Firszt Jill B, Reeder Ruth M, Dwyer Noël Y, Burton Harold, Holden Laura K
Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid Avenue, St. Louis, MO 63110-1010, USA.
Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid Avenue, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Hear Res. 2015 Jan;319:48-55. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2014.11.005. Epub 2014 Nov 29.
Adults with unilateral hearing loss often demonstrate decreased sound localization ability and report that situations requiring spatial hearing are especially challenging. Few studies have evaluated localization abilities combined with training in this population. The present pilot study examined whether localization of two sound types would improve after training, and explored the relation between localization ability or training benefit and demographic factors. Eleven participants with unilateral severe to profound hearing loss attended five training sessions; localization cues gradually decreased across sessions. Localization ability was assessed pre- and post-training. Assessment stimuli were monosyllabic words and spectral and temporal random spectrogram sounds. Root mean square errors for each participant and stimulus type were used in group and correlation analyses; individual data were examined with ordinary least squares regression. Mean pre-to post-training test results were significantly different for all stimulus types. Among the participants, eight significantly improved following training on at least one localization measure, whereas three did not. Participants with the poorest localization ability improved the most and likewise, those with the best pre-training ability showed the least training benefit. Correlation results suggested that test age, age at onset of severe to profound hearing loss and better ear high frequency audibility may contribute to localization ability. Results support the need for continued investigation of localization training efficacy and consideration of localization training within rehabilitation protocols for individuals with unilateral severe to profound hearing loss.
单侧听力损失的成年人往往表现出声音定位能力下降,并表示需要空间听力的情况特别具有挑战性。很少有研究评估该人群的定位能力与训练相结合的情况。本初步研究考察了两种声音类型的定位在训练后是否会得到改善,并探讨了定位能力或训练益处与人口统计学因素之间的关系。11名单侧重度至极重度听力损失的参与者参加了5次训练课程;各课程中定位线索逐渐减少。在训练前后评估定位能力。评估刺激为单音节词以及频谱和时间随机频谱图声音。在组分析和相关性分析中使用了每个参与者和刺激类型的均方根误差;使用普通最小二乘法回归检查个体数据。所有刺激类型的训练前到训练后的平均测试结果均有显著差异。在参与者中,8人在至少一项定位测量的训练后有显著改善,而3人没有。定位能力最差的参与者改善最大,同样,训练前能力最佳的参与者训练益处最小。相关性结果表明,测试年龄、重度至极重度听力损失的发病年龄以及较好耳的高频可听度可能有助于定位能力。结果支持需要继续研究定位训练的效果,并在单侧重度至极重度听力损失患者的康复方案中考虑定位训练。