Kirchhoff Alison Luís, Fariniuk Luiz Fernando, Mello Isabel
Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
Department of Dental Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada; Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitboa, Canada.
J Endod. 2015 Feb;41(2):237-41. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.09.023. Epub 2014 Nov 4.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the amount of apically extruded debris in flat-oval root canal systems during cleaning and shaping with different instrumentation systems.
Seventy-two mandibular incisors were randomly assigned to 4 groups (n = 18) according to the instrumentation system to be used: the ProTaper Next rotary system (PTN; Dentsply Tulsa Dental, Tulsa, OK), the WaveOne reciprocating system (WO, Dentsply Tulsa Dental), the Twisted File Adaptive (TFA; SybronEndo, Orange, CA) rotary/reciprocating system, and the Self-Adjusting File (SAF) system (ReDent-Nova, Ra'anana, Israel). Debris extruded during the instrumentation was collected and dried in preweighed Eppendorf tubes. Three consecutive weights were obtained for each tube, and the average was calculated. The data were analyzed using the t test and analysis of variance (Games-Howell test).
The SAF produced significantly more debris compared with the other systems (P < .05). No significant difference was noted amongst the PTN, WO, and TFA (P > .05).
Regardless of the instrumentation system used, apical extrusion of debris was exhibited at some level, regardless of the instrumentation system used. The SAF was associated with the highest amount of debris extrusion compared with PTN, WO, and TFA.
本研究的目的是评估在使用不同器械系统进行根管清理和预备时,扁平椭圆形根管系统中根尖部挤出碎屑的量。
根据所使用的器械系统,将72颗下颌切牙随机分为4组(每组n = 18):ProTaper Next旋转系统(PTN;登士柏 Tulsa Dental,塔尔萨,俄克拉荷马州)、WaveOne往复系统(WO,登士柏 Tulsa Dental)、Twisted File Adaptive(TFA;SybronEndo,奥兰治,加利福尼亚州)旋转/往复系统和自调式锉(SAF)系统(ReDent-Nova,拉阿南纳,以色列)。在器械操作过程中挤出的碎屑收集在预先称重的Eppendorf管中并干燥。每个管获得连续三个重量,并计算平均值。使用t检验和方差分析(Games-Howell检验)对数据进行分析。
与其他系统相比,SAF产生的碎屑明显更多(P < .05)。PTN、WO和TFA之间未观察到显著差异(P > .05)。
无论使用何种器械系统,在一定程度上都会出现碎屑的根尖挤出。与PTN、WO和TFA相比,SAF与最高量的碎屑挤出相关。