Jacobs Jesse V, Lyman Courtney A, Hitt Juvena R, Henry Sharon M
Department of Rehabilitation and Movement Science, University of Vermont, 305 Rowell Building, 106 Carrigan Dr., Burlington, VT 05405, USA; Center for Physical Ergonomics, Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety, 71 Frankland Rd., Hopkinton, MA 01748, USA.
Department of Rehabilitation and Movement Science, University of Vermont, 305 Rowell Building, 106 Carrigan Dr., Burlington, VT 05405, USA.
Hum Mov Sci. 2017 Aug;54:210-219. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2017.05.007. Epub 2017 May 17.
People with low back pain exhibit altered postural coordination that has been suggested as a target for treatment, but heterogeneous presentation has rendered it difficult to identify appropriate candidates and protocols for such treatments. This study evaluated the associations of task-related and person-related factors with the effect of low back pain on anticipatory postural adjustments.
Thirteen subjects with and 13 without low back pain performed seated, rapid arm flexion in self-initiated and cued conditions. Mixed-model ANOVA were used to evaluate group and condition effects on APA onset latencies of trunk muscles, arm-raise velocity, and pre-movement cortical potentials. These measures were evaluated for correlation with pain ratings, Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire scores, and Modified Oswestry Questionnaire scores.
Delayed postural adjustments of subjects with low back pain were greater in the cued condition than in the self-initiated condition. The group with low back pain exhibited larger-amplitude cortical potentials than the group without pain, but also significantly slower arm-raise velocities. With arm-raise velocity as a covariate, the effect of low back pain remained significant for the latencies of postural adjustments but not for cortical potentials. Latencies of the postural adjustments significantly correlated with Oswestry and Fear Avoidance Beliefs scores.
Delayed postural adjustments with low back pain appear to be influenced by cueing of movement, pain-related disability and fear of activity. These results highlight the importance of subject characteristics, task condition, and task performance when comparing across studies or when developing treatment of people with low back pain.
下背痛患者表现出姿势协调性改变,这被认为是治疗靶点,但表现的异质性使得难以确定此类治疗的合适候选者和方案。本研究评估了与任务相关和与人相关的因素对下背痛对预期姿势调整影响的相关性。
13名有下背痛和13名无下背痛的受试者在自发和提示条件下进行坐位快速手臂屈曲。混合模型方差分析用于评估组和条件对躯干肌肉的预期姿势调整起始潜伏期、手臂抬起速度和运动前皮质电位的影响。评估这些指标与疼痛评分、恐惧回避信念问卷得分和改良Oswestry问卷得分的相关性。
下背痛受试者在提示条件下的姿势调整延迟比自发条件下更大。下背痛组比无疼痛组表现出更大幅度的皮质电位,但手臂抬起速度也明显更慢。以手臂抬起速度作为协变量,下背痛对姿势调整潜伏期的影响仍然显著,但对皮质电位不显著。姿势调整潜伏期与Oswestry和恐惧回避信念得分显著相关。
下背痛导致的姿势调整延迟似乎受运动提示、疼痛相关残疾和对活动的恐惧影响。这些结果突出了在跨研究比较或制定下背痛患者治疗方案时,受试者特征、任务条件和任务表现的重要性。