Cocker P J, Winstanley C A
Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Behav Brain Res. 2015 Feb 15;279:259-73. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.10.043. Epub 2014 Nov 4.
Gambling is a heterogeneous and complex disorder. Multiple factors may lead to problem gambling, yet one of the most important appears to be the increased presence of cognitive biases or distortions. These biases are thought to precipitate gambling as they can lead to dysfunctional decision making under risk or ambiguity. Modelling these cognitive perturbations in animals can improve our understanding of their neurobiological bases, and potentially stimulate novel treatment options. The first aim of this review is to give a broad overview of some of the cognitive biases that are most commonly associated with gambling. Secondly, we will discuss several animal models that we have developed in which rodent decision-making appears hallmarked by the same cognitive inconsistencies as human choice. In particular, we will discuss two tasks that capture elements of risk and loss averse decision making, and another in which rats appear susceptible to the 'near-miss' effect. To date, findings from both human and non-human studies suggest that these different biases are neuropharmacologically and neurostructurally dissociable, and that dopamine plays a key role in their expression. Lastly, we will briefly discuss areas in both human and animal research where limitations within the field may be hampering a more complete understanding of pathological gambling as a disorder.
赌博是一种异质性且复杂的障碍。多种因素可能导致问题赌博,但其中最重要的因素之一似乎是认知偏差或扭曲现象的增多。这些偏差被认为会促使赌博行为的发生,因为它们会导致在风险或不确定性情况下做出功能失调的决策。在动物身上模拟这些认知扰动可以增进我们对其神经生物学基础的理解,并有可能催生出新的治疗方案。本综述的首要目的是对一些与赌博最常相关的认知偏差进行广泛概述。其次,我们将讨论我们所开发的几种动物模型,在这些模型中,啮齿动物的决策表现出与人类选择相同的认知不一致特征。特别地,我们将讨论两项捕捉风险和损失厌恶决策要素的任务,以及另一项大鼠似乎易受“差点赢”效应影响的任务。迄今为止,来自人类和非人类研究的结果表明,这些不同的偏差在神经药理学和神经结构上是可分离的,并且多巴胺在它们的表现中起着关键作用。最后,我们将简要讨论人类和动物研究领域中,该领域内的局限性可能阻碍对病理性赌博作为一种障碍进行更全面理解的方面。