• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Digital textbooks for undergraduate nursing education: a scoping review protocol.本科护理教育数字化教材:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 16;14(7):e071147. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071147.
2
Linguistically responsive learning and teaching for non-native speakers in undergraduate nursing education: a scoping review protocol.本科护理教育中非母语者的语言响应式学习与教学:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 3;14(8):e083181. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083181.
3
Internet of things platform technology used in undergraduate nursing student education: a scoping review protocol.本科护理学生教育中使用的物联网平台技术:一项范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 19;12(4):e058556. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058556.
4
Gender-affirming care in undergraduate nursing education: a scoping review protocol.本科护理教育中的性别肯定护理:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 14;13(3):e070576. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070576.
5
Nursing students' Health Literacy skills: a scoping review protocol for driving research.护理学生健康素养技能:推动研究的范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 20;14(2):e075682. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075682.
6
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
7
Digital Health Education and Training for Undergraduate and Graduate Nursing Students: Scoping Review.本科及研究生护理专业学生的数字健康教育与培训:范围综述
JMIR Nurs. 2024 Jul 17;7:e58170. doi: 10.2196/58170.
8
Sustainability of Interprofessional Education: Protocol for a Scoping Review.跨专业教育的可持续性:一项范围审查方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Dec 9;13:e60763. doi: 10.2196/60763.
9
Virtual simulation for teaching cardiology in nursing: a scoping review protocol.护理专业虚拟仿真教学在心脏内科学中的应用:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 4;14(10):e085965. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085965.
10
A protocol for a scoping review of the use of mental simulation and full-scale simulation in practising healthcare decision-making skills of undergraduate nursing students.一项针对使用心理模拟和全规模模拟来实践本科护理学生医疗保健决策技能的范围综述的方案。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2023 Aug;71:103699. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103699. Epub 2023 Jun 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Future direction of digital textbooks in undergraduate nursing education: A scoping review.本科护理教育中数字教科书的未来方向:一项范围综述。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 24;20(6):e0326109. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326109. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Learning styles, preferences and needs of generation Z healthcare students: Scoping review.Z 世代医学生的学习风格、偏好和需求:范围综述。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2021 Nov;57:103247. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103247. Epub 2021 Oct 26.
2
Predicting population health with machine learning: a scoping review.利用机器学习预测人群健康:一项范围综述
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 27;10(10):e037860. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037860.
3
Faculty development in the COVID-19 pandemic: So close - yet so far.新冠疫情期间的教师发展:近在咫尺——却又遥不可及。
Med Educ. 2020 Dec;54(12):1189-1190. doi: 10.1111/medu.14250. Epub 2020 Jun 19.
4
[Changes in Strauss & Corbin's Grounded Theory].[施特劳斯和科尔宾扎根理论的变化]
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2019 Oct;49(5):505-514. doi: 10.4040/jkan.2019.49.5.505.
5
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation.PRISMA 扩展用于范围审查 (PRISMA-ScR): 清单和解释。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
6
The Usefulness of the Electric Textbooks at Nursing Practicam by Analyzing the Usage Logs of the Terminal Tablet.通过分析终端平板电脑的使用日志探讨电子教科书在护理实习中的实用性
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2016;225:1038-9.
7
Nursing Student Perceptions of Digital Textbooks: A Pilot Study.护理专业学生对数字教科书的认知:一项试点研究。
Nurs Educ Perspect. 2016 Mar-Apr;37(2):107-9.
8
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement.系统评价与Meta分析方案的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)2015声明。
Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 1;4(1):1. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1.
9
Just telling and selling: current limitations in the use of digital media in public health: a scoping review.仅告知与销售:公共卫生领域数字媒体使用的当前局限:范围综述。
Public Health. 2014 Dec;128(12):1066-75. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2014.09.009. Epub 2014 Nov 24.
10
Does the inclusion of grey literature influence estimates of intervention effectiveness reported in meta-analyses?纳入灰色文献是否会影响荟萃分析中报告的干预效果估计?
Lancet. 2000 Oct 7;356(9237):1228-31. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02786-0.

本科护理教育数字化教材:范围综述方案。

Digital textbooks for undergraduate nursing education: a scoping review protocol.

机构信息

Nursing Department, Mokpo National University, Muan-gun, Jeollanam-do, Korea (the Republic of).

College of Nursing, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Korea (the Republic of)

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 16;14(7):e071147. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071147.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071147
PMID:39013648
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11331992/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Digital textbooks (DTs), in which students read dozens of paragraph clips and systematise their level of knowledge through new questions, can be an alternative for digital natives to consider. Developing DTs is required when teaching digital natives at undergraduate nursing schools. A scoping review is required to understand the current status of DTs in nursing education.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The preliminary search has been conducted to check whether the results produced by PubMed (NCBI) were published in English within 10 years and related to DTs. This study includes research targeting undergraduate nursing students. Literature will be further searched using Embase (Elsevier), Cochrane Library and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health (CINAHL) databases. This scoping review will also consider quantitative, qualitative, and mixed research methods, texts and opinion documents; review studies; and pilot tests. The chosen studies will first be extracted based on the scoping review data extraction section of Joanna Briggs Institute to identify their general characteristics. DTs will be analysed based on the e-textbook framework: information goods, technology and stakeholders.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The Institutional Review Board of Nambu University, South Korea, approved this study for review exemption (approval number: 1041478-2022-HR-009). The results of this study will be disseminated through research results to nursing education institutions and hospitals. OPEN SCIENCE FRAMEWORK: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/QS6WH.

摘要

简介

数字教科书(DTs),学生阅读几十个段落剪辑,并通过新问题系统地掌握他们的知识水平,可以成为数字原住民的一种选择。在本科护理学校教授数字原住民时需要开发 DTs。需要进行范围综述以了解护理教育中 DTs 的现状。

方法和分析

已经进行了初步搜索,以检查 NCBI PubMed 生成的结果是否在 10 年内以英文发表且与 DTs 相关。本研究包括针对本科护理学生的研究。将使用 Embase(Elsevier)、Cochrane 图书馆和 Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health(CINAHL)数据库进一步搜索文献。该范围综述还将考虑定量、定性和混合研究方法、文本和观点文件;综述研究;和试点测试。选择的研究将首先根据 Joanna Briggs 研究所的范围综述数据提取部分进行提取,以确定其一般特征。将根据电子教科书框架对 DTs 进行分析:信息商品、技术和利益相关者。

伦理和传播

韩国南海大学伦理审查委员会批准本研究豁免审查(批准号:1041478-2022-HR-009)。本研究的结果将通过研究结果传播到护理教育机构和医院。开放科学框架:https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/QS6WH。