• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经桡动脉穿刺部位及血管造影X程序系统实施以减少不良出血事件的设计与原理

Design and rationale for the Minimizing Adverse haemorrhagic events by TRansradial access site and systemic Implementation of angioX program.

作者信息

Valgimigli Marco

机构信息

Thoraxcenter, Ba 587, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Am Heart J. 2014 Dec;168(6):838-45.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.08.013. Epub 2014 Sep 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.ahj.2014.08.013
PMID:25458646
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Transradial intervention (TRI) and bivalirudin infusion compared with transfemoral coronary intervention or unfractionated heparin plus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors decrease bleeding complications in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Although bleeding is thought to be associated with worse outcomes, it remains unclear whether TRI and bivalirudin both independently lower ischemic or combined ischemic and bleeding complications in ACS patients undergoing contemporary invasive management.

HYPOTHESES

The primary objectives of the MATRIX program are to assess whether TRI or bivalirudin as compared, respectively, with transfemoral coronary intervention (MATRIX access site) or unfractionated heparin plus provisional glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, (MATRIX antithrombin) decrease the 30-day incidence of an ischemic (ie, death, myocardial infarction or stroke) or an ischemic and bleeding composite end point across the whole spectrum of ACS patients, including clarifying the optimal duration of bivalirudin infusion after percutaneous coronary intervention (MATRIX treatment duration).

STUDY DESIGN

The MATRIX (NCT01433627) study, which incorporates 3 randomized comparisons in a nonfactorial manner and primary end points at 30 days and clinical follow-up ≤ 1 year, is a large-scale, multicenter study with blind event adjudication conducted at approximately 100 European sites. With 8,200 patients in the randomized comparison of access sites and 6,800 individuals participating in the randomized comparison of antithrombin regimens, this study will have ≥ 85% power for the primary end points.

SUMMARY

The MATRIX program aims at conclusively ascertaining the role of TRI and bivalirudin infusion in the whole spectrum of ACS patients undergoing contemporary invasive management.

摘要

背景

与经股动脉冠状动脉介入治疗或普通肝素加糖蛋白IIb/IIIa抑制剂相比,经桡动脉介入治疗(TRI)和比伐卢定输注可降低急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者的出血并发症。尽管出血被认为与较差的预后相关,但在接受当代侵入性治疗的ACS患者中,TRI和比伐卢定是否均能独立降低缺血性并发症或缺血性和出血性并发症的联合发生率仍不清楚。

假设

MATRIX研究项目的主要目标是评估与经股动脉冠状动脉介入治疗(MATRIX入路部位)或普通肝素加临时糖蛋白IIb/IIIa抑制剂(MATRIX抗凝血酶)相比,TRI或比伐卢定是否能降低整个ACS患者群体中30天缺血性(即死亡、心肌梗死或中风)或缺血性和出血性复合终点的发生率,包括明确经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后比伐卢定输注的最佳持续时间(MATRIX治疗持续时间)。

研究设计

MATRIX(NCT01433627)研究以非析因方式纳入3项随机对照比较,30天主要终点及临床随访≤1年,是一项在约100个欧洲地点进行的大规模、多中心、盲法事件判定研究。在入路部位随机对照比较中有8200例患者,在抗凝血酶方案随机对照比较中有6800例个体参与,该研究对于主要终点的检验效能≥85%。

