• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大鼠对二硝基氯苯(DNCB)接触性超敏反应的品系差异

Strain differences in contact hypersensitivity reaction to dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB) in rats.

作者信息

Popov Aleksandrov Aleksandra, Mirkov Ivana, Demenesku Jelena, Ninkov Marina, Zolotarevski Lidija, Kataranovski Dragan, Kataranovski Milena

机构信息

Department of Ecology, Institute for Biological Research "Sinisa Stankovic", University of Belgrade, Bulevar Despota Stefana 142, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.

Institute of Pathology, Military Medical Academy, Crnotravska 17, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.

出版信息

Food Chem Toxicol. 2015 Jan;75:94-103. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2014.11.010. Epub 2014 Nov 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.fct.2014.11.010
PMID:25449201
Abstract

Genetic factors are among the most important determinants of susceptibility to induction of allergic contact dermatitis. A limited number of studies of experimental contact hypersensitivity (CHS) in animals has shown differences in the severity of CHS; however, the underlying mechanisms are unknown. In this study comparative analysis of CHS to low and high dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB) doses regimen of sensitization/challenge in inbred Dark Agouti (DA) and Albino Oxford (AO) rats was examined. Basic aspects of draining lymph node (dLN) activity (cellularity, proliferation), proinflammatory (IFN-γ, IL-17) and anti-inflammatory (IL-10) cytokine gene expression and production, as well as IL-12 and IL-23 subunits mRNA expression, were examined in challenge and sensitization phase of CHS reaction. Lower (compared to DA) intensity of CHS in AO rats was associated with lack of (or negligible) dLN responses in challenge phase (ex vivo, hapten- or IL-2-stimulated cell proliferation and proinflammatory cytokine mRNA and production levels) but with lack of changes in IL-10 response. Less pronounced dLN activity of sensitized animals of this strain was observed as well. Higher proliferative activity and more pronounced proinflammatory cytokine response during challenge and sensitization phase suggest these activities as underlying mechanisms of higher susceptibility of DA rats to CHS response to DNCB.

摘要

遗传因素是诱导过敏性接触性皮炎易感性的最重要决定因素之一。对动物实验性接触性超敏反应(CHS)的有限研究表明,CHS的严重程度存在差异;然而,其潜在机制尚不清楚。在本研究中,对近交系黑豚鼠(DA)和牛津白化大鼠(AO)在低剂量和高剂量二硝基氯苯(DNCB)致敏/激发方案下的CHS进行了比较分析。在CHS反应的激发和致敏阶段,检测了引流淋巴结(dLN)活性(细胞数量、增殖)、促炎(IFN-γ、IL-17)和抗炎(IL-10)细胞因子基因表达和产生,以及IL-12和IL-23亚基mRNA表达的基本情况。AO大鼠中较低的CHS强度(与DA相比)与激发阶段dLN反应缺失(或可忽略不计)相关(体外,半抗原或IL-2刺激的细胞增殖以及促炎细胞因子mRNA和产生水平),但IL-10反应无变化。该品系致敏动物的dLN活性也不太明显。激发和致敏阶段较高的增殖活性和更明显的促炎细胞因子反应表明,这些活性是DA大鼠对DNCB的CHS反应易感性较高的潜在机制。

相似文献

1
Strain differences in contact hypersensitivity reaction to dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB) in rats.大鼠对二硝基氯苯(DNCB)接触性超敏反应的品系差异
Food Chem Toxicol. 2015 Jan;75:94-103. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2014.11.010. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
2
Contact allergic response to dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB) in rats: insight from sensitization phase.大鼠对二硝基氯苯(DNCB)的接触过敏反应:致敏阶段的观察。
Immunobiology. 2011 Jul;216(7):763-70. doi: 10.1016/j.imbio.2010.12.007. Epub 2010 Dec 25.
3
Impact of the magnitude of sensitization dose on the incidence and intensity of CHS to dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB): insight from ear swelling and challenged-skin draining lymph node response in rats.致敏剂量大小对二硝基氯苯(DNCB)所致迟发型超敏反应(CHS)发生率和强度的影响:来自大鼠耳部肿胀和 challenged-skin 引流淋巴结反应的观察。
J Immunotoxicol. 2013 Oct-Dec;10(4):355-60. doi: 10.3109/1547691X.2012.753960. Epub 2013 Apr 24.
4
Contact and respiratory sensitizers can be identified by cytokine profiles following inhalation exposure.接触性致敏剂和呼吸道致敏剂可通过吸入暴露后的细胞因子谱来识别。
Toxicology. 2009 Jul 10;261(3):103-11. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2009.04.057. Epub 2009 May 5.
5
Oral Cadmium Intake Enhances Contact Allergen-induced Skin Reaction in Rats.口服镉摄入增强大鼠接触变应原引起的皮肤反应。
Biomed Environ Sci. 2022 Nov 20;35(11):1038-1050. doi: 10.3967/bes2022.132.
6
Immunomodulatory effects of low-intensity near-infrared laser irradiation on contact hypersensitivity reaction.低强度近红外激光照射对接触性超敏反应的免疫调节作用
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2003 Aug;19(4):203-12. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0781.2003.00040.x.
7
Immunotoxicity of epicutaneously applied anticoagulant rodenticide warfarin: evaluation by contact hypersensitivity to DNCB in rats.
Toxicology. 2003 Jun 3;188(1):83-100. doi: 10.1016/s0300-483x(03)00047-7.
8
The role of CD4 molecules in the induction phase of contact hypersensitivity cytokine profiles in the skin and lymph nodes.CD4分子在皮肤和淋巴结接触性超敏反应细胞因子谱诱导阶段的作用。
Immunology. 1996 Oct;89(2):250-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2567.1996.d01-726.x.
9
Assessment of preferential T-helper 1 or T-helper 2 induction by low molecular weight compounds using the local lymph node assay in conjunction with RT-PCR and ELISA for interferon-gamma and interleukin-4.使用局部淋巴结试验结合逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)以及针对γ干扰素和白细胞介素-4的酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA),评估低分子量化合物对辅助性T细胞1型或辅助性T细胞2型的优先诱导作用。
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2000 Jan 15;162(2):77-85. doi: 10.1006/taap.1999.8841.
10
The contact allergen dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB) and respiratory allergy in the Th2-prone Brown Norway rat.接触性变应原二硝基氯苯(DNCB)与Th2倾向型棕色挪威大鼠的呼吸道过敏反应
Toxicology. 2008 Apr 18;246(2-3):213-21. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2008.01.013. Epub 2008 Feb 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Differential Proneness to Obesity in Two Rat Strains with Diverse Immune Responses.具有不同免疫反应的两种大鼠品系对肥胖的易感性差异
Biology (Basel). 2025 May 16;14(5):557. doi: 10.3390/biology14050557.
2
Strain-Dependent Differences in Inflammatory/Immune Activity in Cutaneous Wound Tissue Repair in Rats: The Significance of Body Mass/Proneness to Obesity.大鼠皮肤伤口组织修复中炎症/免疫活性的应变依赖性差异:体重/肥胖倾向的意义
Mediators Inflamm. 2025 Mar 26;2025:5525557. doi: 10.1155/mi/5525557. eCollection 2025.
3
Effect of 6'-acetylpaeoniflorin on dinitrochlorobenzene-induced allergic contact dermatitis in BALB/c mice.
6'-乙酰芍药苷对二硝基氯苯诱导的BALB/c小鼠过敏性接触性皮炎的影响。
Immunol Res. 2016 Aug;64(4):857-68. doi: 10.1007/s12026-016-8788-8.