Suppr超能文献

急诊科的及时疼痛管理。

Timely pain management in the emergency department.

作者信息

Patrick Patricia A, Rosenthal Barry M, Iezzi Carina A, Brand Donald A

机构信息

Office of Health Outcomes Research, Winthrop University Hospital, Mineola, New York; School of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York.

School of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York; Department of Emergency Medicine, Winthrop University Hospital, Mineola, New York.

出版信息

J Emerg Med. 2015 Mar;48(3):267-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2014.09.009. Epub 2014 Nov 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Delivering timely pain relief remains a challenge for most emergency departments.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of a policy aimed at delivering analgesics within 30 min to patients presenting to an emergency department with severe pain.

METHODS

Subjects were aged ≥19 years, had a principal diagnosis of renal colic, hip fracture, or sickle cell disease, reported a pain score ≥8 on a scale of 0 to 10 at triage, and continued to report a score in this range until receiving analgesia. The study compared proportions of patients receiving analgesics within the 30-min target, median time to analgesic administration, and median time to relief of severe pain (decline in pain level to score <8) during 6 months before vs. 6 months after implementation of the new pain management policy.

RESULTS

Paradoxically, the median total waiting time to analgesic administration increased from 64 min (n = 75) to 80 min (n = 70) after policy implementation (p = 0.01), and the proportion of patients receiving analgesics within 30 min declined from 17% (13/75) to 7% (5/70) (p = 0.08). Median time to relief of severe pain did not differ significantly between periods (130.5 vs. 153 min; p = 0.31).

CONCLUSIONS

After implementation of the new pain management policy, the proportion of patients with severe pain receiving analgesics within 30 min actually declined. Although a 30-min target may be unrealistic, it seems reasonable to conclude that something is wrong when patients with notoriously painful conditions must typically wait 1-2 h to obtain relief. Given the millions of individuals who receive care in emergency departments nationwide each year, the suffering caused by delays occurs on a large scale, so creative approaches are clearly needed to overcome the obstacles.

摘要

背景

对大多数急诊科来说,及时缓解疼痛仍是一项挑战。

目的

评估一项旨在对因剧痛前往急诊科就诊的患者在30分钟内给予镇痛药的政策的有效性。

方法

受试者年龄≥19岁,主要诊断为肾绞痛、髋部骨折或镰状细胞病,在分诊时报告疼痛评分在0至10分的量表上≥8分,并在接受镇痛前持续报告该范围内的评分。该研究比较了新疼痛管理政策实施前6个月与实施后6个月内,在30分钟目标时间内接受镇痛药的患者比例、给予镇痛药的中位时间以及重度疼痛缓解的中位时间(疼痛水平降至评分<8分)。

结果

矛盾的是,政策实施后,给予镇痛药的总中位等待时间从64分钟(n = 75)增加到80分钟(n = 70)(p = 0.01),且在30分钟内接受镇痛药的患者比例从17%(13/75)降至7%(5/70)(p = 0.08)。两个时期之间重度疼痛缓解的中位时间无显著差异(130.5分钟对153分钟;p = 0.31)。

结论

新疼痛管理政策实施后, 重度疼痛患者在30分钟内接受镇痛药的比例实际上下降了。尽管30分钟的目标可能不现实,但当患有剧痛疾病的患者通常必须等待1 - 2小时才能缓解疼痛时,可以合理地推断出存在问题。鉴于每年全国有数以百万计的人在急诊科接受治疗,延误造成的痛苦是大规模的,因此显然需要创新方法来克服这些障碍。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验