Suppr超能文献

评价几种镍钛系统根管内器械分离的情况。

Evaluation of apically extruded debris associated with several Ni-Ti systems.

机构信息

Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey.

Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Trakya University, Edirne, Turkey.

出版信息

Int Endod J. 2015 Jul;48(7):701-4. doi: 10.1111/iej.12369. Epub 2014 Sep 16.

Abstract

AIM

To evaluate the apical extrusion of debris associated with several root canal preparation systems in vitro.

METHODOLOGY

Forty-five extracted human mandibular premolars with single canals and similar lengths were used. The root canals were instrumented using ProTaper Next (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland), Twisted File (SybronEndo, Orange, CA, USA) or WaveOne (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland). Debris extruded apically during instrumentation was collected into pre-weighed Eppendorf tubes. The Eppendorf tubes were then stored in an incubator at 70 °C for 5 days. The Eppendorf tubes were weighed to obtain the final weight of the Eppendorf tubes plus extruded debris. Three consecutive weights were obtained for each tube. The groups were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance on Ranks and Tukey's test.

RESULTS

The ProTaper Next group produced the highest mean extrusion value whilst WaveOne produced less debris compared with all the other instruments (P > 0.05). There was a significant difference between the ProTaper Next and WaveOne group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Apically extruded debris was associated with all instrumentation techniques. The WaveOne system extruded less debris compared with the Twisted File and ProTaper Next.

摘要

目的

评估几种根管预备系统在体外产生的根管玷污层的根尖挤出量。

方法

本研究使用 45 颗具有单根管且根管长度相似的下颌前磨牙。使用 Protaper Next(登士柏,瑞士)、Twisted File(登士柏,瑞士)或 WaveOne(登士柏,瑞士)对根管进行预备。将器械预备过程中根尖挤出的玷污层收集到预称重的 Eppendorf 管中。然后将 Eppendorf 管在 70°C 的孵育箱中放置 5 天。称重 Eppendorf 管以获得 Eppendorf 管加挤出的玷污层的最终重量。每个管重复进行三次称重。使用基于秩次的 Kruskal-Wallis 单向方差分析和 Tukey 检验对各组进行比较。

结果

ProTaper Next 组产生的平均挤出量最高,而 WaveOne 组与所有其他器械相比产生的玷污层较少(P > 0.05)。ProTaper Next 组和 WaveOne 组之间有显著差异(P < 0.05)。

结论

所有器械预备技术均与根尖挤出的玷污层有关。与 Twisted File 和 ProTaper Next 相比,WaveOne 系统产生的玷污层较少。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验