• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

整体的协同作用:构建一个加速药物研发的全球临床试验系统。

The synergy of the whole: building a global system for clinical trials to accelerate medicines development.

作者信息

Koski Greg, Tobin Mary F, Whalen Matthew

机构信息

Alliance for Clinical Research Excellence and Safety, One Broadway, 14th Floor, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Alliance for Clinical Research Excellence and Safety, One Broadway, 14th Floor, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 2014 Oct 1;36(10):1356-70. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.09.006. Epub 2014 Oct 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.09.006
PMID:25444565
Abstract

PURPOSE

The pharmaceutical industry, once highly respected, productive, and profitable, is in the throes of major change driven by many forces, including economics, science, regulation, and ethics. A variety of initiatives and partnerships have been launched to improve efficiency and productivity but without significant effect because they have failed to consider the process as a system.

METHODS

Addressing the challenges facing this complex endeavor requires more than modifications of individual processes; it requires a fully integrated application of systems thinking and an understanding of the desired goals and complex interactions among essential components and stakeholders of the whole. A multistakeholder collaborative effort, led by the Alliance for Clinical Research Excellence and Safety (ACRES), a global nonprofit organization operating in the public interest, is now under way to build a shared global system for clinical research. Its systems approach focuses on the interconnection of stakeholders at critical points of interaction within 4 operational domains: site development and support, quality management, information technology, and safety. The ACRES initiatives, Site Accreditation and Standards, Product Safety Culture, Global Ethical Review and Regulatory Innovation, and Quality Assurance and Safety, focus on building and implementing systems solutions. Underpinning these initiatives is an open, shared, integrated technology (site and optics and quality informatics initiative).

FINDINGS

We describe the rationale, challenges, progress, and successes of this effort to date and lessons learned. The complexity and fragmentation of the intensely proprietary ecosystem of drug development, challenging regulatory climate, and magnitude of the endeavor itself pose significant challenges, but the economic, social, and scientific rewards will more than justify the effort.

IMPLICATIONS

An effective alliance model requires a willingness of multiple stakeholders to work together to build a shared system within a noncompetitive space that will have major benefits for all, including better access to medicines, better health, and more productive lives.

摘要

目的

制药行业曾备受尊重、富有成效且利润丰厚,如今却因经济、科学、监管和伦理等诸多因素的驱动而处于重大变革的阵痛之中。为提高效率和生产力已发起了各种举措和合作,但未取得显著成效,因为它们未能将该过程视为一个系统。

方法

应对这一复杂工作所面临的挑战,需要的不仅仅是对个别流程的修改;它需要全面综合地应用系统思维,并理解整个系统的期望目标以及基本组成部分和利益相关者之间的复杂相互作用。由卓越临床研究与安全联盟(ACRES)牵头的多方利益相关者合作努力正在进行中,ACRES是一家以公共利益为导向运营的全球非营利组织,旨在构建一个共享的全球临床研究系统。其系统方法侧重于在四个运营领域(机构开发与支持、质量管理、信息技术和安全)的关键互动点上利益相关者的相互联系。ACRES的举措,即机构认证与标准、产品安全文化、全球伦理审查与监管创新以及质量保证与安全,专注于构建和实施系统解决方案。支撑这些举措的是一个开放、共享、集成的技术(机构与光学及质量信息学计划)。

研究结果

我们描述了迄今为止这项工作的基本原理、挑战、进展、成功之处以及经验教训。药物开发高度专有化的生态系统的复杂性和碎片化、具有挑战性的监管环境以及这项工作本身的规模带来了重大挑战,但经济、社会和科学回报将充分证明付出的努力是值得的。

启示

一个有效的联盟模式要求多个利益相关者愿意共同努力,在一个非竞争性的空间内构建一个共享系统,这将为所有人带来重大利益,包括更好地获取药品、改善健康状况以及提高生活生产力。

相似文献

1
The synergy of the whole: building a global system for clinical trials to accelerate medicines development.整体的协同作用:构建一个加速药物研发的全球临床试验系统。
Clin Ther. 2014 Oct 1;36(10):1356-70. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.09.006. Epub 2014 Oct 23.
2
Culture of Care: Organizational Responsibilities关怀文化:组织职责
3
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.美国临床肿瘤学会政策声明:临床研究监督
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2377-86. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.026. Epub 2003 Apr 29.
4
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
5
Towards a European strategy for medicines research (2014-2020): The EUFEPS position paper on Horizon 2020.迈向欧洲药品研究战略(2014-2020 年):欧盟制药工业协会联合会关于“地平线 2020”计划的立场文件。
Eur J Pharm Sci. 2012 Dec 18;47(5):979-87. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2012.09.020. Epub 2012 Oct 6.
6
Melding regulatory, pharmaceutical industry, and U.S. payer perspectives on improving approaches to heterogeneity of treatment effect in research and practice.融合监管、制药行业和美国支付方视角,探讨改善研究和实践中治疗效果异质性方法。
Value Health. 2013 Sep-Oct;16(6 Suppl):S10-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.06.006.
7
Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.德国药品效益评估的程序和方法。
Eur J Health Econ. 2008 Nov;9 Suppl 1:5-29. doi: 10.1007/s10198-008-0122-5.
8
The project data sphere initiative: accelerating cancer research by sharing data.项目数据领域计划:通过数据共享加速癌症研究
Oncologist. 2015 May;20(5):464-e20. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0431. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
9
Challenges to pharmaceutical policymaking: lessons from Australia's national medicines policy.制药政策制定面临的挑战:来自澳大利亚国家药品政策的经验教训。
Aust Health Rev. 2014 May;38(2):160-8. doi: 10.1071/AH13240.
10
Twenty-five years of addressing cutting-edge scientific, policy, and regulatory issues through collaboration: The Forum for Collaborative Research.通过合作解决前沿科学、政策和监管问题的 25 年:合作研究论坛。
Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Oct;17(10):e70051. doi: 10.1111/cts.70051.

引用本文的文献

1
A systematic literature review to identify ethical, legal, and social responsibilities of nonprofit organizations when funding clinical trials in pediatric cancer.系统文献回顾,以确定非营利组织在资助儿科癌症临床试验时的伦理、法律和社会责任。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2022 Sep;69(9):e29854. doi: 10.1002/pbc.29854. Epub 2022 Jun 27.