On "Identifying items to assess methodological quality…" Armio-Olivo A, Cummings GC, Fuentes J, et al. Phys Ther. 2014;94:1272-1284.
作者信息
Maher Christopher G, Elkins Mark R, Herbert Robert D, Moseley Anne M, Sherrington Catherine, Kamper Steven J
机构信息
C.G. Maher, PT, PhD, The George Institute for Global Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
M.R. Elkins, PhD, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, The University of Sydney.
出版信息
Phys Ther. 2014 Dec;94(12):1826. doi: 10.2522/ptj.2014.94.12.1826.1.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
On "Identifying items to assess methodological quality…" Armio-Olivo A, Cummings GC, Fuentes J, et al. Phys Ther. 2014;94:1272-1284.关于“识别评估方法学质量的项目……” 阿尔米奥 - 奥利沃A、卡明斯GC、富恩特斯J等。《物理治疗》。2014年；94卷：1272 - 1284页。
Phys Ther. 2014 Dec;94(12):1826. doi: 10.2522/ptj.2014.94.12.1826.1.
2
Identifying items to assess methodological quality in physical therapy trials: a factor analysis.识别评估物理治疗试验方法学质量的项目：一项因子分析。
Phys Ther. 2014 Sep;94(9):1272-84. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20130464. Epub 2014 May 1.
3
Author response.作者回复。
Phys Ther. 2014 Dec;94(12):1826-8. doi: 10.2522/ptj.2014.94.12.1826.2.
4
On "A guide to interpretation of studies..." Hancock M, et al. Phys Ther. 2009;89:698-704.关于《研究解读指南……》 汉考克 M 等人。《物理治疗》。2009 年；89:698 - 704。
Phys Ther. 2009 Oct;89(10):1098-9; author reply 1099-1100. doi: 10.2522/ptj.2009.89.10.1098.
5
Methodological Quality of Motor Intervention Randomized Controlled Trials in Stroke Rehabilitation.中风康复中运动干预随机对照试验的方法学质量
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016 Feb;25(2):248-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2015.09.024. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
6
Quality of reporting in randomized trials.随机试验中的报告质量。
Ear Nose Throat J. 2010 Apr;89(4):150.
7
Trend in methodological quality of randomised clinical trials in low back pain.腰痛随机临床试验的方法学质量趋势
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2005 Aug;19(4):529-39. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2005.02.001.
8
Fables or foibles: inherent problems with RCTs.寓言还是弱点：随机对照试验的内在问题
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2003 Sep;26(7):460-7. doi: 10.1016/S0161-4754(03)00094-0.
9
Methodological changes in the evaluation of complementary and alternative medicine: issues raised by Sherman et al. and Hawk et al.补充与替代医学评估中的方法学变革：谢尔曼等人及霍克等人提出的问题
J Altern Complement Med. 2002 Feb;8(1):5-6. doi: 10.1089/107555302753507113.
10
Randomization: Linking Evidence to Practice.随机化：将证据与实践联系起来。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2018 Sep;48(9):730-731. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2018.0704.
Zotero 插件