• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

磁共振成像前列腺癌假阳性的相关因素及临床意义。

False-positive magnetic resonance imaging prostate cancer correlates and clinical implications.

作者信息

Arafa Mostafa A, Rabah Danny M, Khan Farrukh, Farhat Karim Hamda, Ibrahim Nahla Khamis, Albekairi Alanoud A

机构信息

The Cancer Research Chair, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Department of Epidemiology, High Institute of Public Health, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.

出版信息

Urol Ann. 2023 Jan-Mar;15(1):54-59. doi: 10.4103/ua.ua_22_22. Epub 2022 Nov 8.

DOI:10.4103/ua.ua_22_22
PMID:37006206
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10062519/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

False-positive (FP) multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MPMRI) obscures and swift needless biopsies in men with a high prostate-specific antigen.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective study, in which all patients who had been exposed to consecutive MP-MRI of the prostate combined with transrectal ultrasound-guided-magnetic resonance imaging fusion-guided prostate biopsy between 2017 and 2020 were involved in the study. The FP was measured as the number of biopsies that did not encompass prostate cancer divided by the whole number of biopsies.

RESULTS

The percentage of FP cases was 51.1%, the highest percentage was found in Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADs) 3 (37.7%) and the lowest was detected in PI-RAD 5 (14.5%). Those with FP biopsies are younger, and their total prostate antigen (PSA) and PSA density (PSAD) are significantly lesser. The area under the curve PSAD, age, and total PSA are 0.76, 0.74, and 0.69, respectively. An optimum PSAD value of 0.135 was chosen as a cutoff because it showed the highest sum of sensitivity and specificity, 68% and 69%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

FP results of mpMRI were detected in more than half of our sample, more than one-third were presented in Pi-RAD3, improved imaging techniques to decrease FP rates are highly needed.

摘要

背景

在前列腺特异性抗原水平较高的男性中,多参数磁共振成像(MPMRI)的假阳性(FP)结果会导致不必要的活检并掩盖病情。

材料与方法

这是一项回顾性研究,纳入了2017年至2020年间接受连续前列腺MP-MRI检查并结合经直肠超声引导-磁共振成像融合引导前列腺活检的所有患者。FP的计算方法为未发现前列腺癌的活检次数除以活检总次数。

结果

FP病例的百分比为51.1%,在前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADs)3中发现的百分比最高(37.7%),在PI-RAD 5中最低(14.5%)。接受FP活检的患者更年轻,其总前列腺抗原(PSA)和PSA密度(PSAD)显著更低。PSAD、年龄和总PSA的曲线下面积分别为0.76、0.74和0.69。选择最佳PSAD值0.135作为临界值,因为它显示出最高的敏感性和特异性之和,分别为68%和69%。