总结

MATRIX研究项目旨在最终确定TRI和比伐卢定输注在接受当代侵入性治疗的整个ACS患者群体中的作用。

相似文献

1
Design and rationale for the Minimizing Adverse haemorrhagic events by TRansradial access site and systemic Implementation of angioX program.经桡动脉穿刺部位及血管造影X程序系统实施以减少不良出血事件的设计与原理
Am Heart J. 2014 Dec;168(6):838-45.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.08.013. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
2
Radial versus femoral access and bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin in invasively managed patients with acute coronary syndrome (MATRIX): final 1-year results of a multicentre, randomised controlled trial.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者中桡动脉入路与股动脉入路和比伐卢定与普通肝素的比较(MATRIX):一项多中心、随机对照试验的最终 1 年结果。
Lancet. 2018 Sep 8;392(10150):835-848. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31714-8. Epub 2018 Aug 25.
3
Scientific foundation and possible implications for practice of the Minimizing Adverse Haemorrhagic Events by Transradial Access Site andSystemic Implementation of AngioX (MATRIX) trial.经桡动脉穿刺部位及AngioX系统实施以减少不良出血事件(MATRIX)试验的科学基础及对实践的潜在影响
J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2014 Feb;7(1):101-11. doi: 10.1007/s12265-013-9537-1. Epub 2014 Jan 7.
4
Bivalirudin or Heparin in Patients Undergoing Invasive Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes.比伐卢定或肝素在接受急性冠状动脉综合征有创治疗的患者中的应用。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Mar 20;71(11):1231-1242. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.01.033.
5
Acute kidney injury after percutaneous coronary intervention: Rationale of the AKI-MATRIX (acute kidney injury-minimizing adverse hemorrhagic events by TRansradial access site and systemic implementation of angioX) sub-study.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后急性肾损伤:AKI-MATRIX(通过桡动脉穿刺部位及血管造影X系统全面应用减少急性肾损伤不良出血事件)子研究的原理
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Nov;86(5):950-7. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25932. Epub 2015 Apr 9.
6
Efficiency and safety of bivalirudin in patients undergoing emergency percutaneous coronary intervention via radial access: A subgroup analysis from the bivalirudin in acute myocardial infarction versus heparin and GPI plus heparin trial.比伐卢定用于经桡动脉途径行急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的有效性和安全性:来自急性心肌梗死中比伐卢定对比肝素及糖蛋白抑制剂加肝素试验的亚组分析
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jun 1;89(7):1157-1165. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26804. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
7
Efficacy and safety of bivalirudin in patients receiving clopidogrel therapy after diagnostic angiography for percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndromes.诊断性冠状动脉造影后接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者中应用比伐卢定的疗效和安全性。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Oct 1;76(4):513-24. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22546.
8
Comparison of safety and efficacy of bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin in high-risk patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (from the Anti-Thrombotic Strategy for Reduction of Myocardial Damage During Angioplasty-Bivalirudin vs Heparin study).比较高危患者行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时比伐卢定与普通肝素的安全性和疗效(来自经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中抗血栓策略减少心肌损伤-比伐卢定与肝素研究)。
Am J Cardiol. 2012 Aug 15;110(4):478-84. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.04.017. Epub 2012 May 12.
9
Influence of timing of clopidogrel treatment on the efficacy and safety of bivalirudin in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: an analysis of the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage strategY) trial.氯吡格雷治疗时机对接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者使用比伐卢定疗效和安全性的影响:急性导管插入术和紧急干预分诊策略(ACUITY)试验分析
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Dec;1(6):639-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2008.10.004.
10
Comparison of heparin, bivalirudin, and different glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor regimens for anticoagulation during percutaneous coronary intervention: A network meta-analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗期间肝素、比伐卢定及不同糖蛋白IIb/IIIa抑制剂抗凝方案的比较:一项网状Meta分析。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2016 Dec;17(8):535-545. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2016.09.011. Epub 2016 Sep 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Safety and Efficacy of Femoral Access vs Radial Access in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: The SAFARI-STEMI Randomized Clinical Trial.股动脉入路与桡动脉入路在 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死中的安全性和疗效:SAFARI-STEMI 随机临床试验。
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Feb 1;5(2):126-134. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.4852.
2
Radial Artery Access for Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions: Contemporary Insights and Novel Approaches.经皮心血管介入治疗的桡动脉入路:当代见解与新方法
J Clin Med. 2019 Oct 18;8(10):1727. doi: 10.3390/jcm8101727.
3
Transradial versus transfemoral approach for diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention in people with coronary artery disease.
经桡动脉与经股动脉途径用于冠心病患者的诊断性冠状动脉造影及经皮冠状动脉介入治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 18;4(4):CD012318. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012318.pub2.
4
Perspectives on the 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on Myocardial Revascularization : Fifty Years of Revascularization: Where Are We and Where Are We Heading?2014年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲心胸外科学会心肌血运重建指南解读:血运重建五十年:我们身处何方,又将走向何处?
J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2015 Jun;8(4):211-20. doi: 10.1007/s12265-015-9632-6. Epub 2015 May 19.