Park Moon Soo, Moon Seong-Hwan, Lee Hwan-Mo, Kim Tae-Hwan, Oh Jae Keun, Lee Seung Yeop, Oh Jong Byung, Riew K Daniel
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical College of Hallym University, 896, Pyeongchon-dong, Dongan-gu, Anyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, 431-070, Republic of Korea.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 250 Seongsan-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 102-752, Republic of Korea.
Spine J. 2015 Apr 1;15(4):607-11. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.10.019. Epub 2014 Oct 22.
The benefits of oblique magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reformations to assess cervical neural foramina have been reported previously in clinical and cadaveric studies. But there is a paucity of literature investigating intra- and interobserver variabilities for assessing cervical foraminal stenosis using oblique MRI views.
To determine the value of oblique MRI views compared with axial and sagittal views for assessing foraminal stenosis of the cervical spine using intra- and interobserver variabilities.
A retrospective study.
Twenty-six patients were included.
Two independent reviewers blindly identified the presence of foraminal stenosis as definite or indeterminate on the sagittal, axial, and oblique views. The assessments using the different views were compared using an independent t test. Intra- and interobserver variabilities were assessed using Kappa analysis.
We evaluated the cervical spine MRIs of patients with varying degrees of foraminal stenosis. The mean age of the patients was 60.8 years (range 50-86 years). Male to female ratio was 16:10. The oblique images were obtained by reformatting the scans perpendicular to the long axis of the right and left neural foramina, respectively.
The oblique or axial views had significantly greater confidence rates for determining the presence of foraminal stenosis than the sagittal views (92.3%, 88.1% vs. 58.0%, respectively, p=.000). The oblique view had significantly better intraobserver agreement than the sagittal and axial images. Both the axial and oblique views had significantly better interobserver agreement than the sagittal images.
Oblique MRI views of the cervical spine significantly reduce the degree of intra- and interobserver variabilities and increase observer confidence in the assessment of foraminal stenosis. Our results suggest that routine use of oblique cervical MRI views might be useful for evaluating cervical foraminal stenosis.
此前临床研究和尸体研究均已报道过斜位磁共振成像(MRI)重组技术在评估颈椎神经孔方面的益处。但关于利用斜位MRI图像评估颈椎椎间孔狭窄时观察者内和观察者间变异性的文献却很匮乏。
通过观察者内和观察者间变异性来确定斜位MRI图像与轴位和矢状位图像相比在评估颈椎椎间孔狭窄方面的价值。
一项回顾性研究。
纳入26例患者。
两名独立的评估者在矢状位、轴位和斜位图像上盲法判定椎间孔狭窄的情况为明确或不明确。使用独立t检验比较不同图像的评估结果。采用Kappa分析评估观察者内和观察者间变异性。
我们评估了不同程度椎间孔狭窄患者的颈椎MRI。患者的平均年龄为60.8岁(范围50 - 86岁)。男女比例为16:10。斜位图像通过分别将扫描数据重新格式化以垂直于左右神经孔的长轴获得。
在判定椎间孔狭窄的存在方面,斜位或轴位图像的置信率显著高于矢状位图像(分别为92.3%、88.1%和58.0%,p = 0.000)。斜位图像的观察者内一致性显著优于矢状位和轴位图像。轴位和斜位图像的观察者间一致性均显著优于矢状位图像。
颈椎斜位MRI图像显著降低了观察者内和观察者间变异性的程度,并提高了观察者评估椎间孔狭窄的信心。我们的结果表明,常规使用颈椎斜位MRI图像可能有助于评估颈椎椎间孔狭窄。