结论

在我们的样本中,超过一半的mpMRI结果为FP,超过三分之一出现在Pi-RAD3中,因此迫切需要改进成像技术以降低FP率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aebe/10062519/12af2826aeab/UA-15-54-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aebe/10062519/cdc61fae107e/UA-15-54-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aebe/10062519/12af2826aeab/UA-15-54-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aebe/10062519/cdc61fae107e/UA-15-54-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aebe/10062519/12af2826aeab/UA-15-54-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
False-positive magnetic resonance imaging prostate cancer correlates and clinical implications.磁共振成像前列腺癌假阳性的相关因素及临床意义。
Urol Ann. 2023 Jan-Mar;15(1):54-59. doi: 10.4103/ua.ua_22_22. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
2
How to make clinical decisions to avoid unnecessary prostate screening in biopsy-naïve men with PI-RADs v2 score ≤ 3?如何在 PI-RADS v2 评分≤3 的初次活检无前列腺癌的男性中做出临床决策以避免不必要的前列腺筛查?
Int J Clin Oncol. 2020 Jan;25(1):175-186. doi: 10.1007/s10147-019-01524-9. Epub 2019 Aug 31.
3
The Use of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Follow-up of Patients Included in Active Surveillance Protocol. Can PSA Density Discriminate Patients at Different Risk of Reclassification?多参数磁共振成像在主动监测方案纳入患者随访中的应用。PSA 密度能否区分不同再分类风险的患者?
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2020 Dec;18(6):e698-e704. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2020.04.006. Epub 2020 May 4.
4
MRI combined with PSA density in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with PSA serum levels of 4∼10ng/mL: Biparametric versus multiparametric MRI.MRI 联合 PSA 密度在检测 PSA 血清水平为 4∼10ng/mL 的患者中具有临床意义的前列腺癌:双参数与多参数 MRI。
Diagn Interv Imaging. 2020 Apr;101(4):235-244. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2020.01.014. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
5
Added Value of Prostate-specific Antigen Density in Selecting Prostate Biopsy Candidates Among Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen and PI-RADS ≥3 Lesions on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate: A Systematic Assessment by PI-RADS Score.在前列腺特异性抗原和 PI-RADS≥3 病变的前列腺多参数磁共振成像中前列腺特异性抗原升高的男性中选择前列腺活检候选者时前列腺特异性抗原密度的附加价值:按 PI-RADS 评分进行系统评估。
Eur Urol Focus. 2024 Jul;10(4):634-640. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.10.006. Epub 2023 Oct 19.
6
The Value of Prostate-specific Antigen Density for Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System 3 Lesions on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Strategy to Avoid Unnecessary Prostate Biopsies.前列腺特异性抗原密度对多参数磁共振成像上前列腺影像报告和数据系统3类病变的价值:一种避免不必要前列腺活检的策略
Eur Urol Focus. 2021 Mar;7(2):325-331. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2019.11.012. Epub 2019 Dec 12.
7
Clinical utility of MR/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy in patients with lower suspicion lesions on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer.MR/超声融合引导活检在低危前列腺癌主动监测中对低可疑病变患者的临床应用价值。
Urol Oncol. 2022 Sep;40(9):407.e21-407.e27. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.06.005. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
8
The role of mpMRI and PSA density in patients with an initial negative prostatic biopsy.在初次前列腺活检阴性的患者中,mpMRI 和 PSA 密度的作用。
World J Urol. 2018 Dec;36(12):2021-2025. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2341-4. Epub 2018 May 28.
9
Value of 3-Tesla multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and targeted biopsy for improved risk stratification in patients considered for active surveillance.3特斯拉多参数磁共振成像及靶向活检在考虑进行主动监测的患者中改善风险分层的价值
BJU Int. 2017 Apr;119(4):535-542. doi: 10.1111/bju.13624. Epub 2016 Sep 3.
10
Multivariable stratification of PI-RADS version 2.1 categories for the risk of false-positive target biopsy: Impact on prostate biopsy decisions.PI-RADS 版本 2.1 各分类的多变量分层对靶向活检假阳性风险的影响:对前列腺活检决策的影响。
Eur J Radiol. 2023 Aug;165:110897. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110897. Epub 2023 May 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Supervised contrastive loss helps uncover more robust features for photoacoustic prostate cancer identification.监督对比损失有助于揭示更强大的特征用于光声前列腺癌识别。
Front Oncol. 2025 Jul 9;15:1592815. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1592815. eCollection 2025.
2
Prediction of prostate biopsy outcomes at different cut-offs of prostate-specific antigen using machine learning: a multicenter study.利用机器学习预测不同前列腺特异性抗原临界值下的前列腺活检结果:一项多中心研究。
J Egypt Natl Canc Inst. 2025 Mar 17;37(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s43046-025-00265-3.
3
Clinical and Imaging Predictors of False-Positive and False-Negative Results in Prostate Multiparametric MRI Using PI-RADS Version 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical utility of PSAD combined with PI-RADS category for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.前列腺特异抗原密度(PSAD)联合前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)分类在检测临床显著性前列腺癌中的临床应用
Urol Oncol. 2020 Nov;38(11):846.e9-846.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.05.024. Epub 2020 Jun 21.
2
Delivering Clinical impacts of the MRI diagnostic pathway in prostate cancer diagnosis.实现 MRI 诊断途径在前列腺癌诊断中的临床影响。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2020 Dec;45(12):4012-4022. doi: 10.1007/s00261-020-02547-x.
3
Analysis of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-directed Biopsy Strategies for Changing the Paradigm of Prostate Cancer Diagnosis.
使用PI-RADS第2版的前列腺多参数MRI中假阳性和假阴性结果的临床及影像预测因素
Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2025 Mar;7(2):e240019. doi: 10.1148/rycan.240019.
4
Toward confident prostate cancer detection using ultrasound: a multi-center study.利用超声进行自信的前列腺癌检测:一项多中心研究。
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2024 May;19(5):841-849. doi: 10.1007/s11548-024-03119-w. Epub 2024 May 5.
5
Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Study in the mpMRI of the Prostate-Unnecessary or Underutilised? A Narrative Review.前列腺磁共振成像中的动态对比增强研究——是否不必要或未得到充分利用?一项叙述性综述。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Nov 20;13(22):3488. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13223488.
磁共振成像引导下的活检策略分析:改变前列腺癌诊断模式。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2020 Feb;3(1):32-41. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2019.10.001. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
4
Inflammation appears as high Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System scores on prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) leading to false positive MRI fusion biopsy.炎症在前列腺磁共振成像(MRI)上表现为高前列腺影像报告和数据系统评分,导致 MRI 融合活检出现假阳性。
Investig Clin Urol. 2019 Sep;60(5):388-395. doi: 10.4111/icu.2019.60.5.388. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
5
Comparison of Targeted vs Systematic Prostate Biopsy in Men Who Are Biopsy Naive: The Prospective Assessment of Image Registration in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer (PAIREDCAP) Study.靶向与系统前列腺活检在初次活检的男性中的比较:前列腺癌的图像配准前瞻性评估(PAIREDCAP)研究。
JAMA Surg. 2019 Sep 1;154(9):811-818. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.1734.
6
Prostate MRI, with or without MRI-targeted biopsy, and systematic biopsy for detecting prostate cancer.用于检测前列腺癌的前列腺磁共振成像(MRI),无论是否进行MRI靶向活检及系统活检。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Apr 25;4(4):CD012663. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012663.pub2.
7
False positives in PIRADS (V2) 3, 4, and 5 lesions: relationship with reader experience and zonal location.PI-RADS(版本 2)3、4、5 级病变中的假阳性:与读者经验和区域位置的关系。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019 Mar;44(3):1044-1051. doi: 10.1007/s00261-019-01919-2.
8
Accuracy and Variability of Prostate Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Interpretation Using the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System: A Blinded Comparison of Radiologists.使用前列腺影像报告和数据系统解读前列腺多参数磁共振成像的准确性和变异性:放射科医生的盲法比较
Eur Urol Focus. 2020 Mar 15;6(2):267-272. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2018.10.008. Epub 2018 Oct 14.
9
Pitfalls in interpreting positive and negative predictive values: Application to prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.解读阳性和阴性预测值时的陷阱:在前列腺多参数磁共振成像中的应用
Diagn Interv Imaging. 2018 Sep;99(9):515-518. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2018.07.008. Epub 2018 Aug 31.
10
MRI-Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Biopsy of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 Category 5 Lesions Found False-Positive at Multiparametric Prostate MRI.多参数前列腺 MRI 发现前列腺影像报告和数据系统版本 2 类别 5 病变的 MRI-超声融合靶向活检为假阳性。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 May;210(5):W218-W225. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.18680. Epub 2018 Feb 28.