, Wills Eye Hospital, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Ocular Oncology Service, Wills Eye Hospital, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Ophthalmology. 2015 Feb;122(2):414-28. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.08.046. Epub 2014 Oct 14.
To review the management of ciliary body and choroidal melanoma (posterior uveal melanoma [PUM]) over the last century with an emphasis on changing concepts.
Retrospective review.
Review of personal experience over 40 years and pertinent literature on management of PUM.
Diagnosis and therapy for PUM.
Patient survival.
In the early 1900s, most patients presented with a large symptomatic melanoma that necessitated enucleation, and the systemic prognosis was poor. In the 1970s, controversy erupted regarding the role of enucleation for PUM. Some authorities advocated prompt enucleation, and others proposed that enucleation promoted metastasis, known as the "Zimmerman hypothesis." Others recommended observation, withholding treatment until tumor growth was documented. During the 1970s, there was a trend toward eye-saving procedures, including laser photocoagulation, surgical removal of tumor, and techniques of radiotherapy. Despite local treatment success, systemic prognosis remained guarded with approximately 40% mortality overall. However, there was convincing evidence that smaller tumors offered a significantly better prognosis. Currently, there is a movement toward earlier identification and treatment of small melanomas using clinical factors predictive of malignant potential, in keeping with similar philosophy regarding other cancers. Further understanding of melanoma cytogenetics and molecular pathways have helped to recognize patients at risk for metastasis. At-risk patients are offered systemic therapeutic trials to prevent metastasis. We anticipate that the future management of PUM will focus on detection of clinical and imaging clues for earliest diagnosis, prompt local tumor treatment, and systemic targeted therapies for microscopic metastasis or prevention of metastasis. Personalized evaluation of patient-specific melanoma molecular pathway signature could allow for therapeutic intervention at a site specific to the pathway abnormality that leads to the development of melanoma.
Management of PUM has made major strides over the past century from the days of enucleation for massive, fatal tumor to early detection of smallest tumors with a more favorable prognosis. Current and future targeted specific tumor pathway interruption using systemic agents could improve survival.
回顾上个世纪以来睫状体和脉络膜黑色素瘤(后葡萄膜黑色素瘤[PUM])的治疗方法,重点介绍不断变化的治疗理念。
回顾性研究。
回顾 40 多年的个人经验和有关 PUM 治疗的相关文献,对 PUM 的诊治进行讨论。
PUM 的诊断和治疗。
患者生存率。
在 20 世纪初,大多数患者表现为巨大的有症状黑色素瘤,需要进行眼球摘除术,且全身预后较差。在 20 世纪 70 年代,关于 PUM 行眼球摘除术的作用出现了争议。一些权威专家提倡及时行眼球摘除术,而另一些专家则认为眼球摘除术会促进转移,这就是所谓的“齐默尔曼假说”。还有一些专家建议观察,直到肿瘤生长被证实后再进行治疗。在 20 世纪 70 年代,出现了一种倾向于保眼治疗的趋势,包括激光光凝、肿瘤切除术和放射治疗技术。尽管局部治疗成功,但总体预后仍不容乐观,死亡率约为 40%。然而,有令人信服的证据表明,较小的肿瘤具有更好的预后。目前,人们倾向于使用预测恶性潜能的临床因素更早地识别和治疗小黑色素瘤,这与其他癌症的治疗理念相似。对黑色素瘤细胞遗传学和分子途径的进一步了解有助于识别有转移风险的患者。有转移风险的患者会接受全身治疗试验,以预防转移。我们预计,PUM 的未来治疗将侧重于通过临床和影像学线索尽早发现,及时进行局部肿瘤治疗,对微小转移或预防转移进行全身靶向治疗。对患者特定黑色素瘤分子途径特征进行个体化评估,可以针对导致黑色素瘤发展的途径异常进行特定部位的治疗干预。
在过去的一个世纪里,PUM 的治疗方法取得了重大进展,从对巨大、致命肿瘤进行眼球摘除术到对最小肿瘤进行早期检测,这些肿瘤具有更好的预后。目前和未来针对特定肿瘤途径的系统靶向药物干预可能会提高生存率。