Suppr超能文献

赌博态度和信念调查的维度结构:对赌博特定认知扭曲的单一维度假设的挑战。

The Dimensional Structure of the Gambling Attitudes and Beliefs Survey: Challenging the Assumption of the Unidimensionality of Gambling-Specific Cognitive Distortions.

机构信息

University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

J Gambl Stud. 2023 Mar;39(1):75-86. doi: 10.1007/s10899-022-10133-7. Epub 2022 May 28.

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to examine the dimensional structure of the Gambling Attitudes and Beliefs Survey (GABS). The GABS was administered to a sample of 415 individuals with self-reported problem or pathological gambling who were taking part in two different treatment studies preregistered with the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00013888) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03372226). Exploratory factor analyses revealed a three-factor structure. We labeled the factors sensation seeking/illusion of control, luck/gambler's fallacy, and attitude/emotions. Subsequent confirmatory factor analyses proved the three-factor model superior to the one-factor model proposed by the developers of the GABS. All dimensions were significantly correlated with symptom severity scores. Group comparisons showed significantly higher factor scores on the first factor (sensation seeking/illusion of control) for individuals reporting both skill-based and chance-based gambling compared to those reporting only chance-based gambling. The present study questions the unidimensionality of the GABS. A multidimensional assessment of gambling-related cognitive biases, beliefs, and positively valued attitudes may be useful in determining treatment outcomes and goals and in the development of novel interventions.

摘要

本研究旨在检验赌博态度和信念调查(GABS)的维度结构。GABS 被施测于 415 名自我报告有问题或病态赌博的个体,他们参加了在德国临床试验注册处(DRKS00013888)和 ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT03372226)预先注册的两项不同的治疗研究。探索性因素分析显示出三因素结构。我们将这些因素标记为寻求刺激/控制错觉、运气/赌徒谬误和态度/情绪。随后的验证性因素分析证明,三因素模型优于 GABS 开发者提出的单因素模型。所有维度与症状严重程度评分显著相关。组间比较显示,报告既有基于技能的赌博又有基于机会的赌博的个体在报告第一个因素(寻求刺激/控制错觉)的因子得分明显更高,而仅报告基于机会的赌博的个体得分则较低。本研究对 GABS 的单维性提出了质疑。对与赌博相关的认知偏差、信念和正面价值态度进行多维评估,可能有助于确定治疗结果和目标,并开发新的干预措施。

相似文献

3
Cognitive psychopathology of problem gambling.问题赌博的认知精神病理学
Subst Use Misuse. 1999 Sep;34(11):1593-604. doi: 10.3109/10826089909039417.
5
An Assessment of the Validity of the Gamblers Belief Questionnaire. gamblers belief questionnaire 有效性评估
Addict Behav. 2019 Oct;97:104-110. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.05.029. Epub 2019 May 31.
8
Cognitive distortions among older adult gamblers in an Asian context.亚洲背景下老年赌徒的认知扭曲。
PLoS One. 2017 May 18;12(5):e0178036. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178036. eCollection 2017.

本文引用的文献

3
Chi-square for model fit in confirmatory factor analysis.验证性因素分析中模型拟合的卡方检验。
J Adv Nurs. 2020 Sep;76(9):2209-2211. doi: 10.1111/jan.14399. Epub 2020 May 7.
7
Is subclinical gambling really subclinical?亚临床赌博真的是亚临床的吗?
Addict Behav. 2017 Oct;73:185-191. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.05.014. Epub 2017 May 15.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验