• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新型手术(联合肝脏分割和门静脉结扎的分期肝切除术)可行性、安全性及疗效的系统评价与Meta分析

Systematic review and meta-analysis of feasibility, safety, and efficacy of a novel procedure: associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy.

作者信息

Schadde Erik, Schnitzbauer Andreas A, Tschuor Christoph, Raptis Dimitri A, Bechstein Wolf O, Clavien Pierre-Alain

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Swiss HPB and Transplant Center, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Sep;22(9):3109-20. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-4213-5. Epub 2014 Dec 2.

DOI:10.1245/s10434-014-4213-5
PMID:25448799
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) is a novel strategy to resect liver tumors despite the small size of the liver remnant. It is an hepatectomy in two stages, with PVL and parenchymal transection during the first stage, which induces rapid growth of the remnant liver exceeding any other technique. Despite high postoperative morbidity and mortality in most reports, the technique was adopted by a number of surgeons.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This systematic review explores current data regarding the feasibility, safety, and oncologic efficacy of ALPPS; the search strategy has been published online. A meta-analysis of hypertrophy, feasibility (ALPPS stage 2 performed), mortality, complications, and R0 (complete) resection was performed.

RESULTS

A literature search revealed a total of 13 publications that met the search criteria, reporting data from 295 patients. Evidence levels were low, with the highest Oxford evidence level being 2c. The most common indication was colorectal liver metastasis in 203 patients. Hypertrophy in the meta-analysis was 84 %, feasibility (ALPPS stage 2 performed) 97 % (CI 94-99 %), 90-day mortality 11 % (CI 8-16 %), and complications grade IIIa or higher occured in 44 % (CI 38-50 %) of patients. A standardized reporting format for complications is lacking despite the widespread use of the Clavien-Dindo classification. Oncological outcome is not well-documented. The most common topics in the selected studies published were technical feasibility and indications for the procedures. Publication bias due to case-series and single-center reports is common.

CONCLUSION

A systematic exploration of this novel operation with a rigid methodology, such as registry analyses and a randomized controlled trial, is highly advised.

摘要

背景

联合肝脏分隔和门静脉结扎的分期肝切除术(ALPPS)是一种用于切除肝肿瘤的新策略,尽管剩余肝脏体积较小。这是一种分两阶段进行的肝切除术,第一阶段进行门静脉结扎和实质离断,可促使剩余肝脏快速生长,超过其他任何技术。尽管大多数报告显示术后发病率和死亡率较高,但该技术仍被许多外科医生采用。

材料与方法

本系统评价探讨了关于ALPPS可行性、安全性和肿瘤学疗效的现有数据;检索策略已在线发表。对肝脏肥大、可行性(完成ALPPS第二阶段手术)、死亡率、并发症和R0(根治性)切除进行了荟萃分析。

结果

文献检索共发现13篇符合检索标准的出版物,报告了295例患者的数据。证据级别较低,最高牛津证据级别为2c。最常见的适应证是203例患者的结直肠癌肝转移。荟萃分析中肝脏肥大率为84%,可行性(完成ALPPS第二阶段手术)为97%(94%-99%可信区间),90天死亡率为11%(8%-16%可信区间),44%(38%-50%可信区间)的患者出现Ⅲa级或更高等级的并发症。尽管Clavien-Dindo分类法被广泛使用,但仍缺乏并发症的标准化报告格式。肿瘤学结局记录不完善。所选已发表研究中最常见的主题是手术的技术可行性和适应证。病例系列和单中心报告导致的发表偏倚很常见。

