Drug Delivery, Disposition and Dynamics, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Drug Delivery, Disposition and Dynamics, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Lancet Infect Dis. 2015 Feb;15(2):225-34. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(14)70850-3. Epub 2014 Oct 21.
In the face of diminishing therapeutic options for the treatment of infections caused by multidrug-resistant, Gram-negative bacteria, clinicians are increasingly using colistin and polymyxin B. These antibiotics became available clinically in the 1950s, when understanding of antimicrobial pharmacology and regulatory requirements for approval of drugs was substantially less than today. At the 1st International Conference on Polymyxins in Prato, Italy, 2013, participants discussed a set of key objectives that were developed to explore the factors affecting the safe and effective use of polymyxins, identify the gaps in knowledge, and set priorities for future research. Participants identified several factors that affect the optimum use of polymyxins, including: confusion caused by several different conventions used to describe doses of colistin; an absence of appropriate pharmacopoeial standards for polymyxins; outdated and diverse product information; and uncertainties about susceptibility testing and breakpoints. High-priority areas for research included: better definition of the effectiveness of polymyxin-based combination therapy compared with monotherapy via well designed, randomised controlled trials; examination of the relative merits of colistin versus polymyxin B for various types of infection; investigation of pharmacokinetics in special patient populations; and definition of the role of nebulised polymyxins alone or in combination with intravenous polymyxins for the treatment of pneumonia. The key areas identified provide a roadmap for action regarding the continued use of polymyxins, and are intended to help with the effective and safe use of these important, last-line antibiotics.
面对治疗多重耐药革兰氏阴性菌感染的治疗选择越来越少,临床医生越来越多地使用多粘菌素和黏菌素 B。这些抗生素在 20 世纪 50 年代在临床上可用,当时对抗菌药物药代动力学和药物批准的监管要求的理解远低于今天。在 2013 年意大利普拉托举行的第一届多粘菌素国际会议上,与会者讨论了一套关键目标,旨在探讨影响多粘菌素安全有效使用的因素,确定知识差距,并为未来研究确定优先事项。与会者确定了影响多粘菌素最佳使用的几个因素,包括:描述多粘菌素剂量时使用的几种不同惯例造成的混淆;多粘菌素缺乏适当的药典标准;过时和多样化的产品信息;以及关于药敏试验和折点的不确定性。研究的高优先级领域包括:通过精心设计的随机对照试验,更好地定义多粘菌素联合治疗与单药治疗的有效性;检查黏菌素与黏菌素 B 对各种类型感染的相对优点;研究特殊患者人群中的药代动力学;并确定单独使用雾化多粘菌素或与静脉多粘菌素联合治疗肺炎的作用。确定的关键领域为继续使用多粘菌素提供了行动路线图,并旨在帮助有效和安全地使用这些重要的最后一线抗生素。