Suppr超能文献

门诊白内障手术:发病和手术风险分析不支持当前的临床眼科指南。

Outpatient cataract surgery: incident and procedural risk analysis do not support current clinical ophthalmology guidelines.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology & Resuscitation, St. Elisabeth Hospital, Tilburg, the Netherlands.

Department of Ophthalmology, St. Elisabeth Hospital, Tilburg, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Ophthalmology. 2015 Feb;122(2):281-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.08.030. Epub 2014 Oct 22.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether an ophthalmologist-led, non-anesthesia-supported, limited monitoring pathway for phacoemulsification/intraocular lens cataract surgery, can be performed safely with only a medical emergency team providing support.

DESIGN

Retrospective, observational, cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS

All patients who underwent elective phacoemulsification/intraocular lens surgery under topical anesthesia in the ophthalmology outpatient unit between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2012.

METHODS

Cataract surgery was performed by phacoemulsification under topical anesthesia. The intake process mainly embraced ophthalmic evaluation, obtaining a medical history, and proposing the procedure. A staff ophthalmologist performed the procedure assisted by 2 registered nurses in an independent outpatient clinic operating room within the hospital. The clinical pathway was without dedicated presence of or access to anesthesia service. Perioperative monitoring was limited to blood pressure and plethysmography preoperatively and intraoperatively. Patients were offered supportive care and instructed to avoid fasting and continue all their chronic medication.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measure was the incidence of adverse events requiring medical emergency team (MET) interventions throughout the pathway. Secondary outcome measures were surgical ocular complication rates, use of oral sedatives, and reported reasons to perform the surgery in the classical operation room complex.

RESULTS

Within the cataract pathway, 6961 cases (4347 patients) were eligible for analysis. Three MET interventions related to the phacoemulsification/intraocular lens pathway occurred in the 2-year study period, resulting in an intervention rate of 0.04%. None of the interventions was intraoperative. All 3 patients were diagnosed as vasovagal collapse and recuperated uneventfully. No hospital admittance was required. Eight other incidents occurred within the general ophthalmology outpatient unit population during the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

Cataract surgery can be safely performed in an outpatient clinic, in the absence of the anesthesia service and with limited workup and monitoring. Basic first aid and basic life support skills seem to be sufficient in case of an adverse event. An MET provides a generous failsafe for this low-risk procedure.

摘要

目的

评估在没有麻醉支持、仅由医疗急救团队提供支持的情况下,由眼科医生主导的、针对白内障超声乳化术/人工晶状体白内障手术的非麻醉支持有限监测途径是否安全。

设计

回顾性、观察性、队列研究。

参与者

2011 年 1 月 1 日至 2012 年 12 月 31 日期间,在眼科门诊接受局部麻醉下白内障超声乳化术/人工晶状体手术的所有患者。

方法

在局部麻醉下进行白内障超声乳化术。摄入过程主要包括眼科评估、获取病史和提出手术方案。一名主治眼科医生在医院内的独立门诊手术室由 2 名注册护士协助进行手术。该临床途径没有专职麻醉服务人员在场或可供使用。围手术期监测仅限于术前和术中血压和容积描记术。为患者提供支持性护理,并指导其避免禁食并继续服用所有慢性药物。

主要观察指标

主要观察指标是整个途径中需要医疗急救团队(MET)干预的不良事件的发生率。次要观察指标是手术眼部并发症发生率、口服镇静剂的使用情况以及在经典手术室环境下进行手术的报告原因。

结果

在白内障途径中,6961 例(4347 例患者)符合分析条件。在 2 年的研究期间,发生了 3 例与白内障超声乳化术/人工晶状体途径相关的 MET 干预事件,干预率为 0.04%。无术中干预。所有 3 例患者均被诊断为血管迷走性晕厥,均恢复顺利,无需住院治疗。在研究期间,普通眼科门诊人群中还发生了其他 8 例事件。

结论

在没有麻醉服务、检查和监测有限的情况下,白内障手术可以安全地在门诊进行。在发生不良事件的情况下,基本急救和基本生命支持技能似乎足够。MET 为这一低风险手术提供了慷慨的安全保障。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验