结论

强烈建议采用严格的方法对这种新手术进行系统探索,如注册分析和随机对照试验。

相似文献

1
Systematic review and meta-analysis of feasibility, safety, and efficacy of a novel procedure: associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy.新型手术(联合肝脏分割和门静脉结扎的分期肝切除术)可行性、安全性及疗效的系统评价与Meta分析
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Sep;22(9):3109-20. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-4213-5. Epub 2014 Dec 2.
2
Efficacy and safety of different options for liver regeneration of future liver remnant in patients with liver malignancies: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.不同方案促进肝脏恶性肿瘤患者剩余肝再生的疗效和安全性的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2022 Dec 16;20(1):399. doi: 10.1186/s12957-022-02867-w.
3
Simultaneous portal and hepatic vein embolization is better than portal embolization or ALPPS for hypertrophy of future liver remnant before major hepatectomy: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.同期门静脉和肝静脉栓塞术优于门静脉栓塞术或 ALPPS 用于大肝切除术前未来肝残存量的代偿性增生:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2023 Jun;22(3):221-227. doi: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2022.08.013. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
4
No difference in mortality among ALPPS, two-staged hepatectomy, and portal vein embolization/ligation: A systematic review by updated traditional and network meta-analyses.ALPPS、两阶段肝切除术和门静脉栓塞/结扎术在死亡率方面无差异:通过更新的传统和网状荟萃分析进行的系统评价
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2020 Oct;19(5):411-419. doi: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2020.07.005. Epub 2020 Jul 25.
5
Operative Results and Oncologic Outcomes of Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy (ALPPS) Versus Two-Stage Hepatectomy (TSH) in Patients with Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.不可切除的结直肠癌肝转移患者行联合肝脏分隔和门静脉结扎的分期肝切除术(ALPPS)与两阶段肝切除术(TSH)的手术结果及肿瘤学结局:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
World J Surg. 2018 Mar;42(3):806-815. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4181-6.
6
A systematic review and meta-analysis of feasibility, safety and efficacy of associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) versus two-stage hepatectomy (TSH).肝实质分隔联合门静脉结扎分期肝切除术(ALPPS)与两阶段肝切除术(TSH)的可行性、安全性及疗效的系统评价和荟萃分析
Biosci Trends. 2015 Oct;9(5):284-8. doi: 10.5582/bst.2015.01139.
7
An updated systematic review of the evolution of ALPPS and evaluation of its advantages and disadvantages in accordance with current evidence.根据当前证据对联合肝脏分割和门静脉结扎的分期肝切除术(ALPPS)的演变及其优缺点进行的最新系统评价。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Jun;95(24):e3941. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003941.
8
Variations and adaptations of associated liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS): Many routes to the summit.联合肝脏分隔和门静脉结扎分期肝切除术(ALPPS)的变异与改良:通向顶峰的多条路径
Surgery. 2016 Apr;159(4):1058-72. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.11.013. Epub 2015 Dec 31.
9
ALPPS: challenging the concept of unresectability--a systematic review.ALPPS:挑战不可切除性概念——系统评价。
Int J Surg. 2015 Jan;13:280-287. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.12.008. Epub 2014 Dec 11.
10
A systematic review and meta-analysis of portal vein ligation versus portal vein embolization for elective liver resection.门静脉结扎术与门静脉栓塞术用于择期肝切除术的系统评价和荟萃分析
Surgery. 2015 Apr;157(4):690-8. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2014.12.009. Epub 2015 Feb 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Liver hypertrophy techniques: a position paper from the Italian Group of Regenerative and Occlusive Worldwide-used techniques of hepatic Hypertrophy (I GROWtoH).肝脏肥大技术:来自意大利全球肝脏肥大再生与闭塞常用技术小组(I GROWtoH)的立场文件。
Updates Surg. 2025 Aug 26. doi: 10.1007/s13304-025-02364-1.
2
Prognostic Factors in Colorectal Liver Metastases: An Exhaustive Review of the Literature and Future Prospectives.结直肠癌肝转移的预后因素:文献综述及未来展望
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jul 31;17(15):2539. doi: 10.3390/cancers17152539.
3
Liver venous deprivation (LVD) before extended hepatectomy: a French multicentric retrospective cohort.
扩大肝切除术前的肝静脉剥夺(LVD):一项法国多中心回顾性队列研究
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2024 Dec 1;13(6):937-949. doi: 10.21037/hbsn-24-315. Epub 2024 Nov 5.
4
Comprehensive Review of Future Liver Remnant (FLR) Assessment and Hypertrophy Techniques Before Major Hepatectomy: How to Assess and Manage the FLR.肝大部切除术前未来剩余肝脏(FLR)评估和肝体积增大技术的全面综述:如何评估和管理 FLR。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Dec;31(13):9205-9220. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16108-9. Epub 2024 Sep 4.
5
Overcome intraoperative difficulties of ALPPS procedure: a single-center outcomes and technical experience.克服ALPPS手术的术中困难:单中心结果与技术经验
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024 May 15;86(7):3833-3840. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002161. eCollection 2024 Jul.
6
Application of the IDEAL framework in hepatopancreatobiliary surgery: a review of the literature.IDEAL 框架在肝胆胰外科学中的应用:文献回顾。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Dec 28;409(1):20. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-03211-w.
7
Comparison of clinical efficacy between LAPS and ALPPS in the treatment of hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma.LAPS与ALPPS治疗乙型肝炎病毒相关肝细胞癌的临床疗效比较。
Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2023 Oct 12;11:goad060. doi: 10.1093/gastro/goad060. eCollection 2023.
8
Postoperative Liver Failure: Definitions, Risk factors, Prediction Models and Prevention Strategies.术后肝功能衰竭:定义、危险因素、预测模型和预防策略。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Nov;27(11):2640-2649. doi: 10.1007/s11605-023-05834-2. Epub 2023 Oct 2.
9
Development and validation of a novel risk score to predict overall survival following surgical clearance of bilobar colorectal liver metastases.开发和验证一种新的风险评分模型,以预测双侧结直肠癌肝转移手术后的总生存期。
BJS Open. 2023 Sep 5;7(5). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad085.
10
Risk Factors of Complications from Central Bisectionectomy (H458) for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multi-Institutional Single-Arm Analysis.肝细胞癌中央二分切除术(H458)并发症的危险因素:一项多机构单臂分析
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Mar 13;15(6):1740. doi: 10.3390/cancers15061740.