University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, England, UK.
University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, England, UK.
Public Health. 2014 Dec;128(12):1066-75. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2014.09.009. Epub 2014 Nov 24.
To undertake a scoping review and to map research in the area of digital media use in public health.
Scoping review.
PubMed, PsycINFO, Google and major textbooks of public health communication and health psychology were searched for primary studies or systematic reviews examining the use of digital media in a health context. Searches focussed on studies published between the start of 2000 and the end of June 2013. Abstracts of reviews of public health interventions were examined with respect to target groups, health topic, intervention characteristics, media used, study design, issues of quality and ethics, and outcomes. To map this area of work fully, this information was supplemented by adding information from primary studies. Areas were identified where systematic review evidence was scarce or non-existent by comparing the final map with information from the reviews analysed.
221 systematic reviews related to digital media use in a public health context were included. Most reviews included studies with an experimental design and general 'at risk' target populations. Specific settings were not specified in the majority of reviews. A large variety of health topics were covered. About a quarter of reviews did not specify a health topic but were concerned with broader issues of health promotion, disease prevention, or health education. Over half of the reviews focussed on eHealth and telemedicine, and another third were concerned with mass media - social marketing. Reviews most frequently reported behaviour-related outcomes or conducted some form of content analysis or analysis of the use of particular media. Research gaps were identified relating to community-based research, participation and empowerment, active media use (especially with respect to visual media und use of specific visual methodologies), and the use of salutogenic or assets-based approaches.
The available research relating to digital media use in public health is dominated by studies relating to eHealth, telehealth or social marketing; emphasising the passive reception of messages and a focus on individual behaviour change approaches. Issues of quality and ethics need to be taken into account more consistently. Further research is needed with respect to more participatory methods, particularly those which would seek to use digital media as a means to harness individual and community assets.
开展范围界定综述,绘制数字媒体在公共卫生领域应用的研究图谱。
范围界定综述。
检索了 PubMed、PsycINFO、Google 和公共卫生传播与健康心理学主要教科书,以查找在健康背景下使用数字媒体的原始研究或系统综述。搜索重点是 2000 年初至 2013 年 6 月底期间发表的研究。审查了公共卫生干预措施综述的摘要,以了解目标人群、健康主题、干预措施特征、使用的媒体、研究设计、质量和伦理问题以及结果。为了全面绘制这一领域的工作图,通过将这些信息与分析的综述信息进行比较,补充了来自原始研究的信息。在没有系统综述证据或证据很少的情况下,确定了特定领域,通过将最终图谱与综述分析信息进行比较。
共纳入 221 篇与公共卫生领域数字媒体使用相关的系统综述。大多数综述纳入了具有实验设计和一般“高危”目标人群的研究。但大多数综述并未具体说明特定的环境。涵盖的健康主题种类繁多。约四分之一的综述没有具体说明健康主题,但关注更广泛的健康促进、疾病预防或健康教育问题。超过一半的综述侧重于电子卫生和远程医疗,另有三分之一的综述涉及大众媒体——社会营销。综述最常报告行为相关结果,或进行某种形式的内容分析或特定媒体使用分析。确定了与社区研究、参与和赋权、积极媒体使用(特别是与视觉媒体和特定视觉方法的使用有关)以及使用健康促进或资产为基础的方法相关的研究空白。
公共卫生领域数字媒体使用的现有研究主要涉及电子卫生、远程医疗或社会营销,强调被动接收信息和注重个体行为改变方法。需要更一致地考虑质量和伦理问题。需要进一步研究更具参与性的方法,特别是那些试图利用数字媒体作为利用个人和社区资产的手段的方法。